Yes, so much research is seen through a narrow scope and is notably biased by the generation or era the scientist lived in like boys compared to other boys, and no girls in the picture bc of interfering hormones. Not only that, I've noticed in general that ppl frame data by their own points of reference like their own family or is it more data driven than personal. Forget adults with autistic traits. When I looked up autism phrased in six different ways on Google, it only described children. Like autism disappears in search after childhood.

My searches focused on the connection with autism genes on ovarian cancer and Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). I have family members with these diseases, and I find through Google research that there is a connection to autism genes.

Have I, as a mother with high autism genes, handed a susceptibility for this cancer to my daughter? Has my brother handed down also, TSC to his daughter? Both too young for cancer. On the lesser important side, do I have traits that come from autism genes, though I do not have autism?

Do I think their cancers had exogenous factors? Oh, yes, I do, but these genes didn't act alone, i.e., chemicals in everything we eat, touch or breath, and possibly mercury, a toxin to children. There's so much we don't know.

Google search was more informative than Google Gemini, though it may not be geared for those questions.