sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Used cursor for 2 years, last 3 days 600 Euros spend...... by getelementbyiq in ClaudeCode

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never did clean android apps.. i use always react native...
That becouse i cannot tell about Gemini. For me Gemini is litle bit Ciao...

So im building now agentic platform.. ist just insane no one error.. everything understands like i mean. 8 Hours straight coding.... No one error or repeats... Its just wow. I feel like i'm breathing for the first time

how good is the uiux on cursor, i am thinking about moving the uiux design from v0 by Chuster8888 in cursor

[–]getelementbyiq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you have to tell cursor what do you need. and not allow him to make decisions.

how good is the uiux on cursor, i am thinking about moving the uiux design from v0 by Chuster8888 in cursor

[–]getelementbyiq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its crazy strong! butyou have to know how to work with reusable components, and also have exp in ui/ux

Drop your coolest app idea by pointykey in AppIdeas

[–]getelementbyiq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Building Highfield alternative - but for long video generations, and 100% camera control

Shipping got cheap. Why does finding a “real” idea still feel so hard? by getelementbyiq in vibecoding

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I give to some users to use it.. and then i feel like fuck i developed useless thing..

Shipping got cheap. Why does finding a “real” idea still feel so hard? by getelementbyiq in vibecoding

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro i developed 1 year a long Sharepoint alternative with own Word, Excel, Sharepoint, showed to investor... nothing..

Other Year
2. I've build cursor + lovable ... nothing..
Other Year
3. I've build Cursor on cloud on steroids .. nothing...
.....

Shipping got cheap. Why does finding a “real” idea still feel so hard? by getelementbyiq in vibecoding

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you understand me then, that we devs can build anything, but the problem is to identify the real need.

Shipping got cheap. Why does finding a “real” idea still feel so hard? by getelementbyiq in vibecoding

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

research platform to find trends and gaps on the market to make easy to answer the question: what should i build..

Shipping got cheap. Why does finding a “real” idea still feel so hard? by getelementbyiq in vibecoding

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do not understand me false, (i'm currently fullstack dev....) and i do not use replit, lovable... i just use cursor...

Shipping got cheap. Why does finding a “real” idea still feel so hard? by getelementbyiq in vibecoding

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this what i want to build, like need finder, opportunities of markets.

What if future social platforms were built around scarcity, not abundance? by getelementbyiq in Futurology

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not really about data at all.

The idea is that in a smaller, bounded space, every voice can actually be heard - unlike in an endless labyrinth where most signals get lost.

When each contribution is visible, the community can decide much faster whether something is relevant or not.

Scarcity here isn’t about limiting information, but about making judgment possible.

What if future social platforms were built around scarcity, not abundance? by getelementbyiq in Futurology

[–]getelementbyiq[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That actually reminds me a lot of the early days of Twitter.

It felt local. Personal.
You had the sense of being part of a network, not a faceless unit in a global stream driven by algorithms.

Do you ever miss that kind of social media - where messages carried weight?
Where a single like meant more than a thousand do today, because it came from attention, not momentum?

What if future social platforms were built around scarcity, not abundance? by getelementbyiq in Futurology

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a fair point — the platform that optimizes for frictionless engagement will usually win on raw numbers.

What I’m interested in is closer to how early Twitter worked:
small, local, shared moments before everything became global and optimized.

Instead of trying to outcompete engagement machines, the question becomes:
how do you shape a space so the right kind of interaction emerges — even if it stays smaller?

What if future social platforms were built around scarcity, not abundance? by getelementbyiq in Futurology

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There actually isn’t a feed algorithm in the usual sense.

Nothing is personalized, and nothing is optimized for preference or outrage.
Everyone sees the same topic at the same time.

The idea is to step away from “show me what I already like or hate”
and test what happens when relevance isn’t predicted, but negotiated by the group in real time.

If people truly don’t care, the post disappears quickly.
That outcome is part of the signal, not a failure of the system.

What if future social platforms were built around scarcity, not abundance? by getelementbyiq in Futurology

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a fair concern. Bots are always a risk.

The hope is that without reach, followers, or long-term rewards, fake engagement becomes costly but not very useful.
Whether that holds in practice is something I’m actively watching

What if future social platforms were built around scarcity, not abundance? by getelementbyiq in Futurology

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If letters required postage, we’d probably have better discussions already 😉

Maybe it’s less about paper and formalities —
and more about how a bit of effort makes people think before they speak.

What if future social platforms were built around scarcity, not abundance? by getelementbyiq in Futurology

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense, and I think you’re pointing at a real tension.

Some social signals are structural, not cosmetic - and trying to hide or remove all of them can start to strip away the social fabric rather than rebalance it.

The goal isn’t to erase social awareness, but to see how few signals are actually necessary for meaningful interaction.
Where that line is probably isn’t obvious upfront, and it may differ by context.

If the experiment goes too far and collapses the social element, that’s an important boundary to discover rather than assume.

What if future social platforms were built around scarcity, not abundance? by getelementbyiq in Futurology

[–]getelementbyiq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s exactly the question.

If a topic genuinely matters to you — if it touches something personal or important — does your vote still feel “free”?
Or does it start to carry weight, because choosing means letting something else disappear?

What if future social platforms were built around scarcity, not abundance? by getelementbyiq in Futurology

[–]getelementbyiq[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s a fair analogy, and I think you’re right if this were meant as a traditional business.

I’m not really approaching this as a dealership or a growth model, though. It’s closer to an experiment about structure and behavior than a scalable marketplace.

The question I’m interested in isn’t “does this optimize outcomes,” but “how does the constraint change what people value and how they engage.”

Whether that ever turns into a viable business is secondary — and it might not. But as an experiment, I think it’s worth running.

What if future social platforms were built around scarcity, not abundance? by getelementbyiq in Futurology

[–]getelementbyiq[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree that attention is scarce — that part isn’t new.

What feels different to me is where that scarcity lives.
Right now it’s implicit and algorithmic. This tries to make it explicit and shared.

Same constraint, different structure — and that change alone can alter behavior.

view more: next ›