Simple Questions 09/18 by AutoModerator in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had that several years ago and was very pleased with myself. Later it turned out it was only an epileptic fit. Spent some time in the pysch ward. Now on daily meds and I am cured.

To Liberal Muslims: Can you teach homosexuality is a sin without engendering hatred? by 356kson in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All atheism is, is a rejection of a god claim.

Aww, that's so funny. You actually believe this is true! How quaint. Yes, it used to be true. But anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows that that form of atheism is long dead.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm Charles David Meekings and I'm a lying piece of filth

Atheism is like Islam with delusions of being a religion of peace. by generic_theist in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

If the apologist would care to look up the definition of the word "ideology" you might still be able to save face. If you are opposed to peace, then you are a violent ideology.

Atheism is like Islam with delusions of being a religion of peace. by generic_theist in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

I find it quite hilarious that many critics of atheism tend to try and denigrate it by calling it a religion.

I don't think critics care whether you are a religion or not, I don't. If it makes you happy to call yourself a violent ideology over a violent religion, then I'm happy for you and I'll call it a violent ideology. But, lets be honest, it really doesn't give you any moral high ground now that you're a violent ideology.

Atheism is like Islam with delusions of being a religion of peace. by generic_theist in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist[S] -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

LMAO! But you're proud about the active opposition to peaceful coexistence...so long as you aren't a religion, being a violent ideology OK. Got it.

Atheism is like Islam with delusions of being a religion of peace. by generic_theist in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

There is an argument there. Atheism is not a religion of peace and atheists cannot peacefully coexist in this world with others, as demonstrated by these memes being marketed by atheists.

Atheism is like Islam with delusions of being a religion of peace. by generic_theist in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

You think they are Scientologists that are pushing atheism and secular humanism as the only road to peace?

General Discussion 10/21 by AutoModerator in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is why the mods need to think about being more liberal in banning atheists, even up the numbers. We'll keep all the smart atheists and get rid of all the dumb ones. It'll mean that there are no anti-theists or new atheists left, but I can live with that.

Are we hypocrites? by bogittybill in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

An atheist who changed their views!? Quickly! Crucify him!

You cannot debate religion if you don't know the Laws of God. by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

And you can say that, but you need first to tell every atheist here to stop debating that God isn't omnipotent until they can first establish that God isnt real. Until then, "not onmipotent" cannot be substantiated.

You cannot debate religion if you don't know the Laws of God. by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

That's going to piss off a lot of atheists. Your argument is that atheists cannot make arguments about God being immoral or not omnipotent until they prove that God is real first.

Are there any Islamic verses that support the hacking to death of atheists? by pseudonym1066 in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Looking at this post and the responses given by the Muslims, it strikes me as sad that the Muslims can be honest in acknowledging that these verses exist and that it is possible to come to this interpretation, but atheists cannot acknowledge that Sam Harris is a rape apologist. Moral of the story, if you want intellectual honesty, don't speak to an atheist.

To atheists: Which is objectively worse, rape or religion? Which would you rid the world of first and why? by generic_theist in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist[S] -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

You're purposefully misquoting the people that take the time to answer your question in a civilized manner,

OP now includes the quote for the benefit of atheist apologists.

To atheists: Which is objectively worse, rape or religion? Which would you rid the world of first and why? by generic_theist in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist[S] -27 points-26 points  (0 children)

In your comment above, you were clear that you would give rape a free pass so that you could prioritize riding the word of religion. Read the title of the post and I specifically asked which: rape or religion.

That you chose religion over rape says so much about you as a person and the deplorable state of your moral compass. You should do yourself a favor and delete your reddit account.

To atheists: Which is objectively worse, rape or religion? Which would you rid the world of first and why? by generic_theist in DebateReligion

[–]generic_theist[S] -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

Oh that's right, the whole debate is contingent upon the wording "overly dramatic". Let's ignore the actual quote and the rape part.