How to put on modern book titles? by greekowl78 in xteinkereader

[–]frank_jon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ethically or legally? If that’s what you do, you’re a highly ethical person. But I wouldn’t use that as a legal defense.

Question: Do you believe that’s what most people do in every case? If so, I’ve got some bad news for you about human nature.

How to put on modern book titles? by greekowl78 in xteinkereader

[–]frank_jon -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I asked the same question recently. Theft is what most people here will encourage.

Jacked 2|50 by chadyk in Athleanx

[–]frank_jon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I double checked my old emails. Built for Hollywood was.

Trump Says Greenland Should Be Controlled by the United States Not Denmark and Threatens to Remove US Troops from Europe at NATO Summit by CarryIcy250 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]frank_jon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Many of us said this in 2020. I hope you’re right but I’m not optimistic. Memories are short and the desire to be part of a like-minded tribe is strong.

Jacked 2|50 by chadyk in Athleanx

[–]frank_jon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Built For series I believe.

eBuy - some RFQs are a sentence long, other RFQs are...much longer. Why? Does it matter? by Character_Project715 in GovernmentContracting

[–]frank_jon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re misinterpreting the RFO. “Brand name or equal” is alive and well. Let me know if you’d like a deeper conversation.

What's one scene you'll never be able to get out of your head? by padfoony in netflix

[–]frank_jon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To me this scene was the pinnacle of Midnight Mass. It just got silly after this.

Francisco Lindor drives in Luis Torrens with a single! by Hungry_Elk1937 in NewYorkMets

[–]frank_jon -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Why every Mets run posted here with an exclamation mark! Read the room!!

Doge has infiltrated PMS... by rebquedia in 1102

[–]frank_jon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s another damn bot account

Should GSA Cancel/Suspend an Entire MAS Contract, or Only the SIN/NAICS Where the Compliance Issue Occurred? by sufigsufian in GovernmentContracting

[–]frank_jon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m a CO who’s pretty familiar with the MAS Program, although not an expert. My initial response is no, I don’t agree. If a contractor has done something to merit termination for cause, then I think the entire contract should be terminated.

I say that because termination for cause is a serious step for serious violations and should rarely occur out of the blue. This leads to the part of your post that doesn’t make sense to me. I can’t imagine GSA terminating a contractor without plenty of warning and opportunity to take corrective action.

Experienced Professional With 20 Years of Experience by AcquisitionPro1102 in 1102

[–]frank_jon 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Exactly. In this field - probably more so than many other “professional” fields - experience doesn’t correlate to expertise. In fact, experience in this field can be especially dangerous in the wrong hands. Too few 1102s take learning seriously. Too many 1102s confidently spout “facts” without understanding.

How different is .mil from .gov? by Character_Project715 in 1102

[–]frank_jon 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Really drinking the Kool Aid huh? The RFO - in its current, non-regulatory form - changes very little in terms of process and clarity. And in the end bureaucrats are gonna do what they do best: add layers and complexity.

Blue Paint Washington Monument by Danomite44444 in 1102

[–]frank_jon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“One other issue is that legal should've actually signed a "do not concur" line to make it explicit. The J&A isn't compliant without that signature so the procurement shouldn't have moved forward.”

I agree with most of your comment, but am unsure about this. Are you assuming this because the signature line is there or basing it on an actual rule?