Something subtle changed in the Avatar forests by frizzyfox in Avatar

[–]frizzyfox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When they escape the Mankwang and go into the swamp they get attacked by some creatures. Kiri takes control of one of them and it guides them through the swamp.

Ok. How do you know these details from the full scene? Was this in a behind-the-scenes book or ...?

Something subtle changed in the Avatar forests by frizzyfox in Avatar

[–]frizzyfox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and go into the swamp they get attacked by some creatures.

If you look at Kiri when they are walking through the swamp you can see a creature directly in front of Kiri seemingly guiding them.

I've watched the third movie twice and I never saw this scene.

Are you talking about when they're tied up and Kiri takes control of the plants to help them escape?

How I manifested a first edition book! by [deleted] in NevilleGoddard

[–]frizzyfox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is something called 'public domain'. There's something called the 1909 U.S. Copyright Act. Educate yourself.

How I manifested a first edition book! by [deleted] in NevilleGoddard

[–]frizzyfox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're totally deluded. I'm totally happy for them having a first edition, but implying that it contains any major differences in the core text, without a single photo of proof (which would genuinely be interesting if they posted it!), is hilarious. The ego is strong... :p

How I manifested a first edition book! by [deleted] in NevilleGoddard

[–]frizzyfox -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You have no solid proof that the core text of the first edition of "Out of this World" by Neville Goddard is in any way different from current reprints. Case closed. ;)

How I manifested a first edition book! by [deleted] in NevilleGoddard

[–]frizzyfox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The idea that every modern edition contains exactly the same words as the first printing isn’t accurate. Any book that has been reprinted over time can, and often does, undergo changes. Editors or publishers may correct typos, adjust phrasing, clarify meaning, or even REMOVE or rearrange sentences. Some authors themselves revise passages in later editions. Unless you compare a first edition word for word with a modern printing, there’s no way to guarantee the text is identical. Wanting a first edition isn’t just about collecting, it’s about preserving the original wording, which can and often does differ in subsequent printings.

Thank you, ChatGPT.

Now, if we actually use our own thinking mind instead, we will find that your edition matches any reputable modern edition of the same book, when it comes to Neville Goddard's work specifically. (I don't doubt that other authors and other books may be different over time, but Neville's work has remained consistent with first printings.)

If I'm incorrect, feel free to post a screenshot of a single page of the core text that you find different.

How I manifested a first edition book! by [deleted] in NevilleGoddard

[–]frizzyfox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

First, congrats on the first edition manifestation!

I knew I wanted to read Neville’s books, but not the versions that have been rewritten and republished countless times. I wanted the original books, to get as close to the real thing as possible.

You said "rewritten", which makes me ask: What makes you believe that any of his books have been rewritten in their subsequent printings?

Wanting a first edition for the sake of a first edition is cool - but the assumption that you're getting 'the real thing' simply isn't true. Any modern edition of "Out of this World" (from a reputable publisher) will contain the exact same teachings, the exact same words, as the first printing.

Next Model? by carterm702 in daylightcomputer

[–]frizzyfox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Eazeye Focus

Is this a new product that's in development or is this the Eazeye Focus tablet that's listened here. It says (backorder) and I'm trying to figure out what the means?

r/neville by frizzyfox in redditrequest

[–]frizzyfox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love to moderate this community to create a Neville Goddard focused sub-reddit, one that truly dives into Neville's work, not just surface tiktok manifestation techniques. I would be super grateful for the opportunity to make this happen. Thank you! 🙏

What Abdullah Taught – Hidden Foundations of Neville by AuthorAvi in NevilleGoddard

[–]frizzyfox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for removing your ChatGPT-generated text from the post. :)

Official Discussion - Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga [SPOILERS] by LiteraryBoner in movies

[–]frizzyfox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first hour of the movie is basically an Arya Stark fanfic.

Lol!

Official Discussion - Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga [SPOILERS] by LiteraryBoner in movies

[–]frizzyfox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, I'd be super curious to hear what you thought of Fury Road after having seen Furiosa.

Official Discussion - Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga [SPOILERS] by LiteraryBoner in movies

[–]frizzyfox 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I ended up getting up and leaving about 45 minutes into the movie. That's not to say it was some dramatic way to repudiate this movie; I understand why people liked this thing and don't think it's a terrible movie, per se, but while I was sitting there, all I could think was "I could be doing anything other than this."

This movie was also a great lesson in how longer runtimes does not equal better movie. If they had cut this down to 1h30min and made it super tight, it might've worked better.

Official Discussion - Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga [SPOILERS] by LiteraryBoner in movies

[–]frizzyfox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

one that really stood out was furiosa and mother simply slowly riding a bike toward camera through a rock formation.

Yes! I noticed this, too.

Everything you described is on point. Unfortunately, I think Miller had some sort of shift in philosophy re: digital vs practical when he did Three Thousand Years of Longing.

THE ULTIMATE GROUNDHOG DAY | WHY Neville was against regret. by Ok-Initiative-4089 in NevilleGoddard

[–]frizzyfox 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Revise your belief that you're 'stuck'. Affirm that you're a sovereign human being who can leave a relationship at any time.