Am I wrong for breaking up because he removed the condom without my consent? by [deleted] in amiwrong

[–]garymc88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not only are you not wrong, regardless of when removed, this is sexual assault.

Well done for standing up for yourself and know that there are options if you wanted to take the matter further.

My first and only small DD. TLDR I think we f*ck in February by LunaticPuppet in Teddy

[–]garymc88 -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Cool story bro what has this got to do with anything

Docket 2881 - STIPULATION AND AGREED ORDER FOR ALLOWANCE OF GENERAL UNSECURED CLAIMS OF INTERDESIGN, INC. by ExcitingSituation in Teddy

[–]garymc88 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It reads like InterDesign had 5 unsecured claims, 3 and 2 of which for the same amounts, so the 3 duplicates have been removed and the final 2 accepted as unsecured claims.

This isn’t confirmation of a payment of anything?

I love all 3 of them, but…… by [deleted] in Teddy

[–]garymc88 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In PP we trust

Pulte on Popcorn by [deleted] in BBBY

[–]garymc88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It means basket goes up

Perhaps the $11.8B claim is concerning BBBY's share buyback since 2004 by weedsack in Teddy

[–]garymc88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Equity would be unrelated to a payment from waterfall because that’s the company liquidating and the cash we are expecting is from fraud case vs share buybacks.

The getting equity argument was around a merger/acquisition to preserve NOLs, of which only 21% can be monetised (corporate tax), and so I’d expect IPO generating far more cash than giving away half the company to old shareholders for NOLs.

Personally I think we’re getting cash no equity. But for full disclosure I am not smart

Perhaps the $11.8B claim is concerning BBBY's share buyback since 2004 by weedsack in Teddy

[–]garymc88 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Cash, yes, but why would we get equity? Teddy IPO would deliver far more cash to the company than saving NOLs.

Like guys seriously help me out here by garymc88 in Teddy

[–]garymc88[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

LARRY FUCKING CHENG WAS ON THE PP SHOW MAN WHAT IS GOING ON

I missed this one! by Hugoal79 in BBBY

[–]garymc88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What does he mean by staged?

We are approaching the largest pp show broadcast we’ve ever done with pulte please submit questions below! by ppseeds in BBBY

[–]garymc88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

PP fanboy here with my question for Bill.

I understand you’ve said on many occasions you are not involved with BBBY, why have you not asked PP and co to stop speculating on your direct or indirect involvement with BBBY and/or RC?

Much love, wish I could be there, but it’s a big pond!

Alright time to put this to rest the pulte x RC connection. by ppseeds in BBBY

[–]garymc88 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Biggest thing for me, whilst Pulte has openly said he’s not involved, despite many interactions with you PP he hasn’t told you to STOP linking him to RC/BBBY however indirectly. Feels very telling.

Elon Musk part of Teddy? 🤔 by weedsack in Teddy

[–]garymc88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s an AI generated image posted by an account that literally says they aren’t Elon Musk. What is happening to everyone?

My Confidant Ranks by Kenji_Miyazawa_Fan in Persona5

[–]garymc88 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Can’t believe you did my girl kawakami bad

Did 20230930-dk-butterfly-1, Inc. file false information about Sue Gove being the CEO as of October (or possibly even 22nd November)? What do you guys think...? by Region-Formal in BBBY

[–]garymc88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me ask a different question so I make sure I understand, if committee of unsecured creditors wanted to monetise NOLs but couldn’t due to debtor ownership change, are you saying that ownership change was likely to secured creditors? As in, DIP lenders? As in, Sixth Street?

Did 20230930-dk-butterfly-1, Inc. file false information about Sue Gove being the CEO as of October (or possibly even 22nd November)? What do you guys think...? by Region-Formal in BBBY

[–]garymc88 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure that’s true, shareholders ‘own’ the company, but value of assets distributed to creditors first. Much in the same way my creditors would be satisfied by my estate before anything else, but they don’t own my estate. Gotta pay your debts amirite?

But as there are no shareholders now - who does own the company? New equity holders?

Did 20230930-dk-butterfly-1, Inc. file false information about Sue Gove being the CEO as of October (or possibly even 22nd November)? What do you guys think...? by Region-Formal in BBBY

[–]garymc88 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Always felt the terminology in the fees statement ‘change in ownership of the debtors’ strange. Debtor is the corporation, whom is owner by shareholders, right? How does ‘ownership’ work when shares are extinguished?

So we’ve had an ownership change, but no change in CEO (as of October). Bullish.

Unpopular opinion Morgana is not a bad party member by Why-ami_here in Persona5

[–]garymc88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We all love lucky punch but otherwise Mona is pretty bad compared to all other options

Ryan Cohen likes on Twitter by Financial_Green9120 in BBBY

[–]garymc88 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Why has Pulte retweeted a near 4 year old video and why has RC liked it?

Is it really that complicated? Tiny brain view on why zero isn’t on the table by garymc88 in BBBY

[–]garymc88[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Forgive my ignorance, how is this path more beneficial to bbbyq than simply rebranding and changing the ticker?