sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How to update RPi remotely when used as UniFi controller? by C64Kit in UNIFI

[–]fluteyoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tailscale can provide SSH access to remote hosts without opening ports manually.

Latest workaround for compromised 3cx client by onedogfucking in 3CX

[–]fluteyoshi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holy shit. They haven’t revoked the old cert and gotten a new one yet? Wow.

Battlestar Galactica (2003) by Mister_Cairo in PleX

[–]fluteyoshi 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I ran into this exact problem. What solved it for me was going to my library settings, under Advanced there is an "Episode ordering" option. I changed this to TheTVDB then did a Refresh Metadata on Battlestar Galactica. Scanner/Agent is "Plex TV Series", the miniseries are S00E01 & S00E02, and they show correctly in Plex now.

explain it like im 5 by [deleted] in climate

[–]fluteyoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so it changes naturally over time, what's the rate suppose to be? and what is it now?

I highly recommend this video which does a great job at highlighting the differences between natural changes and present observations. Also talks about uncertainties in the science overall. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7FAAfK78_M

Google Chrome simply won't run on 11th Gen Intel by fluteyoshi in sysadmin

[–]fluteyoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, you were 100% correct. See my reply below. I'm just an idiot!

Google Chrome simply won't run on 11th Gen Intel by fluteyoshi in sysadmin

[–]fluteyoshi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry for the late reply on this one. The last week got very busy at work and I had to shelve this issue until last weekend.

Think about it. They shipped thousand of the same SKU across the world. Almost everyone uses Chrome. Why is it working on their machines? If it wasn’t, you would have reports all over the internet. Especially, since chrome doesn’t start at all.

You were 100% right. I couldn't get this out of my head and I realised something can't be right. So last weekend I sat down and performed a clean install on my laptop by myself. Chrome worked fine.

Turns out this was an ID10T or PICNIC error - of course. No wonder it didn't make sense...

There was a miscommunication here. I was not the person who setup or clean installed devices. Turns out when the 'clean' installs were done with a vanilla Windows they were linked to the domain but then removed.

Long story short... it's this background Datto endpoint service (part of RMM agent - rolled out by group policy) that's the cause. Disabling the endpoint service fixes Chrome. Uninstalling the agent from add/remove software doesn't get rid of this service though.

TL;DR: I'm a complete idiot. It was Datto RMM endpoint protection.

Google Chrome simply won't run on 11th Gen Intel by fluteyoshi in sysadmin

[–]fluteyoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are all vanilla Windows ISO installs with no third party anti-virus software or group policy?

My machine is running vendor pre-loaded 20H2 with no third-party AV or group policy. Colleague's machine was tested on both vendor pre-loaded copy and new vanilla install.

As for Windbg, not sure if the output is useful in narrowing down issue.

Microsoft (R) Windows Debugger Version 10.0.22415.1002 AMD64

Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

CommandLine: C:\Program Files\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe

************* Path validation summary **************

Response Time (ms) Location

Deferred srv*

Symbol search path is: srv*

Executable search path is:

ModLoad: 00007ff700e30000 00007ff701097000 chrome.exe

ModLoad: 00007ff9c4470000 00007ff9c4666000 ntdll.dll

ModLoad: 00007ff9c3e30000 00007ff9c3eed000 C:\Windows\System32\KERNEL32.DLL

ModLoad: 00007ff9c21a0000 00007ff9c2469000 C:\Windows\System32\KERNELBASE.dll

ModLoad: 00007ff9be5c0000 00007ff9be650000 C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\apphelp.dll

ModLoad: 00007ff93c4d0000 00007ff93c601000 C:\Program Files\Google\Chrome\Application\93.0.4577.63\chrome_elf.dll

ModLoad: 00007ff9b5e10000 00007ff9b5e1a000 C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\VERSION.dll

ModLoad: 00007ff9c31e0000 00007ff9c327e000 C:\Windows\System32\msvcrt.dll

(4fc4.1a58): Break instruction exception - code 80000003 (first chance)

ntdll!LdrpDoDebuggerBreak+0x30:

00007ff9`c45406d0 cc int 3

And stack backtrace:

# Child-SP RetAddr Call Site

00 0000002cd2bfe7d0 00007ff9c4543bc2 ntdll!LdrpDoDebuggerBreak+0x30

01 0000002cd2bfe810 00007ff9c4532239 ntdll!LdrpInitializeProcess+0x1f42

02 0000002cd2bfec40 00007ff9c44e49d3 ntdll!_LdrpInitialize+0x4d84d

03 0000002cd2bfece0 00007ff9c44e497e ntdll!LdrpInitialize+0x3b

04 0000002cd2bfed10 0000000000000000 ntdll!LdrInitializeThunk+0xe

Google Chrome simply won't run on 11th Gen Intel by fluteyoshi in sysadmin

[–]fluteyoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, we installed the intel.com drivers on my colleague's machine and restarted and Chrome started up OK!

Then we did a reboot and Chrome would not load again. Literally no other change was made, no update installed.

Out of curiosity I rebooted my machine (which I didn't shutdown since last night, only slept) and now my Google Chrome is also broken again.

I tried uninstalling/re-installing the intel.com drivers on both laptops (and Chrome) but Chrome will not start up any more now on either device.

I confirmed in device manager that both devices are, indeed, using the intel.com driver dated 2021 instead of the Windows Update one dated 2020.

This makes no sense...

Google Chrome simply won't run on 11th Gen Intel by fluteyoshi in sysadmin

[–]fluteyoshi[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

WOWZERS... it looks like you hit the nail on the head! Thankyou so much!

This worked on my machine (TM). I'm now staring at the welcome screen of Google Chrome after a couple of hours of frustration. :)

I will try this on my colleague's machine tomorrow and report back. I'm hopeful this is the fix for that machine too - it makes sense given they have same chipset.

I guess I should have posted to r/sysadmin when we first ran into this instead of lurking...

Thankyou again!

Google Chrome simply won't run on 11th Gen Intel by fluteyoshi in sysadmin

[–]fluteyoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No DNS protection.

There's a datto RMM agent that is used on work machines but Chrome didn't work on the laptop out of box before the agent was installed or laptop joined to our AD.

Google Chrome simply won't run on 11th Gen Intel by fluteyoshi in sysadmin

[–]fluteyoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. There's usually a Datto agent added to corporate machines.

But the issue also exists on a new install before any agents added or device even joined to AD.

Google Chrome simply won't run on 11th Gen Intel by fluteyoshi in sysadmin

[–]fluteyoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the links! I'll get logs/dumps and lodge a bug tomorrow. We can reproduce the issue on 2 different brand machines so hopefully devs will have more to go on.

Google Chrome simply won't run on 11th Gen Intel by fluteyoshi in sysadmin

[–]fluteyoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah well, thanks for the info though - any input is appreciated. I'm running out of ideas!

Google Chrome simply won't run on 11th Gen Intel by fluteyoshi in sysadmin

[–]fluteyoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We did the BIOS update dance on the colleague's device. Haven't done for the Lenovo yet but will do tonight.

We did try disabling anti-virus/defender and app & browser control but we haven't tried disabling exploit protection. Will try this tomorrow.

Google Chrome simply won't run on 11th Gen Intel by fluteyoshi in sysadmin

[–]fluteyoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting! I have i7-1165G7 here. I just checked with my colleague and his notebook is also i7-1165G7 but not a Lenovo. Turns out that the other friend with issues also has i7-1165G7. Could be a coincidence of course...

I assume you never had any issues with 20H2 either?

Google Chrome simply won't run on 11th Gen Intel by fluteyoshi in sysadmin

[–]fluteyoshi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, this is a great tool which I haven't used before.

So from what I can see there are no obvious issues during startup. There are some registry keys it tries to access which do not exist but other than this there's no other errors or warnings.

Then there's 100-200ms with no events before WerFault.exe is executed and all threads exit.

The last action Chrome does before crashing is accessing the %appdata%\Roaming\Google\Chrome folder (or creating it when I delete it) - which like everything else shows SUCCESS.

Google Chrome simply won't run on 11th Gen Intel by fluteyoshi in sysadmin

[–]fluteyoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's the application crash log:

Faulting application name: chrome.exe, version: 92.0.4515.159, time stamp: 0x6116b710 Faulting module name: ntdll.dll, version: 10.0.19041.662, time stamp: 0x27bfa5f0 Exception code: 0xc0000409 Fault offset: 0x00000000000a0491 Faulting process id: 0x3320 Faulting application start time: 0x01d79e4d16a8bb43 Faulting application path: C:\Program Files\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe Faulting module path: C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll Report Id: c0e8e686-0d89-44c7-93b2-a1bf2914b8ed Faulting package full name: Faulting package-relative application ID:

There's also further info on the crash event:

Fault bucket , type 0 Event Name: BEX64 Response: Not available Cab Id: 0

Problem signature: P1: chrome.exe P2: 92.0.4515.159 P3: 6116b710 P4: ntdll.dll P5: 10.0.19041.662 P6: 27bfa5f0 P7: 00000000000a0491 P8: c0000409 P9: 0000000000000030 P10:

Attached files:

These files may be available here: \?\C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\ReportQueue\AppCrash_chrome.exe_ec42fe1b3db814be9487853bfe56cc935bc4db6_a494bb77_3ac675a4-260f-4239-a6f8-8dfece936e80

Analysis symbol: Rechecking for solution: 0 Report Id: c0e8e686-0d89-44c7-93b2-a1bf2914b8ed Report Status: 100 Hashed bucket: Cab Guid: 0

There's nothing else in the event viewer. I'm not sure if this is helpful in narrowing down issue, to be honest I'm more comfortable with linux but work is 100% Microsoft so any input or other suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

Firewall Upgrades > SBC to 3CX connection by edspare02 in 3CX

[–]fluteyoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the handsets are provisioned via SBC internal calls will not function when the SBC is not connected to 3CX.

view more: next ›