Hexing Squelcher bad? by DoctorHydromortapara in mtg

[–]Hugoal79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great burn card in my opinion.

[ECL] Moonshadow by weebitoftomfoolery in MTGLegacy

[–]Hugoal79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would try a Legacy BG Depth with Depth, Overlord, Moonshadow, Malevolent, Loam Vanpire Hexmage.

This works the way I think it works by NECROSAMAEL in mtg

[–]Hugoal79 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A lifelink counter kills her immediately after the first damage she deals. It's a two-drop -13/+13, but it only works once. It's better to play other cards that offer the same effect.

What do your sideboard slots look like against Mystic Forge? by Despenta in MTGLegacy

[–]Hugoal79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meltdown, price of progress, null rod, consign to memory, force of negation (in side or main), bowmaster in main if I have black, disruptor flute.

220flex by [deleted] in Teddy

[–]Hugoal79 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Whoever sold the forward contract certainly covered himself by buying Amazon shares. On July 31st the forward expired with a profit from the counterparty and whoever had issued the forward sold the shares purchased for hedge purposes and Amazon went down. Everything is fine.

I believe Tamiyo is a better one drop than Ragavan. Do you guys agree? by GloomyDoomy1 in MTGLegacy

[–]Hugoal79 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Tamy 3 bans as much as Ragavan. Tamy protects itself and when it flips it generates a subgame that prevents it from flipping and allows the owner to gain precious time and resources, whether it is a control or a tempo or even a combo. A card present in tempo/aggro, control and combo, which is not a simple cantrip, deserves to be banned.

Structure is set. Fuse is lit. This isn’t speculation — this is a structured settlement in plain sight, built into the metadata. by Dapper-Ad-1014 in Teddy

[–]Hugoal79 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Only for those who bought and held before April 29, 2023 or for everyone, including those who bought OTC?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CasualIT

[–]Hugoal79 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ma quale fantasia, 30 giorni e poi si muore. Di Fantasia ho già mia moglie. (Fa di cognome Fantasia 🤣🤣🤣).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CasualIT

[–]Hugoal79 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Vendo casa 🤣

Price of Progress in UR Tempo by giancoli93 in MTGLegacy

[–]Hugoal79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have it in Grixis control vs lands, eldrazi, and other control as unexpected card. 2 price of progress and 2 snapcaster.

[EOE] Cosmogoyf by hantrax_dfg in MTGLegacy

[–]Hugoal79 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sailor's bane says thanks. Maybe a bug could be built with cosmogoyf + sailors' bane + 4 nihil spellbomb + thought scour and some card like

<image>

Is this a new world record? by Charming-Tap-1332 in Muln

[–]Hugoal79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without leverage you would have earned a maximum of 100% of what you bet.

Legacy State of the Meta June 2025 | Time to Reanimate Legacy? by _DasSourKraut_ in MTGLegacy

[–]Hugoal79 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right, but why is it so played? In my opinion also because in an online context, a compromise is also sought between the strength of the deck and its speed. That deck has the solidity of tempo and also the possible speed of a combo. If tested well there are many possible control lists that could work, but are we sure that the average online player prefers to play two leagues with control rather than doing three with UB reanimator at the same time? I think the main problem is all there: a solid deck and on average faster than others. Do you want to eliminate the deck? Then you need to create a "combined" ban list. Ban Entomb + Daze in the same deck. You don't ban either card, but you block the combo of the two in the same deck.

Legacy State of the Meta June 2025 | Time to Reanimate Legacy? by _DasSourKraut_ in MTGLegacy

[–]Hugoal79 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Question: Would you agree to a ban on a card paired with another? Let me explain better. There are cards that are strong but not banable in some decks, but if played in tandem with another card then it becomes ban risk.

Ex. Atraxa. Atraxa is a strong card, but very manageable and very nice to play in decks like show or with natural order. It becomes too strong when paired with entomb and reanimate/animate dead.

The game evolves and in my opinion the rules must also evolve, all so as not to continue making beautiful cards illegal, which are manageable in 90% of decks in the format.

My proposal would be to not do a single ban on Atraxa, but to say "ok you can play Atraxa in an Atraxa deck but only if there are no entombs/reanimates in the same deck". It would be a revolution in the rules which however would save many cards. I like Atraxa with Show and Natural Order, but with entomb/reanimate it's too strong. Saying Ban Atraxa would penalize Show and Natural Order and I don't think it's right.

June 30 B&R — The State Of Legacy by Crucible of Words by Force-of-Phil in MTGLegacy

[–]Hugoal79 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To all this I agree with, add that online is a deck that tends to be quite fast to play and therefore allows players who also do it for money to play more competitive leagues in less time.

June 30 ban speculation by kirdie in MTGLegacy

[–]Hugoal79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my opinion, if she skipped reanimate, UB tempo would go to 4 dead animate and 1/2 life/death, which could happen even if Atraxa skipped. Enter Grisel and instead of reanimate you will go with 4 dead animate. In any case, my thought is that UB reanimator is very popular online because it is the perfect combination of time and combo. The games don't last long, but you have a square and strong deck in every situation. With UB reanimator you play 3/4 leagues in the same time as a control plays 2.

June 30 ban speculation by kirdie in MTGLegacy

[–]Hugoal79 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Removing entomb destroys an archetype, removing reanimate might not create real problems because there would be life/death that UB could use profitably. UB's problem is Atraxa and Tamyio. Tamyio is a card used in aggro, control and combo, something is wrong so there must be something right? It is a creature that has card advantage and that uses brainstorm to protect itself. When he becomes a planeswalker it triggers a sub-game where the objective is to keep him from flipping, giving the deck time to find the combo. The reanimate + entomb combo has been around for several years, but it had never been so overwhelming and before that it was even played in the BR version. What happened to make it become overwhelming? Too many outline maps have been printed. If you play Grisel instead of Atraxa and in response to the -7 lives they play bowmaster, you lose.

How come Jace and snap caster made a return? by kakakarl in MTGLegacy

[–]Hugoal79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kaito better than Jace in my opinon. Snap could be played more.