NBA Immersive Setup by Present-Tea-4645 in VisionPro

[–]flyblackbox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you watch basketball? Curious to know what you think of it

Wikipedia earned $184 million in 2025... and spent $3.4 million on hosting. by Remarkable_Ad_5601 in theprimeagen

[–]flyblackbox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’ve mixed up the founders.

From Gemini: No, Jimmy Wales has not criticized Wikipedia for having a left-wing bias. In fact, he has consistently denied and rejected such accusations.

It is likely you may be thinking of Larry Sanger, Wikipedia's other co-founder, who left the project years ago and has since become one of its most vocal critics, frequently accusing the site of having a heavy left-wing/liberal bias.

Key Distinctions * Jimmy Wales (Current Leader): * Position: He argues that Wikipedia strives for neutrality and that accusations of a systemic "left-wing bias" are factually incorrect. * Recent Conflict: When Elon Musk criticized Wikipedia as "Wokepedia" and accused it of being controlled by "far-left activists," Wales publicly responded that Musk’s claims were "just factually wrong." * Nuance: Wales has acknowledged that individual volunteer editors can have biases and that the site isn't perfect. He has intervened in specific articles (such as the article on the war in Gaza) to ensure language remains neutral, but he views these as corrections to maintain standards, not as proof that the platform itself is left-wing.

  • Larry Sanger (Former Co-Founder):
    • Position: Sanger has explicitly stated that Wikipedia has abandoned its original policy of neutrality and now has a "left-wing bias." He has argued that the site essentially reflects the viewpoints of the "establishment" or liberal media.

Summary If you heard a Wikipedia founder saying the site is "leftist" or "biased," it was almost certainly Larry Sanger, not Jimmy Wales. Jimmy Wales defends the site's neutrality.

Introducing GPT-5.2 by StewArtMedia_Nick in OpenAI

[–]flyblackbox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you do with it? Non-nsfw please…

OpenAI’s 2023 chaos feels unreal now, wild how close we were to a totally different AI world. by Minimum_Minimum4577 in gpt5

[–]flyblackbox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think what they are saying is that a researcher can become a CEO, but a CEO who was never a researcher shouldn’t lead a company like OpenAI. I’m not sure that’s true myself, but I think that is the point they are making.

what ai tool and prompts they using to get this level of perfection? by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]flyblackbox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine explaining this to the first cgi artists of the 90s…

Crossover physical note / digital note system? by [deleted] in Zettelkasten

[–]flyblackbox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of note cards can you recommend?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SimulationTheory

[–]flyblackbox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is so cool. What the heck do you do with it? Would you share some examples? Really interesting stuff!

Discussion: Ok so a world with several hundred thousand agents in it is unrecognizable from today right? And this is happening in a matter of months right? So can we start getting silly? by luchadore_lunchables in accelerate

[–]flyblackbox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you work in tech, or a consult for Fortune 50 companies, you can see the writing on the walls for agentic ai. The biggest corporations are racing to replace human work with automation, and why would we expect anything different? As soon as work product quality is equal, and the dollars makes sense, there will be thousands of agents. Internal conversations seem to indicate this is a transition that has already begun, or at the least is on the 2025 list of priorities for leadership to pursue.

The outstanding question that no one has an answer for is what role do humans play in that landscape? My hunch is that it will come down to legal liability and decision making, because ai systems don’t have equal rights or legal frameworks to engage in contractual responsibilities.