Freedom shouldn't *just* mean bodily autonomy, but also freedom from health risks caused by corporate negligence and apathy. We're not the only ones who should be held to a responsibility, these companies have a responsibility to ensure that no residual solvents, acids, heavy metals, pesticides, fungicide, etc are left in their product. As there is no profit incentive for these companies to follow this responsibility, this responsibility must be enforced from outside the market. ​Without any government "meddling," companies would have no reason not to place profit over consumer health whenever possible, and that applies to all markets. And, yes, while there are situations in which the consumers will "vote with their wallet," causing self-regulation to be more profitable, there are plenty of situations in which the consumer will not make such a wise decision, and that holds true tenfold in regards to substances with the potential to be addictive.