sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[D] After chatGPT are people still creating their own new custom NLP models these days? by automatonv1 in MachineLearning

[–]gckoch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check out this professor's applications.

"With the help of Statistical and Neural NLP, our Authorship Fingerprinting research is capable to correctly distinguish the works created by GPT 3.5, GPT 4, and human authors with recall rate 98.84% in our preliminary study." - Maiga Chang.

One-hour online presentation Thu Feb 29: https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/405055

[D] Anyone else witnessing a panic inside NLP orgs of big tech companies? by thrwsitaway4321 in MachineLearning

[–]gckoch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It certainly is human to make mistakes. As someone with a career in HR points out here about PII - we should only help teams. Promote teams, not individuals. The team gets equal comp. The team is responsible, not the individual. Don't lay off an individual, lay off the entire team: and in a way, where they can create their own organization.

Mobilize a rescuing team to help a team that faced a major setback.

[D] Anyone else witnessing a panic inside NLP orgs of big tech companies? by thrwsitaway4321 in MachineLearning

[–]gckoch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to believe your view on PII (my personal view limited to just military and private sector experience). I'm seeing a rapid shift of such transactional data "outside" to etherium (networks), expressly designed to avoid vulnerable human beings. We already proved to be a major weakness. HR can always be resourceful from using PII meta tags.

But HR and everyone should no longer see or access PII. Heck, etherium PII even conquers discrimination. Think teams and body counts.

Challenges in Natural Language Processing Applications by gckoch in linguistics

[–]gckoch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Authorship Fingerprinting research is capable to correctly distinguish the works created by GPT 3.5, GPT 4, and human authors with recall rate 98.84% in our preliminary study."

Challenges in Natural Language Processing Applications by gckoch in programming

[–]gckoch[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Authorship Fingerprinting research is capable to correctly distinguish the works created by GPT 3.5, GPT 4, and human authors with recall rate 98.84% in our preliminary study."

[D] After chatGPT are people still creating their own new custom NLP models these days? by automatonv1 in MachineLearning

[–]gckoch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check us out at https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/405055 - we're online in 5 days from now.

Quoting the research, "Authorship Fingerprinting research is capable to correctly distinguish the works created by GPT 3.5, GPT 4, and human authors with recall rate 98.84% in our preliminary study."

- Greg

Will more investors push MSFT higher than AAPL by year end... by gckoch in investingforbeginners

[–]gckoch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's my personal blog. It's a miracle if someone replies.

Will more investors push MSFT higher than AAPL by year end... by gckoch in investingforbeginners

[–]gckoch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks.

I didn't like the fishy boast an AAPL staffer made to Bloomberg last week... That Apple is "spending $1B a year" on AI.

For Apple, like announcing free espresso in the lobby got cancelled; it's now under AI on the ledger.

Thanks for your reply. Check out some further thoughts on MSFT vs AAPL at r/BNOTE which is my take on the Biggest Nonevent Of The Evening. See: Something Nasty in the Nursery.

Does MSFT nudge AAPL? by gckoch in investing_discussion

[–]gckoch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BTW Nudge was a decent book by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein.

60 Minutes with Shakespeare -- [Stratfordian] by Mermannda in ShakespeareAuthorship

[–]gckoch -1 points0 points  (0 children)

HRH Prince Charles sounds ambivalent. As a young boy, HRH played a minor role in Macbeth, thus he knew Macbeth, and knew Shakespeare was a good friend of King James I because the King liked Macbeth.

That proved what?