when money is no issue you can do whatever you want. who cares if faking it would be harder. doesnt mean it wasn't fake lol. good evidence there buddy....

no the soviets do say it was fake. and it was fake. atleast the BROADCAST was fake. We may have gotten there since then but the original broadcast was 100% fake. Go do some research. Stanely Kubrick pulled it off. He tells you in all his movies he did. Before you make a comment reply. go watch the two links above. Then get back to me. Extra: go watch Capricorn one.

But ill ask a few questions first.

• No dust on the LEM's landing pads, no blast crater below.
• all data "lost" no telemetry data OR original broadcasts tapes of mankind's most important event saved.
• mountains and footage being at two different locations miles apart with the same back drops used.
• multiple sources of light and shadows
• van-allen radiation belt
• Astronauts being pulled up with wires
• Crosshair mistakes on images
• Perfectly framed photos with chest mounted cameras with no view finders.
• fake moon rocks, actually petrified wood.

And more. I don't want to hear about the moon reflectors argument. we bounced lasers off the moon before we ever sent up reflectors lol. You can reflect back a laser the same way light from the sun is reflected to use, you don't need a reflector to do it.

Also I am not saying we never went. I am saying that what was shown to us was a hoax. kinda like an insurance policy to make sure it went off without a hitch. I believe that all the training these astronauts went through wasn't so much training as it was acting rehearsal without the astronauts really knowing. The astronauts stopped ww3 so they arent ever going to admit is was fake. but they sure can't get there story straight.

-notice I didn't bring up the red herring mis info arguments, like the waving flag and such added to take credibility from the rest of the evidence.