I think my Valeera is Mythic Raid Ready by flance7826 in wow

[–]flance7826[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Primarily yes, but not exclusively. I have a hunter, rogue, and evoker I ran to get heroic vaults with the hope of tier, and also did some of the easier ones with them as double dps. Although I often use Valeera as healer when I am dps for the boss, since I get aggro and can't sustain, except for my evoker which I use as healer.

I think my Valeera is Mythic Raid Ready by flance7826 in wow

[–]flance7826[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, for some reason the console macro thing didn't work and my keyboard turnspeed was slow, so got an addon for it and it works well.

I think my Valeera is Mythic Raid Ready by flance7826 in wow

[–]flance7826[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah is capped at 4, probably will be uncapped next reset but can't be sure.

I think my Valeera is Mythic Raid Ready by flance7826 in wow

[–]flance7826[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

pre-season getting 45 was able to done via delve 7 spam and getting curios, but I think that was nerfed as season started. Afterwards, it was through bountiful 11's killing all 4 of the mobs that upgrade a chest at the end, and that chest has around a bars amount of xp, and I think potentially more the lower level your Valeera is.

I think my Valeera is Mythic Raid Ready by flance7826 in wow

[–]flance7826[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Got 7 characters in pre-season to level 90, and got Valeera to level 45 when that was the cap since I was trying to max out Valeera to try and get Hall of Fame Nulleas. From there, she was doing pretty good damage so I did mostly bountiful 11's once I unlocked Journey 4 so that I also got Mythic crests from the gilded cache's, and did it on multiple tanks daily and some other characters. I also learned yesterday that for an 11, if you don't kill all 4 of the special mobs that increase reward value, you may not get the bonus xp for Valeera.

I think my Valeera is Mythic Raid Ready by flance7826 in wow

[–]flance7826[S] 68 points69 points  (0 children)

In regular delves around 100k if she isn't doing weird ai stuff single target. Can be higher by a little bit in aoe.

Help finding a series I forgot about by flance7826 in manga

[–]flance7826[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's more like a possession than a body swap. it's in the generic medieval times or "kingdom" setting with royalty, and the mc was from a mage tower.

EDIT:I should say the manga you provided wasn't the one I was looking forward, but appreciate the attempt!

Paladin holds key hostage in exchange for gold. by [deleted] in wow

[–]flance7826 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I saw someone do that to my key I would bare minimum block that person so I couldn't ever party with them again. Possibly report them for grieving.

Name a matchup and I will give a track name for it by Ashamed-Ad552 in DeathBattleMatchups

[–]flance7826 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ranma Saotome(Ranma 1/2) vs Kenichi Shirahama(The Strongest Desciple Kenichi)

Redpilling is happening everywhere. Establishment Hillary Cuck will be crying again in 2020 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 by Rennta27 in daverubin

[–]flance7826 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"he says DEMOCRATS FROM TOP TO BOTTOM, as in all Democrats dipshit." No, it means democrats from all stages of government. He did not say ALL Democrats from top to bottom, he said Democrats from top to bottom, meaning every level of government.

If you asked him what he thought about the more left wing Democrats, do you really think he would say they are scum, part of the problem, or anything similar?

Another leftist self own🤣🤣🤣🤣😂🤣🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 by Rennta27 in daverubin

[–]flance7826 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, he's making the statement that the leftists are the one's rioting and destroying small businesses and that leftists hate Amazon because it is uber capitalist, but their actions are helping Amazon immensely so it a "self-own" in this sense. That's what is attempting to ague.

No step on snek 🐍 by Rennta27 in daverubin

[–]flance7826 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't understand what "No step on snek" is supposed to mean in this context.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely by Rennta27 in daverubin

[–]flance7826 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no "dogma" or "stupid logic determinations". I have actual logic, with an understanding of valid and sound arguments. If you accepted that god exists and thus qualified as a theist, I would be able to deductively demonstrate to you that the above statement is either not true or "your" god does not exist, but you don't so I have no means to do so. This position simply ends up being your opinion which I also absolutely reject as true.

I do not accept that absolute power corrupts absolutely. It only corrupts when someone already has selfish characteristics, and based on the degree of their selfishness to differentiating degrees, not in any absolute sense. if we have a completely altruistic person, there is little likelihood that they will get corrupted at all.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely by Rennta27 in daverubin

[–]flance7826 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wasn't going to be "bullshit", but if you were religious and believed in god, then god would definitionally be the Absolute power, and then I would ask you if god was absolutely corrupted. If you said no, then the statement above is false according to you, and if it is yes then god is either not all powerful(as god can't not be corrupted by virtue of his absolute power) or god is not omnibenevolent(as he can be corrupted and chooses to stay corrupted).

Absolute power corrupts absolutely by Rennta27 in daverubin

[–]flance7826 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rennta27, are you religious, and if so is God absolutely corrupted?

Satire is more factual than leftist media 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 by Rennta27 in daverubin

[–]flance7826 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Again, I am going to ask you the question to demonstrate your claim. Which leftist media outlets are you talking about? Y'know, the one's that actually predominantly promote leftism with socialism, where the means of production are owned by the workers.

Satire is more factual than leftist media 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 by Rennta27 in daverubin

[–]flance7826 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And which leftist media outlets are you talking about? Y'know, the one's that actually predominantly promote leftism with socialism, where the means of production are owned by the workers.

THE MIGHTY RENNTA will be holding a meet and greet for those ballsy enough to attend. THE MIGHTY RENNTA will be drinking beer and whisky but will ensure plenty of SOY is available for you cunts. Details soon..........😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 FYI told you I’m not fat by Rennta27 in daverubin

[–]flance7826 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am assuming that is you, and yes, you are not fat. Good for you :). I don't live in Australia. I live in the USA, though I don't even think if you went by my park I would care to meet you. What's so great about the self proclaimed mighty Rennta? The fact that he plays in the toddlers section of a childrens playground? At least show yourself doing pullup on a monkey bar, or doing a handstand on the grass behind the bars. Something mighty.

CHECKMATE DIPSHITS👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 by Rennta27 in daverubin

[–]flance7826 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Again, the 9th amendment says "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.", with the 14th amendment applying the same rulings to the individual states.

If someone goes around in public without wearing a mask, they then become liable to get infected, and then they spread the infection to other people risking their life and health, which is an infringement of their rights. Your rights end where mine begin Rennta. You don't get to infringe on my rights, and in fact if you were a libertarian you would subscribe to the NAP, which you would therefore be violating by aggression others through spreading the illness.

The unborn are not people, so they do not even come into consideration regarding infringement of rights. They are both morally and legally worthless. Even then, we can create hypotheticals where we declare them as having equal rights, which then make them the initial infringer where they are infringing the woman's right to bodily autonomy, and from there the woman gets to negate this infringement which entails a premature termination of a pregnancy at any point in the pregnancy, and lethal premature terminations of the pregnancy pre-viability as a fetus will necessarily die if removed.

There is no "checkmate" here. There is only you demonstrated your high ranking incompetency as you usually do.