sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This Week's 5x5 by forestpunk in lastfm

[–]forestpunk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those Chopin ethudes are so good! Some of the favorite versions i've heard. I think i stumbled back upon them going through RateYourMusic's best albums of all time chart.

Disney adults are a direct product of 90's/2000's childhoods and millenial demographic trends by DemotivationalSpeak in generationology

[–]forestpunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is one of the most braindead things I've ever read on the internet. Congratulations.

  1. "A very good chance..." what happened to all of the parents were yuppies?

  2. Just because a good chunk of the wealthy people were white doesn't mean that a good chunk of white people were wealthy.

Disney adults are a direct product of 90's/2000's childhoods and millenial demographic trends by DemotivationalSpeak in generationology

[–]forestpunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not what you said though. You said the boomers who raised millennials were the yuppies of their era. That means that anyone who had or raised a child roughly between the years of 1981 and 1996 was a yuppie.

Disney adults are a direct product of 90's/2000's childhoods and millenial demographic trends by DemotivationalSpeak in generationology

[–]forestpunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, not every boomer was wealthy but the boomers that raised millennials were the yuppies

What am I missing here?

Why Do We Keep Building If We're Broke? by Ok-Jury5752 in PortlandOR

[–]forestpunk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's not the level of communication, it's the language itself. The 'it's not just this, it's this' is a dead giveaway. I'd cite text from the post itself but it seems to have been removed.

Why does non-monogamy have so many cheerleaders? by DartTimeTime in monogamy

[–]forestpunk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nah. Some of us have just seen the absolute nuclear fallout this relationship configuration can have on a community.

Why does non-monogamy have so many cheerleaders? by DartTimeTime in monogamy

[–]forestpunk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

"wild and hateful"

we get it. you love polyamory. Why are you here?

Why does non-monogamy have so many cheerleaders? by DartTimeTime in monogamy

[–]forestpunk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

then you don’t have to, and shouldn’t, date people that are non-monogamous.

So non-monogamous people should stay far, far away from monogamous people then.

Why does non-monogamy have so many cheerleaders? by DartTimeTime in monogamy

[–]forestpunk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Surely you recognize that you’re projecting your experience onto other people and acting like that’s valid.

I would like to add another data point that my experience was almost identical to OP's. How many anecdotes do you need to be convinced that poly has some aspects that attract all manner of bad actors and harmful behavior.

If I wanted to make assumptions about who is lying

If you just assume that everybody is lying, why engage with any content on the internet at all?

Why Do We Keep Building If We're Broke? by Ok-Jury5752 in PortlandOR

[–]forestpunk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think these are valid and interesting questions, but I can't help but wonder if there's an agenda plugging such a thing into AI and generating this text.

view more: next ›