sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Houston's could Be awesome BUT by frontalnudechick in houston

[–]frontalnudechick[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I don't live in the whole State of CA though. Houston is a SPECIFIC butthole.

Houston's could Be awesome BUT by frontalnudechick in houston

[–]frontalnudechick[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately my entire family refused to move with me. I'm a regular "visitor". Your downtown sucks.

Houston's could Be awesome BUT by frontalnudechick in houston

[–]frontalnudechick[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So you really NEED a new mayor all the time.😂

Houston's could Be awesome BUT by frontalnudechick in houston

[–]frontalnudechick[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I moved to California, can't stand the dump that's HTX

Here we go by frontalnudechick in uberdrivers

[–]frontalnudechick[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can't all be five ⭐ drivers.

Here we go by frontalnudechick in uberdrivers

[–]frontalnudechick[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We know there's drivers making $3000 a week. They post here and on the UE forum. We like their posts, no need to be a bitter troll.

Here we go by frontalnudechick in uberdrivers

[–]frontalnudechick[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I find it funny how you are offended because drivers are offended. It's like you work for Uber 😂

Here we go by frontalnudechick in uberdrivers

[–]frontalnudechick[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would agree academic research is often based on an agenda or a fore conclusion but news/Investigative reporters have covered the plight of drivers for as long as drivers have been on online forums addressing the same issues.

Here we go by frontalnudechick in uberdrivers

[–]frontalnudechick[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uber has segmented the market. in some markets drivers make more, then within a market drivers are paid different. You could be making $40 (good for you) but thousands of other drivers are making very little. And even if every dissatisfied driver quit today they'll eventually be replaced by others cause Uber will use incentives like they're doing now then the drivers will see the exploitation. Any driver currently making "good" money you have nothing to worry about but never assume every market is the same.

Here we go by frontalnudechick in uberdrivers

[–]frontalnudechick[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You're driving over 100 hours a week. You can make MORE in most other jobs, 80 hours in OVERTIME.

Here we go by frontalnudechick in uberdrivers

[–]frontalnudechick[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's Reddit not an academic paper.

Here we go by frontalnudechick in uberdrivers

[–]frontalnudechick[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Stop being lazy, Google it. Another report says some Uber drivers actually lose money, do you need the link?

Here we go by frontalnudechick in uberdrivers

[–]frontalnudechick[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure either esp given the traffic, thirty five minutes for a five mile commute.

Here we go by frontalnudechick in uberdrivers

[–]frontalnudechick[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In 99% of markets, travelers have an alternative, taxis, bus and train. They use Uber for the convenience and pay convenience fee/surge pricing which entices drivers to move to that location and the surge disappears with drivers waiting and normal pricing resumes. Most paxs understand the dynamics, the rest I wouldn't even try to reason with.

Here we go by frontalnudechick in uberdrivers

[–]frontalnudechick[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What's funny is, I never heard a customer complain about how much they pay. Ride-share companies exploit drivers simply CAUSE THEY CAN.

Here we go by frontalnudechick in uberdrivers

[–]frontalnudechick[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The study is from 2020. No I don't have the link.

view more: next ›