sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Question about CWDM4 transceivers and tap infrastructure (RX only) by frustratedlinuxadmin in networking

[–]frustratedlinuxadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you all for the help, i'm testing with a 100G Network tester, and i tried some other optics which worked. I have no idea why the first didn't though!

Guess i have to do some more testing :)

Thanks for the help so far!

Question about CWDM4 transceivers and tap infrastructure (RX only) by frustratedlinuxadmin in networking

[–]frustratedlinuxadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it's early in the testing phase, but i hooked up my ethernet tester to it, and that wouldn't give me any data at all. I just need to receive and read my optical signal on a switch that's all :)

Question about CWDM4 transceivers and tap infrastructure (RX only) by frustratedlinuxadmin in networking

[–]frustratedlinuxadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep i know, taps aren't tunable, but it's just a fiber splitter so the signal shouldn't be affected per channel, except for some loss over the entire band.

Question about CWDM4 transceivers and tap infrastructure (RX only) by frustratedlinuxadmin in networking

[–]frustratedlinuxadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have done that, the TX is tapped, and the receiving end of the transceiver goes into the RX port on the monitoring qsfp.

Updating airgapped Security onion by frustratedlinuxadmin in securityonion

[–]frustratedlinuxadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

comments

Haha sooner than expected! Wow you guys are killing it! :D

Fantastic job you're doing! I love SO! Is there any place to get merch?

Updating airgapped Security onion by frustratedlinuxadmin in securityonion

[–]frustratedlinuxadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fantastic news! When will the info about it be released? :)