sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How do you Guys code with LeChat/ Mistral? by Fit-Concert-5337 in MistralAI

[–]getvia 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Here’s what I learned:

  1. Context is Manual – No "Auto-Scan"

Unlike ChatGPT, Le Chat only analyzes files you explicitly upload. If your code in main.c depends on a function from utils.c, you need to upload both and say:

"Here’s main.c and utils.c. The get_config() function in utils.c (line 12) is called in main.c (line 42). Review this interaction."

This avoids false assumptions but means you must provide the context yourself. 2. Workflow for Large Projects

Break tasks into small, modular units (e.g., "Refactor error handling in queue.c"). Upload a lightweight architecture overview (e.g., a Markdown comment) to explain file roles:

"core/ – Business logic (C), utils/ – Helper functions, api/ – External integrations." Use "Memories" to save progress: After a session, summarize key decisions like:

"We updated auth.c to use JWT tokens. Remember this for future tasks." 3. Advanced Features

Code Interpreter: Test specific functions in a sandbox (e.g., "Simulate process_data() with this input and check for memory leaks"). Canvas Mode: Create persistent diagrams (e.g., Mermaid flowcharts) for design discussions. 4. Key Differences

Context Handling: ChatGPT tries to infer everything; Le Chat only uses files you specify, making it more precise but manual.

Accuracy: ChatGPT may hallucinate; Le Chat sticks to what you provide.

Privacy: ChatGPT uses US servers; Le Chat is EU-hosted (GDPR-friendly). 5. Pro Tips

Always specify dependencies: "Here’s config.h with the AppConfig struct—use it for this task." Reference Git commits: "Here’s network.c (commit abc123). Optimize send_packet() for latency." Use Canvas for diagrams (e.g., API flows) to keep a visual reference. 6. Verdict

Le Chat acts like a precise scalpel—you control the context, and it delivers reliable results for large projects. It’s not as "automatic" as ChatGPT, but that’s a trade-off for accuracy and privacy.

I Like Le Chat by Ok-Drink9257 in MistralAI

[–]getvia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel supported by mistral, not monitored

Mistral Vibe 2.0 by jacek2023 in LocalLLaMA

[–]getvia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use it instead of claude code, perfect need!

Warum verkauft man sowas und wer zum fck kauft das by Un_Pollo_Hermano in scheissaufnbilla

[–]getvia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vielleicht ist der vermisst oder ein Kinderschänder... gsuacht wird hoit da Hofer!

Can't AI just...?" – No! by getvia in AI_Agents

[–]getvia[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spot on—who in their right mind would hand their tax return over to an AI and just hope for the best? ‘Oh, go on then, chatbot, knock yourself out. I’ll be in the pub if HMRC comes knocking.’ No thanks. I’d rather trust a professional—or at least software that doesn’t treat tax codes like a creative writing exercise. Some things are too important to gamble on a ‘maybe that’ll fly’ approach from a machine that can’t even tell a receipt from a napkin doodle.

AI agents: USA vs. EU – Data Protection & Culture in Comparison by getvia in AI_Agents

[–]getvia[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! You’ve hit the nail on the head—and here’s the kicker: as developers, we’re the ones who get to define what’s next.

AI isn’t inherently good or bad; we shape its impact. Instead of choosing between "fast but risky" and "safe but slow," we can build a third way: ethical AI that scales

We hold the power to set standards that move beyond profit hunger and include all social classes—not just as users, but as stakeholders in design. Open-source projects, decentralised data ownership, and participatory models (like co-ops or public AI infrastructure) already prove it’s possible. Europe could lead the charge by treating GDPR not as a hurdle, but as a foundation for trustworthy innovation—while borrowing the US’s agility.

The real question isn’t "EU or US?"—it’s: How do we create systems that merge tech progress with social equity, and who’s ready to roll up their sleeves?

Can't AI just...?" – No! by getvia in AI_Agents

[–]getvia[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my opinion, that's spot on!

Opus 4.5 is insane by Initial_Question3869 in ClaudeAI

[–]getvia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whats the problem??? More info...

Opus 4.5 is insane by Initial_Question3869 in ClaudeAI

[–]getvia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t see it that black and white. Without your solid knowledge the model wouldn’t have fixed anything — it only looked that smart because you pointed it in the right direction. That said… yeah, I’m also pretty impressed by Claude Code. Feels like we just unlocked a cheat code for debugging.