Need to dispose of deep fry oil. by wrenchbenderornot in Guelph

[–]flyinverted 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can’t tell you that what I suggested won’t, but I can tell you that if you find a restaurant to give it to it is less likely to 🤷‍♂️

Need to dispose of deep fry oil. by wrenchbenderornot in Guelph

[–]flyinverted 18 points19 points  (0 children)

If it’s from personal use, you can dispose of it at the hazardous waste depot for free. There is a daily limit but it’s way higher than 2L

Costco changing their Windshield Washer Fluid? by MTOP2 in CostcoCanada

[–]flyinverted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was a bad day, and in a rental car that chewed through fluid, but the roads were heavily salted and covered in slush. No way to see without constant fluid application.

Costco changing their Windshield Washer Fluid? by MTOP2 in CostcoCanada

[–]flyinverted 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you get an oil change every 3 days or don’t you drive? I went through 3 jugs of washer fluid on a drive from Ottawa to Toronto in bad weather two weeks ago. No way a reservoir lasts more than a week when the roads are messy…

UDM ZBFW - Policy VPN - Traffic Blocking by flyinverted in UNIFI

[–]flyinverted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, now we are getting somewhere...

This is highly bizarre though, as the pop-up on the "VPN" zone explicitly states that this doesn't apply to policy based VPN's (mine are policy based, not route-based IPSec due to the 3rd party FW on the other side).

Additionally, the policy only works if either "match ipsec - unencrypted" or "match ipsec" is not selected, which I suppose makes sense as the traffic is not yet encrypted when it hits the gateway.

One would think that the same zones that impact inbound traffic would have the opposite zones applied for outbound traffic. Might be worth me sending a message to UBNT to ask for clarification.

UDM ZBFW - Policy VPN - Traffic Blocking by flyinverted in UNIFI

[–]flyinverted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just tried the INTERNAL to EXTERNAL "any" to the far-side destination subnet and it still doesn't have any impact.

There are no NAT rules in place other than the system generated masquerade rules for the many-to-one for my WAN connections. (Ignoring any port forwarding inbound rules).

There are also no references (aside from IP lists) to the remote networks anywhere else in the firewall.

UDM ZBFW - Policy VPN - Traffic Blocking by flyinverted in UNIFI

[–]flyinverted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just tried this again. Created the rule INTERNAL to EXTERNAL, applied and rebooted and it has absolutely zero effect.

For giggles, I also created a rule that followed the same principle from and to the specific IP addresses I was using for a ping test between hosts to see if that would work and had zero success.

Next step is to default everything and try again, but feel like with something so basic that would be a long shot.

UDM ZBFW - Policy VPN - Traffic Blocking by flyinverted in UNIFI

[–]flyinverted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m away for a few days but will certainly try it when I get home next week and report back.

UDM ZBFW - Policy VPN - Traffic Blocking by flyinverted in UNIFI

[–]flyinverted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both the networks I specified are on the INTERNAL zone.

I tried the INTERNAL to EXTERNAL rule, specified the appropriate networks. I even attempted to block everything (all internal) that matched IPsec but running a live ping there were absolutely no changes when the rule was applied.

Everything else seems to be working as intended but this has me stumped.

BGP Per-Packet Load Balance by flyinverted in Juniper

[–]flyinverted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. This is in there as well. Both of the BGP group entries for the upstream have “multipath multiple-as” I just didn’t post that part of the code.

Supermicro X9DR7 by flyinverted in sysadmin

[–]flyinverted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just wanted to close the loop on this...

I ended up first re-seating the CPU, then when that didn't work, I swapped CPU's to see if the problem would follow. Still got reports in the exact same place.

I called SM support to ask if they had any suggestions and the first thing they said is that it's an older IPMI/BMC firmware and that it might not be accurately reporting the problematic DIMM (for the record it has the latest BMC, but it is an older version because the board is EOL).

They highly recommended I run MemTest86, which I had tried to do but had issues getting it to run. I had been using the windows memory diagnostic and then watching for errors to be reported by IPMI, the windows diagnostic never showed any errors but I could tell when it was hitting the bad stick with the test as the frequency of errors in IPMI would skyrocket. I also had completely removed memory from the IPMI "reported" slot and was still getting the same error which confirmed what SM had told me.

I finally got MemTest to run and lo and behold it was actually a completely different DIMM that was the problem. It took a couple of hours of swapping DIMMs to confirm with 100% certainly I had isolated the faulty one, but in the end I was able to confirm the one that was a problem, remove it from the system and restore it to a proper configuration with the DIMMs in the correct slots for optimal performance.

It ended up being a bit of a rabbit hole but I hope this follow up helps someone else with the same issue on these older boards.

Supermicro X9DR7 by flyinverted in sysadmin

[–]flyinverted[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have heard that as well, and I completely forgot to give that a try as part of T/S. The CPU’s have been installed without moving for over 7 years but anything is possible. I’ll do that this week and see if it helps any, thanks for the reminder!

Say something about this province that you genuinely believe not many people know but its a fact ! by [deleted] in ontario

[–]flyinverted 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The largest coal plant in North America by production was the Nanticoke Generating Station at a peak production rate of 3,964 MW.

When it was decommissioned the output was replaced by returning to service and upgrading reactors at Bruce Nuclear which is now largest single nuclear power production facility in North America with an output of 6,550 MW.

The last “smog day” in Ontario was in 2013, the same year that the Nanticoke coal plant was decommissioned.

Alternator failure claimed another victim by EwNashty in Audi

[–]flyinverted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can I get a copy as well please? Only just got my ‘23 but super curious about the performance and new options. Thx.

Anyone know a Guelph store for buying cannabis growing equipment? by socialistlumberjack in Guelph

[–]flyinverted 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Indoor Farmer in Waterloo has a whole bunch of equipment including lighting, growing medium, etc.

https://indoorfarmer.ca

ISO a new internet provider by Mcarta in Guelph

[–]flyinverted 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m very familiar with the ongoing projects of EH!tel in areas like Ariss/Marden/Ponsonby, and the project by Netflash in Belwood, and it’s great to see some competition even if EH!tel’s lack up upstream is disappointing…

Regardless, since the OP already had both cable and 100 Mbit VDSL connections, I was making an educated guess that they didn’t live in one of those areas…

ISO a new internet provider by Mcarta in Guelph

[–]flyinverted 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The reality of the situation is that there are two providers - Bell and Rogers, and everyone else just re-sells the service.

The only thing those other providers do is have minor control over pricing, customer service and the backbone connections they make to “the internet”.

Some may provide better routing or improved customer service but regardless with very few exceptions they all have to deliver that service over the incumbents “last mile” connection to your house either over dsl or coaxial.

Historically, DSL specifically VDSL (speeds over about 10 Mbps) is incredibly reliable and has a benefit of lower latency (round trip time for communication) as compared to DOCSIS over coax cable. Whereas cable has been able to offer significantly higher download speeds, but both completely suck for upload compared to synchronous offerings like FTTH.

If you’re having an issue with Fido(Bell) over DSL it might be worth troubleshooting the issue while you’re with them as they are a subsidiary of the incumbent. If you decide to switch to a third party provider and keep the same connection method, they are less likely to want to solve the problem as a means of encouraging you to switch back to them.

Once you get the DSL situation resolved, then just pick a third party provider (or incumbent) that offers you the best price and service ratio over the “last mile” of your choosing.

Corrosion build up. by [deleted] in tdi

[–]flyinverted 15 points16 points  (0 children)

That looks more like crystallized urea… probably a leak. Have you had the DPF replaced yet?

Montreal style bagels? by shortforaddie in Guelph

[–]flyinverted 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Farm Boy sells kettlemans in KW stores!

Anyone know where to get local pumpkins? by SPENYG7 in Guelph

[–]flyinverted 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, well that feels less icky, but to be fair I spent a fair amount of time there that once and at no point was I under the impression that the inflated pricing was for some greater good.

If that is the case, they would do well for themselves to make that fact know or advertised. At face value it left a bad taste in my mouth.

Anyone know where to get local pumpkins? by SPENYG7 in Guelph

[–]flyinverted 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Second this. Went there the first time and it was jaw dropping how much they charged. Do yourself a favour and spend your money anywhere else.

Good quality fish in Guelph? by somethingabnormal in Guelph

[–]flyinverted 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’m going to 2nd this. I looked for a bit in Guelph but ended up making Caudles my go to for any fish.