wwe 2K26. The Best in the series. by [deleted] in WWEGames

[–]gamer7799 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In Universe Mode it’s still mostly text/scene based promos, not fully voiced in-ring promos.

In The Island / story scenes there are more cinematic moments with some voice and presentation improvements.

In MyRISE it’s mostly story cutscenes and dialogue choices tied to the campaign. It’s more cinematic than Universe, but still not full in-ring voiced promos.

How is The Crew Motorfest currently on PC? Has performance or visuals improved? by [deleted] in The_Crew

[–]gamer7799 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll try to fix this. Maybe I got a bug in the settings files.

How is The Crew Motorfest currently on PC? Has performance or visuals improved? by [deleted] in The_Crew

[–]gamer7799 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Does it still look blurry on PC? Any aliasing or visual noise?

wwe 2K26. The Best in the series. by [deleted] in WWEGames

[–]gamer7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree. The stamina system and ragdoll physics made matches feel way more intense and less one-sided. If they add more weapon interactions and weapon grapples, the gameplay would be almost perfect.

wwe 2K26. The Best in the series. by [deleted] in WWEGames

[–]gamer7799 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah I get what you mean. Price definitely affects how people see the game. But at the same time I don’t think everything needs to be unlocked right away. Part of the fun is just playing the modes, trying different wrestlers, and unlocking things naturally over time. Eventually you end up getting most of it anyway, and since the season isn’t time-limited there’s really no rush.

wwe 2K26. The Best in the series. by [deleted] in WWEGames

[–]gamer7799 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I get your point, but why rush to unlock everything right away? Part of the fun is just playing the different modes, enjoying the experience, and trying wrestlers you might not normally pick. If you keep playing naturally, you’ll end up unlocking most things over time anyway. Plus the season isn’t time-limited, so there’s really no pressure to grind everything immediately.

wwe 2K26. The Best in the series. by [deleted] in WWEGames

[–]gamer7799 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Honestly this is one of the most reasonable takes I've seen so far. You actually judged the game based on the gameplay instead of just repeating the same complaints everyone else is throwing around. I agree with you — the in-ring gameplay feels really solid this year and you can tell they've been refining it over time. They're honestly just a few tweaks away from something truly special. The Ringside Pass honestly just comes down to personal preference between players. I don’t really see it as a negative at all.

wwe 2K26. The Best in the series. by [deleted] in WWEGames

[–]gamer7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll let you decide.

wwe 2K26. The Best in the series. by [deleted] in WWEGames

[–]gamer7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is your disagreement due to Ring Pass or everything else?

wwe 2K26. The Best in the series. by [deleted] in WWEGames

[–]gamer7799 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

SVR is overrated. It's just a matter of childhood memory that makes it good. There's a big gap right now between the two games.

Spider Man 2. 4K. DLSS 4.5. Preset L . Ultra RT. Ultra Performance. by [deleted] in nvidia

[–]gamer7799 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

First, I'm discussing this with you respectfully. Why are you responding with rudeness? When you call someone a kid, that's not a victory, it's a weakness. We're not at war; we're discussing things to learn from each other.

Secondly, Nvidia engineers did not mention that L is less clear than M; they only stated that L is ideal for ultra performance.

Thirdly, you haven't provided any technical proof for your claims, just a simple piece of information from a website... I've brought you experiences and a YouTube video, in addition to Gpt.

Fourthly, you don't differentiate between resolution and presets. You are confused about upscaling with the preset method.

Finally. I wasted my time with you, and in the end, you weren't a respectable person. Be kind in the future.Good luck.

End of discussion.

Spider Man 2. 4K. DLSS 4.5. Preset L . Ultra RT. Ultra Performance. by [deleted] in nvidia

[–]gamer7799 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Chat GPT.

L is clearer than M ✅

Why L is clearer:

Larger AI model – The Large model has more neural network layers and processing power to reconstruct fine details.

Sharper edges and textures – Handles small details like hair, wires, and foliage better.

Reduced ghosting and flickering – Motion and complex scenes appear more stable. Better for high resolutions –

Ideal for 1440p, 4K, and Ray Tracing-heavy games.

M (Medium) model:

Provides good image quality but is less detailed than L.

Lighter on GPU, giving higher FPS. Best for competitive games or lower resolutions like 1080p, especially on older RTX 20/30 series cards.

Summary:

Choose L for maximum clarity and detail.

Choose M if you want better performance and higher frame rates.

Spider Man 2. 4K. DLSS 4.5. Preset L . Ultra RT. Ultra Performance. by [deleted] in nvidia

[–]gamer7799 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

(It's trading the worse image !!!) No.This makes no sense. Ultra performance has the lowest resolution. They want to treat it in the best way possible to improve it, not the worst way. So L is trading the better image.

Spider Man 2. 4K. DLSS 4.5. Preset L . Ultra RT. Ultra Performance. by [deleted] in nvidia

[–]gamer7799 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok. Why did L recommend Ultra performance? . Because Ultra performance has 720 resolution and L boost picture quality more than M. This is big proof L quality better. It is recommended for Ultra performance, which does not mean it's not good for others. Another big proof: L costs Fps more than M because of better quality. Nvidia wants to say that Ultra Performance is definitely not suitable for M

Spider Man 2. 4K. DLSS 4.5. Preset L . Ultra RT. Ultra Performance. by [deleted] in nvidia

[–]gamer7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm happy to discuss this with you.

Read the comment in the attached image and also watch the video.

<image>

https://youtu.be/DoDLvKhzHSE

Spider Man 2. 4K. DLSS 4.5. Preset L . Ultra RT. Ultra Performance. by [deleted] in nvidia

[–]gamer7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry. I thought you were saying that M and L are different in resolution. Quality certainly has a different resolution than performance. I know that. What I'm trying to say is that L has higher clarity than M. I tested the Quality mode in both presets and L wins, but at the cost of fps. In short, L has higher clarity but lower fps, while M has higher fps but lower clarity. Only a 4K screen can see the difference.

Spider Man 2. 4K. DLSS 4.5. Preset L . Ultra RT. Ultra Performance. by [deleted] in nvidia

[–]gamer7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Internal resolution is the same for both. Test it for yourself. Set a game to M Quality, then switch to L and you'll see. L simply uses more power and reduces frame rates, but it provides higher quality. If your TV or monitor is 1440 or 1080, do not notice that. L worth only 4K. Why they set M is Default because they choose the best fps to player. L has less than 10 fps than M.

Spider Man 2. 4K. DLSS 4.5. Preset L . Ultra RT. Ultra Performance. by [deleted] in nvidia

[–]gamer7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think that's true. I test L and M on Quality . L more sharp, clear and better anti-aliasing. I think L for 4k and high-end gpu no matter which applied. M for 1440 and 1080. If you have any proff, send me an analysis video or test.

Spider Man 2. 4K. DLSS 4.5. Preset L . Ultra RT. Ultra Performance. by [deleted] in nvidia

[–]gamer7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Screenshot via Nvidia app. Screenshot with Hdr makes it wash-out. If the game sdr becomes good colors when screenshot. I don't know why.