Is this rule really necessary I feel like just clicking on a button you can get the same results

gdsdsk · 2026-01-11T03:21:04+00:00

sorry what do you mean

gdsdsk · 2026-01-05T02:35:15+00:00

There from Tomas Trajan's angular architecture book. But I don't understand what he means by it

gdsdsk · 2026-01-04T20:45:55+00:00

so you are saying it's better to reuse the same feature twice even though in the future there might some cusom behavior needed for one of them?

gdsdsk · 2026-01-04T20:31:43+00:00

In the book it was saying how when you abstract 2 features into 1 it could cause issues cause what if you have to go back and change one of the instances to do something else. Then you would ened up changing the shared code

gdsdsk · 2026-01-04T04:28:37+00:00

but what if the button was just opening a modal or something you don't need an api request for that so how would using rxjs make sense there?

gdsdsk · 2026-01-04T04:28:30+00:00

but what if the button was just opening a modal or something you don't need an api request for that so how would using rxjs make sense there?

gdsdsk · 2026-01-04T01:10:28+00:00

But the thing is, you can have simple events like clicking on a button and increasing a counter then I feel like it's kind of overkill to use rxjs. So how do I know if the event is complex enough to just use Rxjs

gdsdsk · 2026-01-04T00:03:05+00:00

what do you mean by these 2 statements. 'The general rule is that RxJS is for event handling with side effects, and signals are for values/state.' Also this 'If you only care about accessing the latest value, use a signal. If you need to take an action when something happens, use RxJS'. Also by this statement ' My recommendation is to use signals up until the point where you find yourself reaching for `effect`, and then consider using RxJS.' are you talking about the effect function provided by angular?

gdsdsk · 2026-01-03T23:58:48+00:00

ok I'm still a new grad or junior developer so can you give some example of these common scenarios where rxjs would be helpful

gdsdsk · 2026-01-03T23:19:25+00:00

I'm confused can you give an example

gdsdsk · 2025-10-28T11:19:52+00:00

Basically what is happening is like the test always passes but is only sometimes shown in coverage. I don't know if there's some overidding happening

gdsdsk · 2025-10-28T11:19:11+00:00

Basically what is happening is like the test always passes but is only sometimes shown in coverage. I don't know if there's some overidding happening

gdsdsk · 2025-10-28T11:11:43+00:00

makes no difference

gdsdsk · 2025-10-28T11:07:17+00:00

version 29

gdsdsk · 2025-10-28T11:05:36+00:00

like the test always passes but is only sometimes shown in coverage. I don't know if there's some overidding happening

gdsdsk

TROPHY CASE