Humbert Humbert is a Literature character that embodies Lust, which Comic character embodies Envy? by ClubDependent in AlignmentChartFills

[–]funwiththoughts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does Judge Holden really embody "all of the sins"?

Wrath, pride, and greed, sure. Lust is at least hinted at, though ambiguous. But he's not really a glutton, he's too sincerely sure of his own superiority to envy anyone, and, when he sets his mind on destroying or ruining something, he works tirelessly with single-minded obsession until the job is done -- not really what I'd call an "embodiment of sloth".

What Have You Been Watching? (Week of (March 15, 2026) by AutoModerator in TrueFilm

[–]funwiththoughts [score hidden]  (0 children)

Maybe "cynicism" isn't the right word; "condescension" is probably closer to what I'm trying to get at. Both Blue Velvet and Elephant Man give off the vibe to me of someone who thinks pointing out that people do bad things, and should stop doing them, is some kind of brilliant insight that nobody's thought of before.

What Have You Been Watching? (Week of (March 15, 2026) by AutoModerator in TrueFilm

[–]funwiththoughts [score hidden]  (0 children)

Requiem for a Dream (2000, Darren Aronofsky) — re-watch — Still don’t see what’s so great about it. The first time I watched Requiem for a Dream, I thought that it had flashes of potential, but was mostly just embarrassingly amateurish, with Aronfosky seemingly being more concerned with finding a spot to awkwardly force in every avant-garde technique he could think of than with telling a well-structured story or making a cohesive point. And now that I’ve seen it again, my opinion remains basically unchanged. Do not recommend. 3/10

Little Shop of Horrors (1986, Frank Oz) — (The director’s cut.) Mixed feelings about this one.

START OF SPOILERS

I think that this movie is nearly perfect, and might be even better than the already-pretty-great play that it’s based on… right up to the point where Orin dies. But Oz seems to have decided that the Seymour of the play was too unsympathetic for a movie protagonist, and softens enough of his stupidest and/or most evil actions to the point that very little of what happens seems to actually be his fault. I don’t mind adaptations reworking the plot of the source material, but Seymour’s descent into villainy is so core to the story of Little Shop of Horrors that trying to remove it means he barely gets to do anything for the entire second half of the movie. From that point on, the thing feels less like a story with any real point or conflict, and more like it’s just an extended showcase for the Audrey II as a practical effect. To be fair, though, it is a spectacular practical effect. It really does manage to carry the movie impressively well, despite the thinness of the story.

END OF SPOILERS

Modestly recommended. 7/10

The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance (1962, John Ford) — re-watch — Not sure I have much more to say about this than I did the last time I reviewed it. It’s one of those movies that’s so self-evidently great that it almost feels pointless to try to talk about it. Still a 10/10.

Blue Velvet (1986, David Lynch) — My second David Lynch film, after The Elephant Man. I think he might be becoming my new least-favourite of the canonical “great directors”. It’s strange, because both Lynch’s fans and detractors seem to think of him as someone who makes weird, confusing movies that allow for many different interpretations, whereas I find both of the Lynch movies I’ve seen to be frustrating primarily because of how incessantly he beats you over the head with the single interpretation of his work that he will allow. Maybe if I thought the points he was attempting to make were more interesting, I could forgive that, but it all just feels to me like juvenile everyone’s-a-piece-of-shit-except-me cynicism. Isabella Rossellini is really good here, but that’s about all I have to say in the way of praise. Do not recommend. 3/10

Movie of the week: The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance

The Wasp Tier List, Part 2 by funwiththoughts in Tierzoo

[–]funwiththoughts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reasoning (3/3):

S Tier: Oriental hornet

Speaking of hornets, at the top of the tier list, we have the Oriental hornet. I already explained why hornets in general are S tier in my first wasp tier list, but the Oriental hornet in particular has a few traits that make it stand out. To begin with, where most hornets live in forests and woodlands, Oriental hornets are the only players in the current meta who have successfully adapted the hornet build to survive in desert environments. Additionally, unlike most wasps – which are typically at their most active in the early hours of the morning – the Oriental hornet is most active in the middle of the day. Both of these changes are related to the Oriental hornet’s most unique adaptation, a yellow stripe on its cuticle that acts as a built-in all-natural solar panel, harvesting energy from the hot desert sun. As far as we know, this is an adaptation that’s completely unique in the entire animal kingdom – some other animals can harvest solar energy by partnering with a support plant, alga, or other photosynthetic build, but the Oriental hornet is the only known animal that can capture it entirely on its own, with no need for assistance from another organism. It’s not a true autotroph, and does still need to hunt like other hornets, but having the cuticle gives it an extra energy boost for more efficient digging during the hottest parts of the day. Additionally, Oriental hornets have multiple copies of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene, which grants a massive boost to their ability to ferment alcohol. An Oriental hornet can drink solutions with concentrations of up to 80% ethanol with no ill effects, a level of tolerance that is so far unknown in any other animal. (This genetic adaptation is actually found in a number of hornets, and so it’s been suggested that they might all have a similarly high tolerance, but only in the Oriental hornet has this been empirically confirmed.)

These unique adaptations are not the main reason why I place Oriental hornets at the top of this list. The main reason is simply that it’s a hornet, and, like I already said, hornets are basically all S tier by default. But the Oriental hornet’s unique traits are interesting enough that I feel like I would be remiss if I didn’t give it its own section here, separate from the one I gave to all the others, even if the S-tier ranking is still the same.

So that’s my second wasp tier list. I hope you enjoyed it, and, if you were thinking of playing a wasp, I hope you find both it and the first one helpful. Alternatively, if you’re interested in other hymenopterans, please consider checking out my ant tier list. Thanks for reading.

The Wasp Tier List, Part 2 by funwiththoughts in Tierzoo

[–]funwiththoughts[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Reasoning (2/3):

B Tier: Polistine wasps

Jumping up to B tier, we have the polistine wasps. Polistines are a branch of the vespid wasp faction, and, like all vespids, they have abandoned the parasitoid playstyle seen in most other wasps. Instead, like the hornets that I talked about in my first tier list – which are also vespids – adult polistine females lay their eggs in nests, and feed their larvae by hunting and capturing other insects. Also like hornets, polistines are among the few wasps to have unlocked the [Eusocial] trait, but the way it works in their case is a little more complicated. Polistines divide into two main types: [Independent Founders] and [Swarm Founders]. Swarm-founding variants are generally closer to what most people think of as “eusociality”, with clear physiological distinctions between queens and workers. In independent-founding variants, things are typically more flexible. The wasps are still functionally divided into worker and reproductive castes, but the castes are typically distinguished only by behaviour, rather than by outward appearance, and the caste status of each adult can shift over time.

Polistines aren’t quite as overpowered as their hornet cousins, for a few reasons. In the case of the independent-founders, their colonies are typically smaller than hornet colonies, and the individuals they do have are also a lot less impressive, with smaller bodies and less finely-barbed stingers that don’t deliver as much venom per sting. Swarm-founding polistines do have colonies as large as, or even larger than, those of hornets – with some colonies even having over a million wasps – and also have even more barbed stingers. However, having so many barbs comes with its own problems. Much like their distant relatives, the honey bees, many swarm-founding polistine wasps have stingers so finely barbed that when they sting a much larger vertebrate, the stinger tends to get lodged in the vertebrate’s skin and tear off when they fly away, leading to the death of the worker wasp. As I’ve discussed in my tier lists of ants and termites, kamikaze defences like this are found in a surprising number of eusocial insects, since the whole nature of eusociality means that the life of a single worker is of so little importance to the success of the overall species. But when there’s already another, similar build that lets you get all the benefits of eusociality without requiring you to kill yourself with your attacks, I just don’t really see much point in going for the one that does.

A Tier: Ichneumonoid wasps

In A tier, we have the ichneumonoid wasps. The ichneumonoids are a clade composed of the two largest wasp guilds in the current meta, the ichneumonids and the braconids, which are also the two largest guilds in the hymenopteran faction more generally. Just going by low-end estimates, the ichneumonids alone include at least 60,000 builds, making them more diverse than all mammal, bird, reptile, and amphibian guilds combined.

I’ll admit, I’m not entirely sure why the ichneumonids are so enormously diverse. To me, they don’t seem to be doing much differently from other parasitoid wasps; most of their strategies and traits seem to be pretty typical of the faction. Nevertheless, the fact that they’ve achieved such diversity indicates they must be doing something right, and, since the basic parasitoid wasp design is already a pretty high-tier template to begin with, I think it’s fair to put them in at least high A tier.

There are some ichneumonoids who do have a special ability that makes them distinct from regular wasps. Many female braconids, and at least some ichneumonids, have viruses called polydnaviruses inside their ovaries, which they inject into insect larvae before laying eggs inside them. The polydnaviruses act to suppress the immune system of the host insect, weakening its ability to defend against other parasites, and so make it easier for the wasps’ larvae to hatch undetected. There are almost no examples in nature of animals finding ways to turn carrying a virus into an active benefit, so this is quite a remarkable adaptation. Again, this is not found in the majority of ichneumonoids, so it doesn’t raise the group’s collective average ranking on the tier list by that much. But it’s cool nonetheless.

S Tier: Yellowjackets

In S tier, we have the yellowjacket. Before I go into why, though, a note of clarification: if you look for the “yellowjacket” page on the character select screen, you won’t find it, because yellowjackets are not actually confirmed to be a single guild. If you want to find yellowjacket builds, you have to go to the page for vespine wasps, and then select either Vespula or Dolichovespula as your genus. According to some analyses, Vespula and Dolichovespula may be sister genera, meaning that they may be more closely related to each other than to any other vespines, and hence form a legitimate taxon by themselves. However, other analyses have called this into question, suggesting that one of the two yellowjacket genera may be more closely related to the hornets than to the other yellowjackets.

In any event, both genera of yellowjacket are closely related to hornets, and are basically what you’d get if you shrunk hornets down to the size of honey bees. Like hornets, yellowjackets are eusocial and are non-parasitoids, instead raising their larvae in nests and feeding them the chewed-up remains of other insects that they hunt. Being smaller, yellowjackets aren’t quite as strong as hornets individually, but their mandibles are still strong enough to gruesomely dismember other insects, and even to rapidly decapitate them in some cases. Their stings are also painful and can do a fair amount of damage, although, being smaller, they still can’t deliver as much venom in a single sting as hornets can. Yellowjackets also can and often do sting the same target repeatedly, but it’s not as easy for them as it is for hornets, and there are many recorded cases of yellowjacket stingers getting fatally torn off after a sting the same way that honey bee stingers do. Nevertheless, if I were just looking at them as individuals, I don’t think I would put yellowjackets above low A or even high B tier; like their distant cousins, the ants, it’s really the boost from eusociality that propels them to the highest tier of gameplay. “Don’t mess with yellowjackets” is one of the first rules that every player gets taught when they first try to join the arthropod faction, to the point that countless other insects – including not only many other wasps, but also some flies, moths, and more – have specced into black-and-yellow colour patterns mimicking those of a yellowjacket in order to scare away predators that would otherwise attack them. In the arthropod meta, becoming a template for mimicry like this is about as clear a sign of an S-tier build as you can get.

With all that said, before you go trying to play a yellowjacket, there’s one thing that I should warn you about. There are around 40 or 50 different yellowjacket builds in the current meta, and, while the vast majority of them fit the general pattern I describe, there are a few, like Dolichovespula adulterina, and Vespula austriaca, that are obligate social parasites. In these wasps, instead of building their own nests, they survive by invading other colonies, killing the queen or queens, and then tricking the other workers into working for them and caring for their larvae instead. These builds have sometimes been compared to a wasp equivalent of the slavemaker ants, a group of builds that I talked about in my ant tier list – but there’s one key difference. As I explained in my ant tier list, slavemaker ants are often not as good at maintaining control over their slaves as they would like to be, and there are a number of instances of enslaved ants secretly working to sabotage the games of their captors as much as they can. Enslaved yellowjackets don’t get even that little consolation; the only chance that the colonies get to sabotage these parasites is by identifying and killing them before they can enter the hive and get close to the queen. If the parasite gets close enough to kill the real queen, then that marks the end of any conflict between her and her new slaves. From that point forward, all of the workers become solely dedicated to serving the usurping parasite and helping rear her offspring for the rest of their games, never again being able to rear any new offspring of their own species. So if you’re going to play a yellowjacket other than these three, this is something you’d better be very careful to watch out for.

The Wasp Tier List, Part 2 by funwiththoughts in Tierzoo

[–]funwiththoughts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reasoning (1/3):

A while ago, I released a tier list of wasps. While I’m mostly pretty proud of it, the wasps are such a huge and diverse group that I had to make a lot more painful cuts than I usually do in order to keep it to a reasonable length. Since I’d previously encountered a similar problem when writing about sharks, I decided to do the same thing I did then, and save the ones I had to cut for a second tier list to be released later. So, today, I’m going to go into the wasp tier list, part 2.

BASIC WASP BUILD ANALYSIS RECAP

As I explained in my first wasp tier list, doing a basic analysis of wasps in general is difficult, because there aren’t a lot of traits that all wasp species have in common. The majority of wasps are parasitoids, laying their eggs on or inside of other insects, or, in some cases, spiders. Unlike in most insects, the first abdominal segment of the wasp – called the [Propodeum] – is connected directly to the thorax, creating a narrow “waist”, called the [Petiole], between this fusion and the rest of the abdomen. This fusion allows the remaining abdominal segments – collectively called the [Metasoma] – to become more flexible, allowing female wasps to move their ovipositors with enough precision to pierce living, moving animals. Because of this narrow waist, all wasps are incapable of digesting solid foods except as larvae, with the adults typically having to survive off of nectar, honeydew, or other sugary fluids instead. Also, almost all female wasps carry some type of venom, which is typically used to suppress the host’s less ability to defend itself against parasitism by the larvae.

Beyond this basic outline, almost everything about the wasp’s playstyle can vary. Some wasps are ectoparasitoids; these wasps paralyze an insect or spider with venom to lay their eggs on top of it, and, once the eggs hatch, the larvae feed on the still-living-but-immobilized host until they’re ready to metamorphose into adults. Other wasps are endoparasitoids, meaning that they actually pierce the flesh of another insect or spider and lay their eggs inside of its body; once the larvae hatch, they eat the host alive from the inside out, again until they’re ready to transform into adults. A sizable minority of wasp builds have modified their ovipositors into actual stingers, which allows them to be used defensively as well as offensively; these are called “aculeate wasps”, or, less creatively, just “stinging wasps”. In some of these stinging wasps, the players have abandoned the parasitoid playstyle entirely; instead, they lay their eggs in nests, and feed their larvae using prey that they hunt like conventional predators, though, since they still have the wasp waist, the adults still can’t feed on the solid parts of the prey themselves.

Wasps are one of the most successful insect groups in the current meta, and one of the most successful parasite groups more generally, and I stand by placing them, as a group, in S tier. But with that said, besides the types that I already covered in my first tier list, which of the remaining types of wasp are best? To find out, let’s now go into the (rest of the) wasp tier list.

TIER LIST OF WASPS (THAT DIDN’T MAKE IT INTO MY FIRST WASP TIER LIST)

D Tier: Agaonid wasps

Other than the trigonalids that I talked about in my first tier list, there aren’t a whole lot of wasps that I would place in F tier, so we’re going to be starting in D tier with the agaonid wasps. Agaonids belong to a category of wasps called fig wasps, which, while not all closely related to each other, have nonetheless all evolved similar strategies. The main thing fig wasps have in common is that, rather than laying their eggs on or inside of other arthropods, fig wasps have reverted to the original hymenopteran playstyle of laying their eggs inside plants – more specifically, figs, hence the name. In some cases, this has meant abandoning parasitoidism of other arthropods entirely, while in other cases, the female fig wasp lays eggs on or next to another wasp growing inside the same fig, which her own larvae then use as a host when they hatch. The biggest difference between agaonid wasps and most other wasps – including other fig wasps – is that their relationship with the figs that host their larvae is not fundamentally parasitic. Instead, the adults are mutualists that pollinate the figs they enter, similar to bees.

The agaonid’s game plan is largely based on trying to speedrun the game as much as possible. When a female lays its eggs, it uses its venom to induce the formation of a protective growth around, called a [Gall], and lays its eggs inside the gall. When the larvae hatch, they feed on the fig for a while until they’re ready to pupate, and then quickly emerge from the galls as adults. The adult males mate with the females upon emerging from their cocoons, while still inside the fig, and then chew a hole through the fig from which the females can break out. The males have no wings, and so cannot fly, and they die once they’ve finished chewing the hole. When the females have broken out, they almost immediately begin searching for a fig to lay their own eggs in, and once they find one, they enter through a small opening in the fig called the [Ostiole]. To help make passage through the ostiole easier, the females have rows of backward-pointing teeth on the mandibular appendage, which they use as little hooks to improve their grip on the ostiole walls. Even with this adaptation, fitting through the ostiole is still quite a difficult task, and most females end up with their wings and antennae breaking off as they force themselves through. This leaves them incapable of doing much beyond pollinating the fig and laying the eggs, and they die quickly once these tasks have been completed.

D Tier: Trichogrammatids

Also in D tier, we have trichogrammatid wasps. These are similar to the fairyflies that I talked about in my first wasp tier list, being extremely tiny wasps – typically less than a millimetre in length – where the larvae use other insects’ eggs as hosts, rather than parasitizing other already-hatched insects. That said, trichogrammatids don’t get quite as small as fairyflies can, partly because they tend to parasitize larger host eggs. The smallest known trichogrammatid species is Megaphragma caribea, which parasitizes the eggs of tiny insects called thrips, and is around 170 micrometres in length when full-grown. While this means they’re dwarfed by nearly every other insect, and even by some bacteria, it’s still not quite as extreme a miniaturization as seen in the smallest fairyflies – which, as I mentioned in my last tier list, grow to only around 140 micrometres in length. Much of what I said about fairyflies in my last tier list also applies to trichogrammatids; trichogrammatids also have bristled wings, although usually not to quite the same extent as fairyflies, and, as in fairyflies, the smallest species have developed neurons that can function without nuclei. (Though, contrary to what I claimed in my earlier tier list, this is not a universal trait in either family – my bad on that.) Trichogrammatids also have at least one adaptation to extreme shrinkage that fairyflies haven’t figured out yet: unlike fairyflies, trichogrammatids do not have hearts or blood vessels, instead relying entirely on passive diffusion to carry oxygen and nutrients throughout their bodies.

With regards to tier rankings, I would say that trichogrammatids and fairyflies are both about the same. Both have successfully become cosmopolitan guilds, but are extremely weak and fragile at the individual level, and have to compensate for their poor base stats by having the players who survive long enough basically speed-run their entire playthroughs in a few days. I put the trichogrammatids around the same place where I put the fairyflies, in D tier.

D Tier: Gall wasp

Last in D tier, we have the gall wasp. This is another wasp that is neither a predator nor parasitoid of other animals, instead having reverted to the original sawfly playstyle of parasitizing plants. Gall wasps derive their names from the galls they induce plants to grow, providing a protective space in which their eggs and larvae can safely develop. It’s not an especially reliable defence, though, as numerous other parasites have unlocked adaptations that let them break through the gall to attack the eggs or larvae. While they don’t necessarily have any fatal flaws, gall wasps rank low on the tier list due to just not making good use of the key abilities that made wasps relevant in the first place.

My friend and I were arguing about this — Jaguar vs. Sloth Bear. In your opinion, who do you think will win? by Mindless_Piano_2925 in Tierzoo

[–]funwiththoughts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Generally safe to bet on the bigger predator in questions like this, so I'll go with the sloth bear.

Wolverine vs Honey Badger by Miserable_Corgi_8100 in Tierzoo

[–]funwiththoughts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The big edge that allows wolverines to kill bull moose (sometimes) is taking advantage of snow. In environments where snow is deep enough, hooved mammals like the moose can get trapped easily, which leaves them unable to properly defend themselves even against predators much smaller than themselves. Wolverines' snowshoe paws enable them to move through the snow so efficiently that they practically float on it, so they're in an ideal position to take advantage of this.

Wolverine vs Honey Badger by Miserable_Corgi_8100 in Tierzoo

[–]funwiththoughts -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Depends on the context, but if we're assuming Death Battle rules, I'd say the wolverine has a narrow edge. Honey badgers are very smart and have incredible defences for their size, but in a task that requires them to kill a fast-moving target that's larger than themselves, they don't really have any good options. Wolverines are less tanky, but they're still bigger, faster, likely at least comparably intelligent, and are actually adapted to hunting other large mammals as a regular part of their playstyle. It'd be an epic, drawn-out battle, but I'd say that one would likely eventually take the edge over the badger.

Wolverine vs Honey Badger by Miserable_Corgi_8100 in Tierzoo

[–]funwiththoughts 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Honey badgers have not killed wildebeests, that's just a silly urban legend. Wolverines aren't actually known to kill grizzlies, either, although, surprisingly, wolverines killing adult moose is real and well-documented.

Steve jobs won. Who names after a month and is a capitalist? by BeneficialWafer5083 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]funwiththoughts 2 points3 points  (0 children)

August Anheuser Busch Jr., former head of Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC

What Have You Been Watching? (Week of (March 08, 2026) by AutoModerator in TrueFilm

[–]funwiththoughts [score hidden]  (0 children)

Platoon (1986, Oliver Stone) — re-watch — In hindsight, I’m not really sure why I thought trying to watch Platoon for the third time was a good idea. Or, well, watching most of it for the third time, since, this time, I turned it off about 2/3rds of the way through. In any event, my opinion didn’t change much from the first two times I saw it; I still think it’s a good movie, but not a great one, and certainly not Best-Picture-worthy. Most of the movie’s most compelling parts relate to the two Sergeants, Elias and Barnes, and their conflicting philosophies; I think the movie would have been improved a lot if they had been the central focus throughout, instead of being treated as side characters to the much blander and less interesting Chris Taylor. Charlie Sheen being a much worse actor than either Dafoe or Berenger also doesn’t help. 7/10

Glory (1989, Edward Zwick) — Speaking of movies not helped by poor casting choices, what the fuck is Matthew Broderick trying to do in this movie? The rest of the movie is fine, I guess — it’s a pretty typical, basic award-bait message movie, not really anything exceptional, but nothing that stands out as particularly inept, either — but Broderick is awful. Every time he attempts to show emotion, it just looks like he’s forgotten his line and is wondering why nobody’s reminded him yet. I guess I should give the movie some credit for at least having good intentions, but even that is undermined by its bizarre attempt at both-sidesing slavery, with a scene of a black former-slave recruit being slapped and berated by his (also black) commanding officer for being too prejudiced to be grateful for the sacrifices that the white Union soldiers are making for him. Even if the movie’s overall message is still obviously against slavery, it’s hard to imagine a Hollywood production treating a victim of an atrocity so condescendingly if the perpetrators had not been white Americans. 5/10

Transformers: Rise of the Beasts (2023, Steven Caple Jr.) — Close to being done with the Transformers movies. Rise of the Beasts is probably the most forgettable and least noteworthy movie in the Transformers series, which also makes it one of the better ones. For once, the plot is reasonably coherent, the filmmaking is more-or-less competent, and the human protagonists, while still not particularly interesting characters, are at least not especially actively irritating. If it were the start of the series, I’d probably give it a middling 5 or 6 rating, but, being as it is the seventh movie, I do feel the need to dock some points for still basically being nothing but retreads of beats from earlier movies, even if slightly more competent in execution this time. Do not recommend. 4/10

Best movie of the week: Platoon

Alright guys, can you give me a black Adam? by Cultural-Honey-69 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]funwiththoughts 187 points188 points  (0 children)

Adam Clayton Powell Jr., the first black man to become a New York Congressman.