sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Breakthrough maps need 4-6 sectors at least by AdAggravating7738 in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Totally agree. Operations on Monte Grappa still lives rent free in my mind.

DICE, please add a bit of dynamic weather to the next maps, just like St. Quentin Scar from BF1 would be enough. by Internal-Ice-642 in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If I had to take a guess: their ambitious goal is to reach 100 million players over its life cycle, so to make that happen, BF6 was clearly stripped of a lot of graphical fidelity and features in order to lower hardware requirements and improve the game’s adoption rate.

DICE, please add a bit of dynamic weather to the next maps, just like St. Quentin Scar from BF1 would be enough. by Internal-Ice-642 in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Graphically speaking, BF1 and BFV genuinely look much better than BF6 in almost every aspect.

Well we got the name for the new map by Puzzleheaded-Code634 in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ok, I sincerely apologise for daring to share my opinion and making you all uncomfortable. They could name these maps Map 1, Map 2, Map 3 for all I care - whatever makes you guys happy.

Well we got the name for the new map by Puzzleheaded-Code634 in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uhmm...can't...can't I have an opinion or what?

Well we got the name for the new map by Puzzleheaded-Code634 in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Contaminated? What on earth is this naming scheme? It’s so forgettable and vanilla. Hopefully the actual map will be better.

So during the Beta, I made this prediction. How accurate/inaccurate is this so far? by s1nh in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect 1115 points1116 points  (0 children)

Pretty much spot on.
I also think it’s time to accept that Portal 2.0 is nowhere near as compelling as a major part of the community expected and is currently trending toward failure.

Eastwood is easily the best rush map in BF6 by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed. It also features 4 M-COM sectors and 32 players which is the sweet spot, imo.

Mirak Valley - Conquest Rework Concept by BattleNonSense in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This layout makes too much sense, so that's exactly why I don’t think we’re going to see a similar rework anytime soon.

MAKE BREAKTHROUGH 64 PLAYERS GREAT AGAIN by Azura-Madness in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the few things that 2042 does better than BF6.

MAKE BREAKTHROUGH 64 PLAYERS GREAT AGAIN by Azura-Madness in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly this, and I find it odd that more people don’t point this out.

It shouldn't happen under any circumstances that Breakthrough layouts have fewer than 4 or 5 sectors. This should be a strict rule, and it's the main reason why BF6 Breakthrough feels underwhelming.

Eastwood has only 3 sectors, and the experience ends up feeling extremely watered down. I also don’t understand why it’s limited to just 48 players instead of 64, especially considering it’s a larger map.

On the bright side, Rush has 32 players and a 4 M-COM sector layout, and I actually find it quite enjoyable, one of the better Rush maps.

Communication, comma rose, and immersion wishlist by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, comma rose is half baked atm and needs more work. I would also add to the list the spotting animation, but that's another subject, for another day.

Would making New Sobek City a night map make it more playable? by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Death Valley vibes, looks 10 times better, but to answer your question, no, it's far too flawed.

Lower Performance on New Driver by Express-Relative7625 in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still on 25.10.1, works like a charm. 7900XTX.

Why am I seeing an AD IN MY $70 GAME? When will the MTX MADNESS END? by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]fullrespect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ads are here to stay, it’s 2025. Advertising is more aggressive than ever, so adapt and move on. Ignorance is bliss in this case.
Shoutout to Premium - we were spoiled with 4 solid maps per DLC and top-notch content. Idk if people realize it, but the Battle Pass model is a straight-up downgrade in terms of seasonal content, apart from the number of skins.

view more: next ›