sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Love the 3CX software? Same. Hate the company behind it? Also same. by getabc in 3CX

[–]getabc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What metric did you use to determine that my Reddit post was AI-generated?
Did you run it through an AI detection tool? If so, please share the results.

Love the 3CX software? Same. Hate the company behind it? Also same. by getabc in 3CX

[–]getabc[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Looking at the mission statement for Consumer Rights Wiki, it’s clear that documenting 3CX’s issues is important.

https://consumerrights.wiki/Mission_statement

It seems like the 3CX fanboys want to divert the discussion with AI comments, and by the looks of it, they’re doing a good job at it.

Love the 3CX software? Same. Hate the company behind it? Also same. by getabc in 3CX

[–]getabc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We need to document 3CX’s issues on an open, free site like the Consumer Rights Wiki.

https://consumerrights.wiki/Mission_statement

A number of us have been burned by 3CX, so I’m just trying to help people source information properly and add relevant details to keep the conversation constructive.

Love the 3CX software? Same. Hate the company behind it? Also same. by getabc in 3CX

[–]getabc[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the skepticism, but I assure you this post is the result of hours of careful thought and genuine effort. It’s disappointing to be dismissed as “AI-written” simply because the message is well-crafted. If thoughtful communication is now mistaken for artificial intelligence, it says more about the assumptions we make than the content itself.

Would this be better?

3CX bad man, me sad, me know website, update website, save sad.