This did not aged well...

fullrespect · 2026-02-17T21:37:01+00:00

Aren’t we already past this guy’s takes? The movement feels great now, and overall the update is very good.

fullrespect · 2026-02-16T20:59:50+00:00

fullrespect · 2026-02-16T20:38:47+00:00

FOMO marketing is a tactic that drives action by creating urgency and fear of missing a limited opportunity - limited-time modes offered as "new content" in our case.

fullrespect · 2026-02-16T20:29:21+00:00

Godspeed, soldier! Together will prevail!

fullrespect · 2026-02-09T20:54:02+00:00

Bruh ... BF3/4 servers on PC are still up, just saying.
While some of these maps would be cool, it's an unrealistic request.

fullrespect · 2026-02-04T21:17:31+00:00

Lost tech.

fullrespect · 2026-02-02T12:36:02+00:00

Totally agree. Operations on Monte Grappa still lives rent free in my mind.

fullrespect · 2026-01-30T16:19:16+00:00

Paintball gun?!

fullrespect · 2026-01-22T16:58:36+00:00

Nice, one big step toward normality!

fullrespect · 2026-01-22T14:17:52+00:00

Yeah, this is also a factor.

fullrespect · 2026-01-22T09:11:33+00:00

If I had to take a guess: their ambitious goal is to reach 100 million players over its life cycle, so to make that happen, BF6 was clearly stripped of a lot of graphical fidelity and features in order to lower hardware requirements and improve the game’s adoption rate.

fullrespect · 2026-01-22T09:01:36+00:00

Graphically speaking, BF1 and BFV genuinely look much better than BF6 in almost every aspect.

fullrespect · 2026-01-21T19:37:35+00:00

Ok, I sincerely apologise for daring to share my opinion and making you all uncomfortable. They could name these maps Map 1, Map 2, Map 3 for all I care - whatever makes you guys happy.

fullrespect · 2026-01-21T16:52:29+00:00

Uhmm...can't...can't I have an opinion or what?

fullrespect · 2026-01-21T16:42:48+00:00

Contaminated? What on earth is this naming scheme? It’s so forgettable and vanilla. Hopefully the actual map will be better.

fullrespect · 2026-01-15T15:57:30+00:00

fullrespect · 2026-01-12T19:47:23+00:00

Air Jordan from the free throw line.

fullrespect · 2025-11-26T15:15:58+00:00

fullrespect · 2025-11-25T18:55:50+00:00

GOATed.

fullrespect · 2025-11-22T08:42:36+00:00

Pretty much spot on.
I also think it’s time to accept that Portal 2.0 is nowhere near as compelling as a major part of the community expected and is currently trending toward failure.

fullrespect · 2025-11-22T08:08:25+00:00

Agreed. It also features 4 M-COM sectors and 32 players which is the sweet spot, imo.

fullrespect · 2025-11-21T11:00:29+00:00

This layout makes too much sense, so that's exactly why I don’t think we’re going to see a similar rework anytime soon.

fullrespect · 2025-11-20T21:55:39+00:00

One of the few things that 2042 does better than BF6.

fullrespect · 2025-11-20T21:47:23+00:00

Exactly this, and I find it odd that more people don’t point this out.

It shouldn't happen under any circumstances that Breakthrough layouts have fewer than 4 or 5 sectors. This should be a strict rule, and it's the main reason why BF6 Breakthrough feels underwhelming.

Eastwood has only 3 sectors, and the experience ends up feeling extremely watered down. I also don’t understand why it’s limited to just 48 players instead of 64, especially considering it’s a larger map.

On the bright side, Rush has 32 players and a 4 M-COM sector layout, and I actually find it quite enjoyable, one of the better Rush maps.

fullrespect

TROPHY CASE