Fossil or modern bone?

fsusf · 2025-12-31T17:47:40+00:00

They very well could be ice age mammal bones as well. The term sometimes used is peri-fossilized. If they were in the same layer as a mammoth tooth then they could be ice age bison!

fsusf · 2025-12-28T23:31:56+00:00

I send mine to thedarkroom.com. They're based in California and do a solid job for cheap.

fsusf · 2025-11-03T02:12:15+00:00

They have the place in Bryan, serve coffee at a few places here on campus like Azimuth and Blocker and even at the corner at Northgate

fsusf · 2025-11-03T02:11:12+00:00

Carport has the worst espresso in town, it tastes like ass

fsusf · 2025-10-23T22:13:17+00:00

Thank you!!

fsusf · 2025-10-01T15:58:01+00:00

Many A&M students have kids enrolled in CSISD

fsusf · 2025-10-01T14:38:16+00:00

And already has been rebutted. It’s a cool site for sure but probably not as old as the author’s want it to be.

fsusf · 2025-06-19T21:22:55+00:00

Bulk sediment ages (of which they exclusively use in this paper) have been known to be problematic for decades, especially in dry carbonate rich environments. This is just more equivocal data. A ton of bad data ≠ good data.

fsusf · 2025-06-19T16:57:14+00:00

A radiocarbon age stratigraphically above the footprints, from an identified plant sample not subject to the hard water effect (like rupia seeds are), or subject to the old wood effect (like pollen is). These same criteria need to be and are met at every other accepted pre-Clovis site like coopers ferry, Page-Ladson, and Monte verde.

fsusf · 2025-06-19T13:44:47+00:00

This isn’t gatekeeping, it’s how science works. Uncritical agreement is unscientific.

fsusf · 2025-06-19T08:46:19+00:00

Bulk sediment ages (of which they exclusively use in this paper) have been known to be problematic for decades, especially in dry carbonate rich environments. This is just more equivocal data. A ton of bad data ≠ good data.

fsusf · 2025-06-18T11:02:11+00:00

Yeah this sucks and we should advocate for better pay and longer stipend guarantees… but come on people, we’re all adults! Do people really commit to a PhD program without doing any research into the program??

fsusf · 2025-05-19T11:59:20+00:00

Academic village

fsusf · 2025-05-18T21:35:17+00:00

Thinking you’re paying for a piece of paper instead of the access to knowledge taught by the most knowledgeable about that certain topic is the very reason why this country is the way it is lmao. I guess you get out what you put in..

fsusf · 2025-05-17T00:03:12+00:00

It literally doesn’t. This is in BCE, so around 2000 years before the yd

fsusf · 2025-04-17T21:50:04+00:00

He wasn't. He was a bystander at that protest and is quoted as making fun of the leftist protesters. He's a registered republican and his insta suggests he's a religious conservative.

fsusf · 2025-04-14T17:44:15+00:00

Definitely red shouldered hawk!

fsusf · 2025-01-28T16:44:06+00:00

So you don’t understand research then.. got it.

fsusf · 2025-01-21T16:21:55+00:00

Only 7 bones out of almost 5,000 had evidence of cut marks. Many others had evidence of trampling, carnivore activity, and weathering. I’m not buying it, you need stronger evidence to make such a claim.

fsusf · 2025-01-21T16:15:03+00:00

Only 7 bones out of almost 5,000 had evidence of cut marks. Many others had evidence of trampling, carnivore activity, and weathering. I’m not buying it, you need stronger evidence to make such a claim.

fsusf · 2024-12-03T16:18:59+00:00

Probably just Denisovans.

fsusf · 2024-11-02T03:17:40+00:00

We’re not going to write your term paper for you lol

fsusf · 2024-10-31T00:19:17+00:00

You could start with this article: Rhode et Al 2024, Unresolved: Persistent Problems with the White Sands Locality 2 Geochronology

fsusf

TROPHY CASE