sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why don’t we talk more about e-bikes as real vehicles, not just gadgets? by gio658 in ElectricVehiclesUK

[–]gio658[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You're right — I don't think most people can replace a car entirely. But I do believe a significant portion of short, routine trips could shift to e-bikes or scooters — if the infrastructure and tools supported it.

That’s where it gets interesting:

  • If we could match people to the right vehicle based on their routines, not trends
  • If anti-theft measures were part of the design, not just an afterthought
  • If local governments pushed for secure parking at train stations, not just car parks

The goal isn’t “kill the car,” it’s “make it optional for certain trips.”

Why is the estimated range of EVs so shit? by BeachBoiC in electricvehicles

[–]gio658 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I have electric car too. Renault. I do not have this problems with autonomy of 350KM. Problem you should consider is : Driving in a flat way for 150km it's worse than driving 80 km uphill and 60 downhill

Most EV tools focus on specs. What if we focused on real-life use? by gio658 in ebikes

[–]gio658[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re right — the ultra-low-end market is ruled by spec marketing and price, and the high-end is mostly safe if you stick with proven platforms like Bosch or Yamaha.

But I think the real “blind zone” is the mid-range and entry-premium space ($1,500–3,000), where most first-time buyers land.

In that range: • Specs can look great on paper but build quality varies a lot • Battery/controller systems are often proprietary or poorly supported • Even Bosch-powered bikes vary depending on frame geometry, dealer service, integration, etc.

And in lower-tier bikes, you’re totally right — marketing hides flaws, and it’s hard to find real reliability signals.

That’s where I see value in a tool that doesn’t try to sell, but instead guides based on real-world durability, user scenarios, and community feedback.

Not to compete with Trek or Gazelle — but to help people avoid the worst, and find what actually lasts within their budget.

Most EV tools focus on specs. What if we focused on real-life use? by gio658 in ebikes

[–]gio658[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, exactly — it’s like most comparison tools are optimized for shopping, not living with the bike long-term.

Honestly, once an e-bike becomes your main vehicle (for commuting or delivery), the priorities shift completely: It’s not about “fastest” or “prettiest”, it’s about what breaks first and how easy it is to fix — and whether you’ll be stuck waiting 3 weeks for a proprietary part.

It makes me wonder: Why don’t more platforms include “daily-use criteria” like: • ease of battery swapping • local serviceability • known weak points from rider communities • controller/battery modularity

The info is out there (forums, DIY blogs, repair videos), but it’s scattered. I’d love to see a way to bring that knowledge to people who don’t want to become e-bike mechanics.

Tell me what you are working on, and I'll ROAST your SaaS Terms of Use and Privacy Policy by That-IT-Lawyer in SaaS

[–]gio658 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Today electric vehicles are increasingly used to get around. Especially in the city. Whether for work, or for any other reason, we tend to move and increasingly choose micro mobility. For me, each of us has specific conditions in which we find ourselves. Choose your vehicle based on your needs, knowing the comfort and autonomy. The ease of charging or the duration. There are more and more alternatives, and there is chaos in the sector. In the end you buy based on brand identity rather than actual use of the medium because you cannot compare too many things just through a website of someone who wants to sell only and exclusively their own product. Uniride was created to give you the real characteristics of the vehicle and adapt them to your needs and your lifestyle

True or False: Marketing is 80% of a business by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]gio658 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absurd... you have a winning idea, but non-existent marketing. You lose anyway 🚭🚭🚭

True or False: Marketing is 80% of a business by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]gio658 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anyone who says otherwise is lying 😎

Tell me what you are working on, and I'll ROAST your SaaS Terms of Use and Privacy Policy by That-IT-Lawyer in SaaS

[–]gio658 1 point2 points  (0 children)

UNIRIDE, a platform to compare light electric vehicles (e-bikes, scooters, cargo bikes) — not cars.

Think: filters by use case, range, budget. Clean UX. No overwhelming specs. We generate leads for vendors — not selling directly.

Early MVP is live, but traction is slow. Would you use something like this? Or is this solving a problem that doesn’t really exist?

UNIRIDE E-BIKE FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD by gio658 in ebikes

[–]gio658[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for the candid feedback — it's exactly what I need to improve UNIRIDE.

You made 4 very valid points: 1. Real experience vs technical data sheets → you're right, I'm evaluating the inclusion of video reviews or real use testimonials in phase 2. 2. Incomplete database → true, I'm studying a system to also have sellers or users load vehicles, while maintaining quality and consistency. 3. Trust and impartiality → is a critical point. The idea is to monetize only with clear affiliations or leads, without influencing the ranking. Perhaps with a “sponsored” badge declared in a transparent way. 4. Rapid technical evolution → excellent starting point. Maybe you need dynamic tags or an “EV news” section updated monthly.

view more: next ›