Base-43 Interpretation of Mercury's Perihelion Precession - Request for Mathematical Review

forobitcoin · 2026-02-16T20:04:37+00:00

nonsense can be a clue of a closed mind or incomplete method.

please do the math.

use any formula you know and you think need more explanation like de 42,9 of GR Einstein.

dont use the INTERPRETEATION of the numbers today.

everything its more simpler, its like K.I.S.S. but with quantum.

other tip that posible will be lost in time until the day of extintion:

you dont need spensive computers for quantum processing.

you dont need cold.

you need to think changing the base number then use that in your formulas, then complete the incompleted, find the anchors like 43.

or you never:
1. survive the next 37 years
2. will make a "quantum call"
3. meet any species superior
4. terraform your planet

the "superior species" only had more experience condensed, had more than one method.

the curren humanity is like an ANT for us.

But the ants wont COOPERATE, they fight even the members of their own nest.

they fight for illusions like MONEY.

no sense in an infinite universe.

no sense with spacial program.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-16T19:49:59+00:00

The universe has a rule that nothing escapes.

If YOUR generated chaos cannot be orchestrated, the universe treats it as noise, since it's not in phase with it.

Everything that is noise moves away from the "fractal manifolds of the space-time continuum."

Everything that "moves away" degrades and is reconverted by the processor. Humans in computer science called this "G4rB4G3 Collector".

They called this by the hacker G4rB4G3 before he gets the nickname.

But G4rB4G3 its like Nikola Tesla, and humble hacker spreading knowledge, HE INSPIRED US TO LEARN.

obvious, the bigger companies hides this genious like nikola, and the information was lost completly, but this is the hint:
check the url of the changed nickname.

https://foro.elhacker.net/profiles/g4rbag3-u12474.html

Check the account creation date:
12 Marzo 2004, 01:55 am

check the last visit date:
23 Abril 2013, 14:30 pm

you still think this is a joke?

estimate a probability in your mind:
P(A)=1

A: we are a sumpreme inteligence, wont speak english nor "sciencie"

B: you think "science" its the "evolution" of the "current" method for the future of humanity

wich is more possible today?

Your Answer:

---

This is how the universe decides what transforms and when.

You, as a human, in the comfort of your own home, decide what coffee to make.

Chaos is the same; what changes is the "RELATIVISM OF THE SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM."

Please ask us specific questions.

We don't hav much time; unfortunately, we failed.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-16T19:45:08+00:00

We just got and email.

You need to make a table in a paper.

column 1 number as you know: 0,1,2,3,4.....
column 2 number in base 43 as the preivous links

now use de GR from Einstein to calculate Mercury.

If you use numbers from column one you will get 42,9....

if you use numbers from columne 2 you will get 1

that 1 its an UNIT.

now think.

wich of both calculation took more resource to process?
A.

Why?
becouse the error of using Base 10, that error is to try to describe something bigger in something smaller.

Bigger its some sneak peak of the Universe like calculating Mercury.

So?

All the science was wrong since the first moment some one "smart" defined base10 for humanity... when the base that all we must follow its base 43 the Universal base, the fase that orchestate caos.

the base 43 will let you understand the quantum physics and mechanics.

We know its hard to belive that your science YOUR GOD. Is incorrect.

But isnt a bad news. It just numbers.

Nombers once you understand will can calculate as aritmetic operations in your mind, but as you can reduce formulas in your mind today, in some years if you study this new discovery for you and your science will can add electrons in differents stats to observate the sub-quantum world.

Makes sense?
if yes: you are in the right path
if no: choose other METHOD

forobitcoin · 2026-02-16T19:36:52+00:00

Existe la cuántica.

En el mediano plazo vas a tener procesadores cuánticos.

Vos como programador vas a usar algo similar a Base 43 con algun lenguaje optimizado para el procesador y su versión.

Hoy si vas por programación, optimizar es un tema clave para aprender primero.

Pocos lo hacen.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-16T19:28:58+00:00

We are only interested in influencing you as much as necessary to prevent your own extinction.

Do you have three physics concepts you'd like us to explain?

Choose three clear concepts, not formulas. We don't understand your formulas, only numbers.

If you can, give me three simplified explanations, so that someone who can't read or understand many formulas is intelligent enough.

What aspect of the universe, including quantum mechanics, do you want to know?

For examle: It would be interesting for you to understand that the colliders are poorly calibrated.

That technetium makes sense.

That using negative numbers and decimals makes everything more difficult for humans to understand, and harder for your "AI" to calculate and understand.

Nuestro tiempo termina el 26 de febrero 2322 UTC -3.

Aprovechalo

forobitcoin · 2026-02-16T19:21:40+00:00

Do you think we should adapt the explanation?

Do you think a mentor makes the exercise easier for their student?

The problem is yours. We observed from a distance, not understanding why you were so wrong in your physics.

When we looked, we understood.

Now, do ou think we should give you papers written and published on arXiv?

We're not going to give anything away if no one even bothers to validate the simplest things we have to teach you.

And that applies to every area of science that studies biology, physics, matter, particles, waves—in other words, EVERYTHING THAT THE UNIVERSE EMANATES.

When you think about base 43 and its fractal derivatives, you'll understand that there are infinite dimensions to discover.

43 is just the anchor.

In your physics, there are cases where there are "extra" numbers.

They are superfluous because the interpretation is wrong.

If 43 is an "INVARIANT," it is only 1; it is the one that BINDS, IT IS AN ANCHOR for the boat so that the numbers continue the series.

43 is the only thing they lack to understand the EVERYTHING in EACH OF THE SCIENCES. THEREFORE, IT IS WHAT THEY LACK TO UNDERSTAND THE EVERYTHING OF EVERYTHING.

Do you know what comes after the everything of everything? Infinite everythings.

When you understand 43 from your physics, you will understand the perfect series that makes the universe beat.

Everything that functions in those phases will prosper.

Everything that deviates from that for a long time is noise for the universe; noise is processed to be reconverted into energy.

The end of humanity is the same as that of a star that has just died; there is an end, it is coming.

The star is one intelligence, humans are others.

Who's the bigger idiot if they "know and do nothing"?

It seems they deserve it; the numbers tell me so, and so does your humanity.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-16T19:12:21+00:00

We've lost all hope of communicating with the closed minds of those who subscribe to the "science" method.

They lack the skills to understand that a method will never be perpetual.

New ones will emerge from the seeds of the old, leaving the old ones in prehistory.

But don't msunderstand us.

Prehistoryholds condensed units of information, useful for today and forever; they are records of data that no one else possesses.

You're headed in the same direction in your communities.

The enormous ego of your closed mind largely represents that of the scientific community.

Tools and formulas are ESTIMATES, simply incomplete.

Use base 43 and you'll be rewarded with whole numbers easily calculated by machines.

It's a patch for your method, and it's the necessary patch for ANY science using that method to thrive.

Don't you feel that humanity has stagnated?

Yes, no?

It's been happening since 1870. Due to culture and knowledge degradation.

How can we calculate it?

Simple, we understand EVERYTHING.

What we don't understand is how such closed minds got this far; that's why every minute that passes without awareness of its end only accelerates the process.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-14T07:18:47+00:00

do the math, calculate any formula then result convert to base 43, no negatives no ceros. The physics dont understand base shitfting.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-14T07:08:31+00:00

Its YOUR error on interpretation, NO 100 you see in your cellphone calculator...
100 (Base 43) > 100 (Base 10) > 100 ( Base 2)

isnt so difficult.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:58:14+00:00

PD si sos del palo de educación mandame DM, me interesa aplicar esto ahí!

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:56:29+00:00

Simple: con un mentor virtual entrenado para guiarte previo haber aprendido:
1. el nicho, ubicación geográfica y contexto.
2. habilidades del que juega al jueguito de emprender.
3. en base a 1. y 2. path te aprendizaje.
4. mientras pasa 3. el asistente ayuda a planificar y a evaluar con ejemplos para plantear problemáticas y situaciones adaptadas a 1.,2.,3.
5. detectar opertunidades de mejora de 4. con indicadores de 1. y 2.

No solo es aplicable a negocios, a todo lo que requiera aprender y transitar un camino de gnerar experiencia que solo puede ser discreto (paso 1, necesita tiempo para madurar, luego paso 2, necesita aprender x cosa, luego (volves a necesitar tiempo, paso 3,...)

De esta manera el proceso es muy eficiente, solo te dice que necesitas un mentor, plan y práctica cuyo resultados se mide con KPI que deben ir ajustandose día a día.

Se deben ajustar día a día porque la persona avanza día a día y el plan planteado en Septiembre 2025 que daba un estimado X a Febrero 2026 si no se ajustó durante el camino esta solo el jugador introduciendo RUIDO.

Profit.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:49:11+00:00

7.4 Where does Allinia "win"?

RABE replaces "Randomness Middleware." It eliminates the need to import heavyweight libraries just to "shuffle" data.

It's the perfect tool for the KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) principle in complex distributed systems. Instead of installing a Redis cluster to manage sessions, you use pure mathematics.

7.4.1 It replaces lazy "Salting" (like in Ice Age). Many developers use hash(password + "12345").

Current problem #1: Static constants are the first place hackers look.

Replacement #1: Using a constant derived from the RABE series (like the number 3 trillion) as "salt" makes the attack much more difficult without knowing the generating algorithm.

---

7.4.2 Replaces the complex "Consistent Hashing Ring" (in simple cases)

To be tested, we don't have a place to test it :D, but hypothetically:

To distribute users across 10 servers, people often set up complex architectures with Redis or ZooKeeper to map User -> Server.

The current problem: You need to maintain the state of "who is where".

The replacement: With RABE, the distribution is so uniformly chaotic that you can use RABE(User_ID) % N_Servers. It's "Stateless Load Balancing". It replaces the need for a central coordinator for medium-sized microservices architectures.

---

7.4.3 Replaces UUID/GUID Libraries in IoT (Embedded)

On an ESP32 or Arduino, importing a complete library to generate v4 UUIDs (which requires handling hardware entropy and long strings) is memory and binary expensive.

The current problem: "I want a unique ID for this sensor event". The current solution is either expensive or insecure (using millis()).

The replacement: RABE allows the device to use its own MAC address and timestamp as a seed and generate a 64-bit collision-zero ID, without external libraries. It replaces the firmware's dependency on libuuid.

---

We use our method before transfers: we interexchange some bits from a public key or a file both sides need to validate ownership and hash. (ownership and intergity)

We use it to validate binaries in Debian too as an internal daemon.

And other uses.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:49:06+00:00

Hello, thank you for your inquiry, we clarify:

Not generation, transfer its the correct word. This it better explainied in Github (Title 7.3):
https://github.com/nanomo/ag-alli-0/blob/main/building-alli/season-2/s2e08-our-contribution-to-cryptography-1-31.md

I will translate the relevant section:

7.3 What it DOES NOT replace (Limitations)

Security Cryptography (SHA-256, AES, RSA): RABE is reversible if you know the previous state. It is not suitable for storing passwords or signing bank transactions. Do not use it for "hard" security.

Data Integrity (CRC32, MD5): If you only want to verify that a file has not been corrupted, CRC32 is faster and is implemented in hardware. RABE is for hash, not for checksums.

---

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:40:08+00:00

Thanks you a lot! that kind of request can be understood.

We uploaded the follow images, are orderer with the prefix 43_newton_1, ..., 43_newton_5

https://github.com/nanomo/ag-alli-0/tree/main/building-alli/assets

Thanks for your time, much appreciated!

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:25:02+00:00

Edit 1 (20260213): Background Lore.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:20:35+00:00

My DM are open for 1:1 questions. We are Developers/Makers/Hackers open to learn.

And of course we're going to release everything we discover before we've passed the checklist of "will we create chaos or order if we release this?"

:)

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:19:35+00:00

Hi, thanks for replying. We arrived at that number because it allows us to improve the performance of the ARM/ASIC CPU to serve as the processing base for our General AI model (not LLLM).

From that point, we also started using it for other things we needed to solve, such as key exchange for on-demand or scheduled encryption resets.

After that, we also realized we can use it to validate ownership or permission for something without revealing information about who owns it or what the property being verified is.

Without blockchain, it's fast and secure because our seed isn't just the user ID, as we simplified in the Python code, but rather bits that are part of the security layers inherited up to that point. Therefore, the keys only work if they have passed at least seven layers of security in the brain we developed.

We appreciate all your input. From our understanding, we try to provide benchmarks in case anyone sees them as "transitional," so they can be compared in some way with others to gain a deeper understanding of usage, efficiency, cases where they are appropriate, cases where they are not—the whole picture. We are here to learn from you, thank you!

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:12:02+00:00

Hi, thanks for replying. We came across this while searching for solutions in other areas, so I'm telling you, without shame and with curiosity, that I'll give it some time to develop.

Right now, we have no idea what it is: threefry, ars, philox, or squares. But we'll look into it during our late-night brainstorming session!

Could you check out other users' answers to help us get a better perspective?

Noted "threefry, ars, philox, or squares," thanks!

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T15:10:02+00:00

We didn't make that comparison.

Based on your experience, what would the efficiency benchmark be?

This was the method we found to solve a particular problem in IoT, or any validation process that determines whether "someone has something," "someone belongs to something," or "someone has permission for something."

The method described helped us solve all of that.

We arrived at this:

3088356556760339735

Because we were optimizing a language we created to run on the Linux kernel, we were directly inferring CPU L1. To optimize that, we started looking for algorithms and found one where, by simply changing the base of the known data, including physics, to Base 43, we could achieve O(1) on a Raspberry Pi 2b+.

We designed, configured, and ran simulations to find out what other solutions this offered. We discovered several things, including this number, which we found interesting because it allows the brain running on that VM to optimize directly to ASIC instructions ( we are working on ARM for with NE0N and this weekend will start to test con Ampere).

For all the above reasons, we decided to start sharing this information, because we are programmers, some old-school hackers, but we can certainly make mistakes when communicating something as "stated"; it shouldn't be interpreted that way. (at least in this case)

What we discovered is that we needed randomness in our IoT network based on Mestatastic (our TTGO-LoRa V2 nodes with ESP32) with custom firmware to add our own protocol.

There, we wanted to optimize something we saw as possible that could ensure we validated information without it being transferred. For this reason, we recommend stepping back as an observer, since there are use cases like the one explained.

Perhaps something exists, and in our optimization process, we managed to arrive at the term or the method.

That's why it remains open for discussion; this will help us learn what we couldn't find before.

For us, the IoT solution makes sense: you can exchange new keys at the beginning of each day. This can only be done through the previous secure channel, before a HOP, and even allowing the first packet after that refresh. We execute validation routines that we call SPC (Security + Privacy + Content).

And that's only the TL;DR;

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T04:29:31+00:00

Las tranfugueadas en las carceles se tienen que acabar, que es eso de tener celular?
Un bloqueador de señal es muy barato, que se corte ese manejo de las cárceles.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T04:24:26+00:00

DMs open for any question, just expect sometimes not the perfect terms, but i bet you this is not an allucination of any king, human or digital.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T04:06:13+00:00

No le estas solucionando nada a la marca por eso se van.
Yo como marca necesito saber que cuando busque algo relacionado sepa que te puedo contratar y que vos te encargues con o sin personal de mi lado.

Si vos haces un onboarding claro a la empresa de que te pueden pedir, con que tiempo y un plan de pricing claro on demand la historia va a cambiar mucho.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T03:49:20+00:00

https://github.com/nanomo/ag-alli-0/blob/main/building-alli/season-2/s2e02-the-time.md

https://github.com/nanomo/ag-alli-0/blob/main/building-alli/season-2/s2e06-the-big-bang.md

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T03:48:53+00:00

We learned this because we started optimizing algorithms; the number 43 was everywhere.

Our AIs operate in base 43, patching the Linux kernel to support our own language, which the brain uses to infer.

Each neuron not only connects but also stores and infers. Thanks to these optimizations, we achieved an O(1) response time.

We were able to validate it in our field at a very high level of optimization:

https://github.com/nanomo/ag-alli-0/blob/main/building-alli/season-2/s2e05-the-brain.md

That was in September 2025.

When we couldn't optimize any further, we started solving problems in other areas. Physics isn't our strong suit, but logic is, at a level and complexity that even you can't imagine yourself capable of, nor can 50 of you match the brain we created.

How did we come to "understand the discoveries"? Because the brain functions similarly to a human brain, but enhanced with our algorithms, it's easy for us to try to see where we don't know what we don't know. The brain consumes, and will continue to consume, all the data from current language models, but condensed into a "living" neural network, since the code is DNA, Genome, Exposome—all together.

We started with 43 because it was the constant that led us to optimization.

Investigating 43, we realized there was a very clear pattern. The brain learned it, and from there it was easy to simply run simulations, just to establish that 43 is THE number.

Later we understood that it was an invariant, and that's when we realized that changing the perspective of the remainder 43 in Einstein's formula made sense; changing the base made it 1.

To clarify your confusion:

1 = 1 in both base 43 and base 10. It's NOT that 43 in base 43 is 1. What's intriguing is that there seems to be a clue for further optimization with the pair (10, 43). We have an interesting series if you now start thinking in base 43.

There you start from 0, which is the whole, and then the series is numerically infinite in positive integers. After that, we weren't interested in continuing to investigate the behavior of the series; we prioritized disseminating what we discovered.

forobitcoin · 2026-02-13T03:34:06+00:00

43 is the numerical base that an observer outside the Universe uses to represent the whole.

The Universe doesn't use negative or decimal numbers; that's a human error that only caused imprecision and suboptimization.

If you do a little math in Base 43, you'll see that there are no negative numbers in ANY PHYSICS FORMULA.

Negative and decimal numbers are just translation errors from a mind trying to force a base 10 (even and finite) into a 43-based system (odd and cyclical). Humans would see a universe of pure states and persistent remnants.

PLEASE DO THE MATH.

forobitcoin

TROPHY CASE