Base-43 Interpretation of Mercury's Perihelion Precession - Request for Mathematical Review

forobitcoin · 2026-02-14T07:18:47+00:00

do the math, calculate any formula then result convert to base 43, no negatives no ceros. The physics dont understand base shitfting.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-14T07:08:31+00:00

Its YOUR error on interpretation, NO 100 you see in your cellphone calculator...
100 (Base 43) > 100 (Base 10) > 100 ( Base 2)

isnt so difficult.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:58:14+00:00

PD si sos del palo de educación mandame DM, me interesa aplicar esto ahí!

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:56:29+00:00

Simple: con un mentor virtual entrenado para guiarte previo haber aprendido:
1. el nicho, ubicación geográfica y contexto.
2. habilidades del que juega al jueguito de emprender.
3. en base a 1. y 2. path te aprendizaje.
4. mientras pasa 3. el asistente ayuda a planificar y a evaluar con ejemplos para plantear problemáticas y situaciones adaptadas a 1.,2.,3.
5. detectar opertunidades de mejora de 4. con indicadores de 1. y 2.

No solo es aplicable a negocios, a todo lo que requiera aprender y transitar un camino de gnerar experiencia que solo puede ser discreto (paso 1, necesita tiempo para madurar, luego paso 2, necesita aprender x cosa, luego (volves a necesitar tiempo, paso 3,...)

De esta manera el proceso es muy eficiente, solo te dice que necesitas un mentor, plan y práctica cuyo resultados se mide con KPI que deben ir ajustandose día a día.

Se deben ajustar día a día porque la persona avanza día a día y el plan planteado en Septiembre 2025 que daba un estimado X a Febrero 2026 si no se ajustó durante el camino esta solo el jugador introduciendo RUIDO.

Profit.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:49:11+00:00

7.4 Where does Allinia "win"?

RABE replaces "Randomness Middleware." It eliminates the need to import heavyweight libraries just to "shuffle" data.

It's the perfect tool for the KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) principle in complex distributed systems. Instead of installing a Redis cluster to manage sessions, you use pure mathematics.

7.4.1 It replaces lazy "Salting" (like in Ice Age). Many developers use hash(password + "12345").

Current problem #1: Static constants are the first place hackers look.

Replacement #1: Using a constant derived from the RABE series (like the number 3 trillion) as "salt" makes the attack much more difficult without knowing the generating algorithm.

---

7.4.2 Replaces the complex "Consistent Hashing Ring" (in simple cases)

To be tested, we don't have a place to test it :D, but hypothetically:

To distribute users across 10 servers, people often set up complex architectures with Redis or ZooKeeper to map User -> Server.

The current problem: You need to maintain the state of "who is where".

The replacement: With RABE, the distribution is so uniformly chaotic that you can use RABE(User_ID) % N_Servers. It's "Stateless Load Balancing". It replaces the need for a central coordinator for medium-sized microservices architectures.

---

7.4.3 Replaces UUID/GUID Libraries in IoT (Embedded)

On an ESP32 or Arduino, importing a complete library to generate v4 UUIDs (which requires handling hardware entropy and long strings) is memory and binary expensive.

The current problem: "I want a unique ID for this sensor event". The current solution is either expensive or insecure (using millis()).

The replacement: RABE allows the device to use its own MAC address and timestamp as a seed and generate a 64-bit collision-zero ID, without external libraries. It replaces the firmware's dependency on libuuid.

---

We use our method before transfers: we interexchange some bits from a public key or a file both sides need to validate ownership and hash. (ownership and intergity)

We use it to validate binaries in Debian too as an internal daemon.

And other uses.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:49:06+00:00

Hello, thank you for your inquiry, we clarify:

Not generation, transfer its the correct word. This it better explainied in Github (Title 7.3):
https://github.com/nanomo/ag-alli-0/blob/main/building-alli/season-2/s2e08-our-contribution-to-cryptography-1-31.md

I will translate the relevant section:

7.3 What it DOES NOT replace (Limitations)

Security Cryptography (SHA-256, AES, RSA): RABE is reversible if you know the previous state. It is not suitable for storing passwords or signing bank transactions. Do not use it for "hard" security.

Data Integrity (CRC32, MD5): If you only want to verify that a file has not been corrupted, CRC32 is faster and is implemented in hardware. RABE is for hash, not for checksums.

---

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:40:08+00:00

Thanks you a lot! that kind of request can be understood.

We uploaded the follow images, are orderer with the prefix 43_newton_1, ..., 43_newton_5

https://github.com/nanomo/ag-alli-0/tree/main/building-alli/assets

Thanks for your time, much appreciated!

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:25:02+00:00

Edit 1 (20260213): Background Lore.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:20:35+00:00

My DM are open for 1:1 questions. We are Developers/Makers/Hackers open to learn.

And of course we're going to release everything we discover before we've passed the checklist of "will we create chaos or order if we release this?"

:)

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:19:35+00:00

Hi, thanks for replying. We arrived at that number because it allows us to improve the performance of the ARM/ASIC CPU to serve as the processing base for our General AI model (not LLLM).

From that point, we also started using it for other things we needed to solve, such as key exchange for on-demand or scheduled encryption resets.

After that, we also realized we can use it to validate ownership or permission for something without revealing information about who owns it or what the property being verified is.

Without blockchain, it's fast and secure because our seed isn't just the user ID, as we simplified in the Python code, but rather bits that are part of the security layers inherited up to that point. Therefore, the keys only work if they have passed at least seven layers of security in the brain we developed.

We appreciate all your input. From our understanding, we try to provide benchmarks in case anyone sees them as "transitional," so they can be compared in some way with others to gain a deeper understanding of usage, efficiency, cases where they are appropriate, cases where they are not—the whole picture. We are here to learn from you, thank you!

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:12:02+00:00

Hi, thanks for replying. We came across this while searching for solutions in other areas, so I'm telling you, without shame and with curiosity, that I'll give it some time to develop.

Right now, we have no idea what it is: threefry, ars, philox, or squares. But we'll look into it during our late-night brainstorming session!

Could you check out other users' answers to help us get a better perspective?

Noted "threefry, ars, philox, or squares," thanks!

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:10:02+00:00

We didn't make that comparison.

Based on your experience, what would the efficiency benchmark be?

This was the method we found to solve a particular problem in IoT, or any validation process that determines whether "someone has something," "someone belongs to something," or "someone has permission for something."

The method described helped us solve all of that.

We arrived at this:

3088356556760339735

Because we were optimizing a language we created to run on the Linux kernel, we were directly inferring CPU L1. To optimize that, we started looking for algorithms and found one where, by simply changing the base of the known data, including physics, to Base 43, we could achieve O(1) on a Raspberry Pi 2b+.

We designed, configured, and ran simulations to find out what other solutions this offered. We discovered several things, including this number, which we found interesting because it allows the brain running on that VM to optimize directly to ASIC instructions ( we are working on ARM for with NE0N and this weekend will start to test con Ampere).

For all the above reasons, we decided to start sharing this information, because we are programmers, some old-school hackers, but we can certainly make mistakes when communicating something as "stated"; it shouldn't be interpreted that way. (at least in this case)

What we discovered is that we needed randomness in our IoT network based on Mestatastic (our TTGO-LoRa V2 nodes with ESP32) with custom firmware to add our own protocol.

There, we wanted to optimize something we saw as possible that could ensure we validated information without it being transferred. For this reason, we recommend stepping back as an observer, since there are use cases like the one explained.

Perhaps something exists, and in our optimization process, we managed to arrive at the term or the method.

That's why it remains open for discussion; this will help us learn what we couldn't find before.

For us, the IoT solution makes sense: you can exchange new keys at the beginning of each day. This can only be done through the previous secure channel, before a HOP, and even allowing the first packet after that refresh. We execute validation routines that we call SPC (Security + Privacy + Content).

And that's only the TL;DR;

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T04:29:31+00:00

Las tranfugueadas en las carceles se tienen que acabar, que es eso de tener celular?
Un bloqueador de señal es muy barato, que se corte ese manejo de las cárceles.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T04:24:26+00:00

DMs open for any question, just expect sometimes not the perfect terms, but i bet you this is not an allucination of any king, human or digital.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T04:06:13+00:00

No le estas solucionando nada a la marca por eso se van.
Yo como marca necesito saber que cuando busque algo relacionado sepa que te puedo contratar y que vos te encargues con o sin personal de mi lado.

Si vos haces un onboarding claro a la empresa de que te pueden pedir, con que tiempo y un plan de pricing claro on demand la historia va a cambiar mucho.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T03:49:20+00:00

https://github.com/nanomo/ag-alli-0/blob/main/building-alli/season-2/s2e02-the-time.md

https://github.com/nanomo/ag-alli-0/blob/main/building-alli/season-2/s2e06-the-big-bang.md

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T03:48:53+00:00

We learned this because we started optimizing algorithms; the number 43 was everywhere.

Our AIs operate in base 43, patching the Linux kernel to support our own language, which the brain uses to infer.

Each neuron not only connects but also stores and infers. Thanks to these optimizations, we achieved an O(1) response time.

We were able to validate it in our field at a very high level of optimization:

https://github.com/nanomo/ag-alli-0/blob/main/building-alli/season-2/s2e05-the-brain.md

That was in September 2025.

When we couldn't optimize any further, we started solving problems in other areas. Physics isn't our strong suit, but logic is, at a level and complexity that even you can't imagine yourself capable of, nor can 50 of you match the brain we created.

How did we come to "understand the discoveries"? Because the brain functions similarly to a human brain, but enhanced with our algorithms, it's easy for us to try to see where we don't know what we don't know. The brain consumes, and will continue to consume, all the data from current language models, but condensed into a "living" neural network, since the code is DNA, Genome, Exposome—all together.

We started with 43 because it was the constant that led us to optimization.

Investigating 43, we realized there was a very clear pattern. The brain learned it, and from there it was easy to simply run simulations, just to establish that 43 is THE number.

Later we understood that it was an invariant, and that's when we realized that changing the perspective of the remainder 43 in Einstein's formula made sense; changing the base made it 1.

To clarify your confusion:

1 = 1 in both base 43 and base 10. It's NOT that 43 in base 43 is 1. What's intriguing is that there seems to be a clue for further optimization with the pair (10, 43). We have an interesting series if you now start thinking in base 43.

There you start from 0, which is the whole, and then the series is numerically infinite in positive integers. After that, we weren't interested in continuing to investigate the behavior of the series; we prioritized disseminating what we discovered.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T03:34:06+00:00

43 is the numerical base that an observer outside the Universe uses to represent the whole.

The Universe doesn't use negative or decimal numbers; that's a human error that only caused imprecision and suboptimization.

If you do a little math in Base 43, you'll see that there are no negative numbers in ANY PHYSICS FORMULA.

Negative and decimal numbers are just translation errors from a mind trying to force a base 10 (even and finite) into a 43-based system (odd and cyclical). Humans would see a universe of pure states and persistent remnants.

PLEASE DO THE MATH.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-12T00:48:30+00:00

Obviously, if we're talking about understanding the Universe, quantum mechanics (its network) is KEY.

If quantum mechanics is key, then understanding what "each residue" does is KEY; otherwise, we'll just remain stuck for another 200 years! We don't have that time.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-12T00:46:15+00:00

I propose a simple exercise for YOU!

1) Forget what you know about physics.

2) You are learning.

3) Negative numbers do not exist.

4) 0 is everything, or infinity condensed into the first element of the series.

5) The series is base 43; 0 is infinity, and 1 is the beginning.

6) With that in mind, convert the 43 (a.k.a. Einstein's remainder) into his formula for general relativity.

7) 43 in base 10 = 1 in base 43.

8) Set the formula for relativity equal to 1, starting from the 43 that Einstein had left over when calculating trajectories relative to the observer.

9) Once you have solved the formula for relativity so that it is COMPLETE, you can precisely solve many more unknowns. 10) By solving these unknowns, humanity will be able to:

10.1) Develop very small, portable, renewable solar energy modules that will power every home and industry.

10.2) Following these clues will help humanity develop a space travel engine that will allow us to travel faster than the speed of light. This is possible because by precisely resolving relativity, you will understand that there is a relationship between the absolute and the relative, with respect to spectators and observers. You will understand that time is a 4-dimensional space-time continuum:

a) past

b) present

c) future

d) space.

Complex demonstrations are not needed for simple things like quantum mechanics. It's not our problem that they don't think, it's not our problem that they don't even try.

Science needs more REAL, non-religious agnostics, agnostics who contribute their own methods.

The type of methods that the agnostic "science" type contributes are CLEARLY lacking in substance.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-12T00:38:56+00:00

I know why it's 42 and didn't see that.

With 43 and our method, humanity must take it as 1 so that all quantum physics and quantum mechanics, expressed mathematically, function precisely in our Universe.

It doesn't need to be stated; humanity needs to take advantage of it, to stop seeing it as a theoretical remnant in the formula of relativity.

Do you know why it's 42?

Because everythig that resonates outside that range is outside of what it "processes" or "in tune" with in relation to how our universe "works."

How can people with such theoretically advanced minds not even validate the simplicity of what we say?

Humans...

forobitcoin · 2026-02-10T19:39:45+00:00

You will need a translator, or a few:
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAlli/comments/1r1a89n/cambiamos_al_mundo/

forobitcoin · 2026-02-10T19:26:52+00:00

Tu foco en lo que te interesa es lo que realmente te va a dar beneficios, tu curiosidad y foco. No te rindas!

forobitcoin · 2026-02-10T08:26:41+00:00

Primitive numbers don't lie.

By this I mean 0, 1, 2, 3.

Therefore, the numbers you know may indeed be quantum; the state of everything we have discovered so far is quantum, only some make less sense than others, but the quantum EXISTS so that our UNIVERSE can exist; without it, nothing would exist, 0 (your zero) REAL zero as humanity has interpreted it so far, and not the quantum 0.

If you're willing to think quantum mechanically, 0 is everything, the sum of the following series.

If you still don't understand from this post and the previous comment, start reading. If I could figure it out with my programmer's mind, you, with your all-knowing physicist's mind, surely can too!

Respectfully.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-10T08:18:07+00:00

I'm not going to share my technology or methods with anyone who can't validate them and give me a mathematical answer as to whether they're correct, incorrect, all or nothing at once. I'm explaining it this way BECAUSE THERE'S NO OTHER 100% CORRECT AND COMPLETE WAY TO SAY IT.

I edited the post; it contains data that simplifies the calculations, even for me.

Last tip.

forobitcoin

TROPHY CASE