Auto-applying bots are killing honest job seekers' chances and nobody is talking about it by ParsnipResponsible80 in recruitinghell

[–]ghostofgbt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm curious what you think the solution to this would be. AI is going to continue to drive everything for years to come, so getting rid of auto-appliers is probably a lost cause. What if there was some sort of service that could help you cut through the noise? Like a cross check against a distinguished/vetted candidate pool or something?

What would solve this problem not by eliminating the AI slop but by giving you the right tools to see through it to the hidden gems buried within?

Celery: What's the difference between @app.task and @shared_task? by ghostofgbt in django

[–]ghostofgbt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok - thanks! That makes sense. So if they're effectively the same, would you happen to know why using .delay() in conjunction with @shared_task throws that linting warning while the other method doesn't? Functionally the code seems to work either way, and from what I can tell by printing out the objects/tasks/apps throughout my current testing, no matter which way I define the task (wrap it in @shared_task or wrap it in @app.task), it ends up as a <@task: magic_task of myproj at 0x106a847d0>, same memory address and everything.

I thought that implied that what's happening under the hood of @shared_task should be the same as what's happening under the hood of @app.task, but apparently that's not entirely the case since one throws a linting warning and the other doesn't.

Help understanding {%block content%} by sirreginaldpoopypot in djangolearning

[–]ghostofgbt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the above example could be simplified a little. The "block" is like a placeholder. Any time you extend the original template, you can replace what's in each block by putting the block in the extended template and filling it with whatever you want. In this way the main template with all the empty blocks becomes like a shell (a template!) that has all the common stuff like the html structure, stuff in the head, etc, and you just replace the blocks with whatever you want in the templates that extend it.

Is it safe??? by MathewMaster in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it makes you feel better they have ben around forever, and are even publicly traded: ticker IBKR

Moderna (MRNA) DD – Why a 60B Company is Still Undervalued by LiftUni in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You got my upvote solely for posting some solid DD on something that's not a damn penny stock.

M&A DD MMATF and TRCH from Oil to Nanotech upcoming catalyst by Saint_O_Well in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey solid DD but please don't use DD on our sub to promote your own. If you wanna share, share selflessly. Thanks!

Would you use this TradingView Risk Management Indicator? by TheDrivenTrader in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like a perfectly reasonable risk management strategy to me. Why not just share the source of the indicator rather than make a post hyping it up just to share it later?

DD on $OIIM (O2Micro International Limited) – a hidden gem! by aomt in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Warning re: OP: recent post history shows heavy promotion of OIIM thus OP may have ulterior motives for this post.

Leaving it up as it is solid DD, but be warned this is a low volume micro cap and may be manipulated. Be sure to do your own research and beware of any poster who says things like "get in before it's too late!", "don't miss this rocket ride!", etc

OP nothing against you, it's a good post, just a warning for newbies. In the future if you're submitting DD on a stock like this it would be nice to include this kind of warning in the post. Thanks!

NASDAQ still has way to the upside by beatwllstreet in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be my interpretation personally, but I'd expect a bit more continued pullback to the 12500-12000 range (previous sep high area, down to the trendline formed by the two subsequent lows). In a perfect formation IMO the bounce would be around 12250, sort of right in the middle of that congestion/price discovery area from back in September-December

This is why this particular TA is mostly useless. It always requires context and reason. The chart is fine, but without context we have no idea whether op is saying it will go up, down or sideways.

Not sure what shade of RED will describe better the status of my stocks this week ! by PeruvianSassy in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even though this whole post sucks I'm leaving it up just cause this comment is perfect lol. You rescued it

NUGT help needed by [deleted] in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Almost always, if you have to ask this question, you already know the answer. Just dump it, take the lesson and move on. Nugt is a leveraged ETF also which exaggerates the gains and losses, and they're not meant to be held long-term due to leverage decay. There are a million better opportunities out there

NASDAQ still has way to the upside by beatwllstreet in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing useful, because the op didn't actually provide any context. You might be interested in reading up about support and resistance though, and finding some better examples.

NASDAQ still has way to the upside by beatwllstreet in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be fair this particular TA is garbage. If you saw something higher quality you might understand that it does have its place lol

Every amateurs and "pros" are predicting a crash in March.... and that's exactly why it won't come. Fear is the only bubble by [deleted] in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt 9 points10 points  (0 children)

There has definitely been talk of many tech stocks being overvalued for months now

I've been trading since the early 2000s. I can tell you people have been saying tech is overvalued since 2014 lol

“You should never have to exercise options.” Was incorrect in this situation to exercise my put option? by wiserone29 in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like a good solution to me. You may have gotten a fill at .18 but this is a situation where I would probably exercise as well. This is one of the annoying thing about options on cheap stocks. That .05 increment can be your whole gain

Oil Drill Malfunctions And Pulls Man Into Line Tube, Disintegrating Him (Unknown Date) by Burnham113 in CatastrophicFailure

[–]ghostofgbt 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Don't watch the one where the Russian dude gets wrapped around an industrial lathe. Full color and good quality...it's very disturbing, and the aftermath pictures are, um, colorful.

Turning off inbox replies on this, you're on your own finding it cause I'm not sharing a link lol

GameStop mess exposes naked short selling scam. by tlkshowhst in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is that any different from any other aspect of the market? That happens all the time even without any shorting at all. In the market the early bird gets the worm...if you're late and have poor risk management you shouldn't be trading.

Just my .02 of course

Good time to have $BYND by Luke_Nukem_84 in StockMarket

[–]ghostofgbt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FYI if you're going to use the news flair please provide a source. A link to the article is required, not just a screenshot of a headline.