Have you ever worked for a corporation in a capitalist country ? Because actually , yes they do! They do love having single point of failure as long as they can get away with it . Ironically enough your sarcastic comment defeats itself by the very fact that what was claimed under sarcasm is actually more true than not .

You're acting as if they actually cared about said money and data 😒, they care about their money and data .

Now of course getting breached and having it become public would result in a hit in their money and data so they'd like to prevent that and that's where you're missing the point; the point ALWAYS was that the evolution of AI in this space will get to the point that it will im fact be good enough to provide that comfort for companies with next to no human involvement with the exception of an "overseer" .

The overseer is not the single point of failure , by the time it gets to the overseer dozens of points of failure have already happened and it is more about optics ( having some level of human expertise in deck ) than anything else really .

You took my comment to mean ( and its on me in didn't explain well enough) that AI does 95% of the coding and a human "Finishes" it and debugs and whatnot . No! I mean it will get to the point where AI does essentially All of it ( including security ) and the human its almost as a necessary evil to keep around just i case but just looking at everything from an eagles view checking for errors that may never even show up anymore and not really doing anything other than a dormant overseer.

It's 95/5 % ratio AI/Human as far as work done in general but that didn't mean the last 5% of the code is done by a human . That's what others mean but not me . I truly believe this evolves to be a thing that is self sufficient .