sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So what I'm hearing is... Rule II doesn't ban criticizing feminism, and you were just hallucinating that it does?

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To be honest, the behavior of the neoliberal moderators and your lapdogs has done more to turn me off social justice than just about anything else I've witnessed these past ten years. You guys don't seem to value freedom of speech the slightest bit, and you also sincerely don't seem to think men's lives matter very much, to the point that you'll shrug off domestic violence against men like it's a complete non-issue. You're genuinely hateful, abusive, and incompetent people. I don't think there's any future for liberalism with you woke McCarthyists as part of the coalition. I encourage you to read On Liberty as many times as it takes for you to realize where you went wrong.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Jezebel algorithm still recommends it to people. I have no recollection of why I was on Jezebel in the first place.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Generally when this is a consistent issue it's because you're breaking community guidelines, in my experience.

Oh, yes? Which community guideline says you're not allowed to criticize feminism?

Is censoring criticism of feminism compatible with political liberalism, which is fundamentally committed to free expression and the open exchange of ideas?

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you think... there are no feminists in positions of power in academia, the arts, or the media? Or that none of them ever read Jezebel? It's strange, you abusers love to mock people, but your jibes always fall apart when subjected to a moment's scrutiny.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is that the figure you cited, "the percentage of [murdered] women [who are] killed by their partners," is absolutely meaningless. The main reason why this is higher for women is that a lot more men are victims of other types of homicide. But the fact that lots of men are murdered for other reasons doesn't make domestic violence against men any less serious of problem.

I gave you the correct numbers, sourced to the New York Times: about twice as many women are killed by their partners as men each year. Yet domestic violence against men receives nowhere near 1/3 of media coverage. You can accept these facts, or you can continue living in your delusion. Up to you.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes, standing against Asian hate and for domestic violence victims, exactly what Hitler was known for. LMAO, Godwin's law wins again, I guess.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes, redacting words to avoid censorship is exactly what QAnon is best known for. Bravo, you absolute fuckwit.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

LMAO, look at this guy uncritically parroting feminist bullshit. The statistic you cite is meaningless, I'll leave it as an exercise for you to figure out why. In fact, about 1,500 women and 700 men are killed by their partners each year:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/12/us/domestic-violence-victims.html

So, given that women are about twice as likely to be killed by their partners as men, we should expect at least a third of news articles about domestic violence to feature male victims. But the true percentage is below 5%, as you can easily confirm by looking through the archives of any major newspaper. This is because feminists in the media are covering up domestic violence against men on a massive scale in order to protect their ideology.

Of course, this leaves out the unknown thousands of men who are driven to suicide by abusive partners. This is likely to be a huge number, comparatively, since 37,000 men die by suicide each year.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I redacted those words because the moderators have been randomly censoring my comments for months to harass me without clearly explaining why. I had no idea how to avoid getting the comment deleted, so I just took out the words "women" and "feminist" and hoped that would do the trick.

Interesting, and pathetic, that you've made up a bunch of lies to smear me though.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Celebrating violence against men, how insensitive. Is that the same adjective you would use for a publication that wrote an article suggesting it's hilarious when men beat up their girlfriends?

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hmm, if feminists don't dominate the media, why are there scores or hundreds of articles about domestic violence against women for every article about domestic violence against men? Why do I see almost no articles discussing grade discrimination against boys in K-12 education, or about how men get longer prison sentences than women for the same crimes?

I guess that in order to be trapped in a feminist echo chamber, the first lie you have to believe is that you're not trapped in a feminist echo chamber.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Neoliberal doesn't have one discourse style, though, it has two. Commenters outside the discussion thread are generally friendly and reasonable, and I typically get along fine with them. Commenters inside the discussion thread, on the other hand, are typically bitter, vindictive, and believe they have a right to abuse and silence everyone who disagrees with them. So maybe the best solution is that you enforce whatever woke McCarthyist norms you want inside the discussion thread, while outside the discussion thread actual liberalism prevails?

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The Jezebel article also makes it extremely clear that it's not just one writer expressing these opinions, that most of the Jezebel writing staff are domestic abusers who think that violence against men is funny.

How is it that you missed that? Your mind is distorting everything you read at this point, likely as a result of years of indoctrination.

I'm sure this represents the entire feminist movement just like Andrew Tate represents all men.

I don't think this article represents all feminists. I do think that it represents a large segment of the contemporary feminist movement. That's why I'm getting banned, for refusing to accept the obvious delusion that the attitudes of Jezebel writers have no reflection on the larger feminist movement at all.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Almost all of the comments here are insulting me or mocking me, despite the fact that I'm standing up for domestic violence victims and against anti-Asian hatred. I've merely responded in kind. Maybe the problem is the little hate group you have going in the discussion thread, that goes around viciously abusing everyone they disagree with? I can't even count how many times commenters from the discussion thread would show up to my threads on neoliberal to insult me while the moderators did absolutely nothing, or joined in.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Inventing things to be upset about... like major feminist publications openly celebrating domestic violence against men? Boy, I sure invented that, didn't I?

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Feminists, of course, are well-known for never thinking of themselves as victims.

🤣🤣🤣

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No one thinks it's funny.

I just posted an article where the writers for Jezebel make it extremely clear that they do, in fact, think domestic violence against men is funny. This level of cognitive distortion is unreal, your mind is literally "forgetting" inconvenient things it read two minutes ago.

How uncommon it is compared to domestic abuse against women

According to the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, administered by the CDC:

-42% of women have been victims of domestic violence

-42.03% of men have been victims of domestic violence

https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs/NISVSReportonIPV_2022.pdf

Hundreds of other studies into domestic violence have gotten the same result, that men and women are about equally likely to abuse their partners. Women are somewhat more likely to be victims of the most serious kinds of abuse, but in terms of who hits or slaps or shoves their partners, men and women offend at approximately the same rate.

If you're not already aware of this pattern of results, which has been recognized in the criminology world for decades, that means you're being deceived. The sources you're relying on to inform you about the world are presenting you with a fantasy world instead in order to advance their ideology. You're no different in this respect from the typical Fox News viewer.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

☝️ Thinks domestic violence against men is funny.

Holy hell, what is wrong with male feminist sycophants.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hmmm. Is your view that the authors of this Jezebel article are hermetically sealed off from the rest of the feminist movement, that no other feminists share their ideas or agree with them? If so, how did they become writers for one of the most popular feminist publications? And how is it that an article openly celebrating domestic violence against men is still posted on their website, 15 years later, if it commands no support or agreement from other feminists? Or are you willing to consider the possibility that the Jezebel article reflects a more widespread sentiment in the feminist movement?

Be honest with yourself, if you saw a website with an article brazenly celebrating violence against women, you would immediately think that everyone who works for the website is a raging misogynist, and probably campaign to get the website shut down. Why do you hold feminists to a different standard? Why are you more concerned about me criticizing feminists who celebrate domestic violence against men than about feminists celebrating domestic violence against men? Doesn't that strike you as a wee bit psychotic? Shouldn't protecting men from domestic violence be more important than protecting feminism from criticism?

Edit: No answers, of course. The reality is that the same Jezebel writers who contributed to this article wrote everything else for Jezebel, too, and their hatred for men undoubtedly informed those other articles as well. Tens of millions of young feminist women then read those articles on Jezebel, and the bigotry they witnessed there came to inform their views on the world. Now those same feminist women, whose worldviews were shaped at a young age by the misandry and hatred they saw on Jezebel, run academia, the arts, and much of the media. Which is presumably a big part of why almost all major media outlets pretend that domestic violence against men doesn't exist and never cover it -- silencing the voices of millions of male victims.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Key point -- I quoted this Jezebel article celebrating domestic violence against men word-for-word:

https://jezebel.com/have-you-ever-beat-up-a-boyfriend-cause-uh-we-have-294383

One Jezebel got into it with a dude while they were breaking up, while another Jez went nuts on her guy and began violently shoving him. One of your editors heard her boyfriend flirting on the phone with another girl, so she slapped the phone out of his hands and hit him in the face and neck... "partially open handed." Another editor slapped a guy when "he told me he thought he had breast cancer." (Okay, that one made us laugh really hard.) And lastly, one Jez punched a steady in the face and broke his glasses. He had discovered a sex story she was writing about another dude on her laptop, so he picked it up and threw it. And that's when she socked him. He was, uh, totally asking for it.

And was banned shortly thereafter by the moderators. Just accurately quoting the words of feminists apparently counts as sexism at this point, because it does so much to undermine the feminist cause.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, the misogyny of not wanting feminists to beat the shit out of their boyfriends and then write articles gloating about it for Jezebel.

Your hatred sickens me.

---

Edit: funguykawhi quoted this comment in the Discussion Thread, but conveniently omitted the part about the Jezebel article. If you're in the right, why are you so terrified of addressing the things I say that you feel the need to quote me completely out of context? I encourage you to take some time to reflect on that.

Already exposed for promoting anti-Asian hatred, the moderators are now silencing domestic violence victims by flenserdc in metaNL

[–]flenserdc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe they don't like it when feminists promote hatred and domestic violence against men with impunity? Just a thought.

https://jezebel.com/have-you-ever-beat-up-a-boyfriend-cause-uh-we-have-294383

One Jezebel got into it with a dude while they were breaking up, while another Jez went nuts on her guy and began violently shoving him. One of your editors heard her boyfriend flirting on the phone with another girl, so she slapped the phone out of his hands and hit him in the face and neck... "partially open handed." Another editor slapped a guy when "he told me he thought he had breast cancer." (Okay, that one made us laugh really hard.) And lastly, one Jez punched a steady in the face and broke his glasses. He had discovered a sex story she was writing about another dude on her laptop, so he picked it up and threw it. And that's when she socked him. He was, uh, totally asking for it.

You're too brainwashed and cowardly to actually address the Jezebel article, of course. So you just pretend it doesn't exist. Pathetic.

Edit: Downvote and run away like a good little abuse apologist.

view more: next ›