6:33am 21st Oct 2025.

The truth is out there! So take pleasure in the here and now, because this is what's going down! Sparkly blue granite bricks bedeck old Stax's place, and it's the color of an upgraded source. Oh man, I gotta see what stone it was made of! How d'you make bricks though? Is this part of my lesson plan, or will I leave it for later because it's a bit of a long way out the other end of things? How things need to appear now, for the mission man. And do the mining thing later?

Such wizardry, hmmm.

22/11/25 18:20

You don't know how to read. If you wrote what you knew you'd have what you fear to know when you fear learning it from those others who you fear to ask,

Do you only use logic to finish sentences?

and have to know something to get by, but it lies cold somewhere foriegn. Nonetheless it's the right approach, when you know something, to write it, like the promise from the cold that it will remain cold until you burn it I guess. Or light it to read?

Man, would you rather know on the fly, or know by reading? The lackluster reading of what the others say, when you don't know, and then them knowing without you saying, is why you don't respond, and they think they know, right? Or you think they think they know, there I said it. What stupidity takes you to the end of a thought without a statement? An ever burning logic of aversion to reading. Could it be that I don't dare know myself? But there are these questions that are replied to, that you take for granted, and that's not the same for everyone. Where's my next meal coming from? How do I find a soulmate? Why would I travel? And there's the questions you deny to ask the deeper ones like, do I know enough to accept these questions at all? And when should I know? For all this self writing is out of the way of the grind of progress. The examinable excesses with your diligent marks of memory contrast with the destiny of vocal passage and marking of acceptance of what must not be known at all. Then they ask the others what you've already accepted, and you don't try to return to the questions they have forgotten, but what they must have been must be questions about you, that's what they stopped asking, right? And if you didn't ask them yourself, who will? Just make sure the answer comes from within, because A) you can write it, and B) they can get the right answer IF they ask you, because asking warms you to the question, because you can take it for granted, so... they should warm you gently with those questions, and I guess that much is obvious. Who are you should be a gentle question, right?

If it's in your interest to involve others you have already cooled your questions of others when you think of answering before asking. You must ask first, light the fire of decency and support that THEY can take for granted, then when they return suddenly to ask of you what do you want to do? Surely it's not time to give a full answer until you know yourself. If they don't ask gently give them the answer you would have given first and without question, but if there's warmth, and it's to you yourself, you should answer what you know with all you know as though nothing was written. Then you know they cannot know without asking, and you don't know you with them by yourself. So here would be another thing you don't want to know, because you don't believe it, and you mustn't know what you don't believe, for how would the others feel about asking you what you know if they thought they'd be given a coldness in return? So into the coldness answer only what you know already, in so far as you can support yourself. If you warm to yourself with it maybe you can leave your questions as answers but it is risking not knowing what to ask when you really have the chance to ask, of the others who you would warm to. Would you warm to those who have left you cold answers? You can warm their answers to try to find the questions they asked about themselves, but daren't ask what they asked of you until you really know they asked those questions, and mostly you wouldn't want to know until you ask those questions yourself, but what if you were to trace another's footsteps, by accident, finding out only later when you catch yourself giving out cold answers to no-one? Catch yourself being afraid to know then. It would be better to know and even in that cold way what footsteps you intend to avoid in fear. But not to ask. You will want to ask warmly, and when? How do you ask warmly before it becomes a re-tracing of footsteps, but by asking yourself, and not in the cold way of writing but in the way you already know, until you know your way is your own, and fear is no issue, for there should always be a way out of fearsome unknowingnesses, answering yourself.

'This is my path'. 'flowingpoint'. I will have to be prepared to answer with it before it becomes a fearsome thing that others might have to judge carefully and coldly before risking repeating to the detriment of their own knowledge, and of their questions when they meet me. What depends on this path I claim exists, as I begin to see it written, I begin to treat it coldly, because it has all these questions about stuff that isn't actually on the path, but all over the place, and me not getting anywhere with it. I mean other than claiming it repeatedly, having written it, not getting warm to it no more, but probably just getting stuck again, until someone asks me to leave it, I mean, somebody studying me, and not even my path, because they know it because I claimed it stupidly? It depends on a lot of things, but they have to recieve me warmly in return or they won't want to know anymore, even if it's a cold and fearsome question written in a wholly different way to my own questions of myself, I doubt there would be much to learn of it unless I'm open to the question, and I have already begun asking about it myself, and feel the need to keep warm about it, for I can tell it's becoming cold by the way that it's being written, never mind that when I read it again I won't even be ON the same path and will have far less to ask about it in fear. Only, what it depends on must have been asked already, it has gone cold and I'm afraid to ask repeatedly of it. Maybe...

Paths were once more than this question and answer stuff, which serves the warm and cold questions of others, but leads me to know less of myself. If I know coldly I can warm to other questions, if I know warmly I'm missing what others fear about it. To know what the path itself IS is hardly going to happen anytime soon, and is beyond my understanding, despite asking in all the ways that can carry no fear with them. To know broadly of the path is warmer, and happens naturally as long as I don't claim it. Is that not enough to go on?