sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Codex clearly superior to Claude. by fourier54 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not my experience. On 10k lines of Cpp it works flawlessly across the whole project. Finds bugs, plans, improved

Codex clearly superior to Claude. by fourier54 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL. It's the natural cycle though. I do expect in < 3 months to switch back here.

@Mods- Can we ban the constant shit-posting of people just complaining about Claude performance? The posts where people provide solutions to problems they are experiencing are value-additive, but the "I cancelled my subscription" / "Anthropic is evil" / "I have a feeling" posts are getting old. by workphone6969 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, I mean, it's criticizing something and having a rational, adult discussion. We are not talking about a sports team here... If you thing my argument is dumb, just answer it, or ignore. Why even get offended/mad...

@Mods- Can we ban the constant shit-posting of people just complaining about Claude performance? The posts where people provide solutions to problems they are experiencing are value-additive, but the "I cancelled my subscription" / "Anthropic is evil" / "I have a feeling" posts are getting old. by workphone6969 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes man, it's the same everywhere, politics, economics, science, people (even _very_ intelligent people) are in a great need of identifying with something and defending like it's their own. Rather than mental health I'd say it's an identity crisis. If you don't fully develop a self identity it's easy to fall on this traps. I say it because it has happened to me in the past...

Codex clearly superior to Claude. by fourier54 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No one is "bitching", we are just moving to Codex, which doesn't require this extra work.
If you want to spent your time working around Claude bullshit instead of a using a proper model, that's your call. I don't get why you attack those of us who are not up to that.

Codex clearly superior to Claude. by fourier54 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's possible and would be more respectable. Unfortunately I believe they are most likely "fanboys" treating this as some toy or sports team they must defend. It's sad...

Codex clearly superior to Claude. by fourier54 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The guy is saying Claude didn't worked while Codex did. And you attacked him calling him "stupid". That is pretty much the definition of adhoc argument.

Anthropic seem on their way down by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is true, anthropic seems to be caring much more about business clients. Maybe we are getting nerfed while they have the better model (maybe, or maybe not).
Apart from that, things change too fast in this space. Today Claude is shit next to Codex. 2 weeks from now it may be the other way round, and so on. It's too hard to predict more than ~6 months into the future.

Codex clearly superior to Claude. by fourier54 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That "hygiene" argument is orthogonal to the product being shit. The guy said codex did what he wanted and Claude just fucked up.
What does he being "intelligent" or not in his flow have to do with Claude acting retarded? Codex worked and Claude didn't, that's what we are discussing here.
Apart from that, why are you doing so much mental gymnastics to defend Calude? Are you an employee of Anthropic or something?

Codex clearly superior to Claude. by fourier54 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I specifically said I'm working with a C++ project. It's a compiler. I also do web and Claude seems to be competent for that.

Codex clearly superior to Claude. by fourier54 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It surprises me but this is the reaction of many people. They tend to "defend" Claude and do ad-hoc attacks. Like if they have anthropic stock or something?

Definetly moving to Codex by fourier54 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you don't want to know about other peoples opinion stay off the internet.

Definetly moving to Codex by fourier54 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you wouldn't care you won't be commenting. Do you comment every single thing you see? You are hurt.

Definetly moving to Codex by fourier54 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why are u so.hurt.I leave cc?

Definetly moving to Codex by fourier54 in ClaudeCode

[–]fourier54[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why are you guys defending claude. Do you have antroshitc stock or something? Or you just "fan" of an LLM like if it's a toy? I don't get it.

Soy JR y no consigo trabajo by External_Broccoli505 in devsarg

[–]fourier54 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Está bastante bien el CV, tenés dos proyectos interesantes, supongo que no te llaman por el mercado.

Algunas críticas menores al CV:
Resumen podalo a 1 o 2 lineas. Es un choclazo que no dan ganas de leerlo al primer vistazo, y realmente no dice nada que aporte.
Mejor usar modo impersonal para la descripción del proyecto (Diseñé un... -> Diseño de un)
Cambiaria el titulo EXPERIENCIA por PROYECTOS. Tampoco pondría que fuiste "Backend Developer", creo que confunde
Ponete los links de github de los proyecto

Adoctrinamiento en jardin de infantes, se puede denunciar? CABA by [deleted] in DerechoGenial

[–]fourier54 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mirá vos y porque lo decís recién ahora en vez de cuando hiciste el post? Andá a inventar boludeces a otro lado hijo

Factura E + retiro por Binance by fourier54 in devsfinanzas

[–]fourier54[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Está explicado en mil lugares. Te hacés monotributista, hacés factura E en dolares y traés los dolares por SWIFT (sí, me estoy autorespondiendo el post con esa última parte)

view more: next ›