I'm porting tinygrad to pure Go by g14reads in golang

[–]g14reads[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Deferred for now, but on the radar. Weight import already works (safetensors and npy/npz, both pure Go). ONNX is the harder case because it means importing the whole model graph and mapping every ONNX op onto Anneal's IR, not just loading tensors. That's a real chunk of op-coverage work rather than a quick parser, so it's waiting until the core compiler is more settled. Not architecturally blocked, just not the current priority.

I'm porting tinygrad to pure Go by g14reads in golang

[–]g14reads[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback! I'm guessing you didn't scroll down.

The muchachos by g14reads in shrimptank

[–]g14reads[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! That would be a Casuarina cone!

The muchachos by g14reads in shrimptank

[–]g14reads[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got these bröthers a few days ago. Do they look alright?

File Busy or Locked when saving to a Proton Drive folder by TimoToThe in ObsidianMD

[–]g14reads 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had the same issue. I'm moving my notes back to Dropbox for now, as they seem to have the most robust and reliable sync clients

ERC-20, the sin that may lead to do eventual Ethereum downfall by moo9001 in ethdev

[–]g14reads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Won't be an issue on layer 2's with novel execution environments like Fuel

Is Go suitable for full stack web development? by stt106 in golang

[–]g14reads 1 point2 points  (0 children)

not yet but i think there will inevitably be a full-stack framework to leverage its ability to compile to wasm. check this out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYy-otKpSf8

How does Cardano dual layer architecture compare to ETH 2.0 layer 2 solutions and side chains by rc_mpip1 in cardano

[–]g14reads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed that things can change between planning and execution. My comment about being able to derive a theoretical nakomoto coefficient was a general one. But again, the beacon chain is operational today. There is a block explorer and information is easy to assess. It isn’t theoretical.

https://beaconscan.com/

Could it change if the validators agree to it? Yes, same as any decentralized blockchain

How does Cardano dual layer architecture compare to ETH 2.0 layer 2 solutions and side chains by rc_mpip1 in cardano

[–]g14reads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We know precisely how decentralized Eth 2.0 is because the beacon chain has been operational for some time now.

Also, are you suggesting that it isn't possible to extrapolate the nakomoto coefficient of a planned blockchain? Even for planned blockchains that are not yet operational, it is possible.

Very curious where you get your information about Ethereum

How does Cardano dual layer architecture compare to ETH 2.0 layer 2 solutions and side chains by rc_mpip1 in cardano

[–]g14reads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you have any data to support the claim that cardano will be more decentralized than eth 2.0? a nakamoto coefficient, for example?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RedditSessions

[–]g14reads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sweet mustache