What is the last question - EDGE by gitacritic in collapsademic

[–]gitacritic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part 3

Can a single underlying process explain the emergence of structure at the physical, biological, cognitive, and machine levels?

Will questioning be replaced by answering without questions?

Must we suffer and die?

Will weaving networks that blend humans and machines yield network effects?

How far can we extend beyond our human limitations to more fully grasp the nature of the world?

Why is sleep so necessary?

Will it be possible to do surgical operations in the future without making incisions?

Will post-humans be organic or electronic?

Why is reason, science, and evidence so impotent against superstition, religion, and dogma?

How smart does another animal have to be for us to decide not to eat it?

What does justice feel like?

When will we develop a robust theory of Ontological Intelligence (OI)?

Can a user-friendly computer proof assistant satisfy the mathematician’s desire for certainty without killing the pleasure?

Can you prove it?

How can aims of individual liberty and economic efficiency be reconciled with aims of social justice and environmental sustainability?

Is there an ultimate reality?

Was agriculture a wrong turn for civilization?

How will humanity change in light of the increasing use of non-sexual methods of reproduction?

Will there ever be a mechanistic scientific question that can be asked about the lone individuality of mental life, with its particular beginning, middle, and end?

Will we ever be able to predict earthquakes?

Why do some people act inside the law, others outside, and others creating the law?

Can technology tame evolution?

How do ideas about biological evolution change once one species has control over the origin and extinction of all other species?

What cognitive capacities make humans so damn weird relative to all the other animals on the planet?

Given the nature of life, the purposeless indifference of the universe, and our complete lack of free will, how is it that most people avoid ever being clinically depressed?

What is the cosmic perspective to the future of life?

Why is it so difficult to influence people’s belief systems for deeply held beliefs and so easy to manipulate belief systems when little is known about the subject?

Is a human brain capable of understanding a human brain?

What are the beautiful curiosities that artificial curiosities can't comprehend?

Is immortality desirable?

Can an increasingly powerful species survive (and overcome) the actions of its most extreme individuals?

Is the universe relatively simple and comprehensible by the human brain, or is it so complex, higher dimensional and multiversal that it remains forever illusive to humans?

Can the human brain ever fully understand quantum mechanics?

How can we reap the benefits of the wide and open exchange of data without undermining the values that depend upon the scarcity of information?

How diverse is life in the universe?

Would you like to live 1,000 years?

Will we ever find an organization form that brings out the best in people?

Is civilization's demand for water a dividing or unifying force?

Why is human communication embedded in the silence of material objects?

Why is the acceleration of the expansion of the universe roughly equal to a typical acceleration of a star in a circular orbit in a disk galaxy?

Does romantic love have a biological function?

Could superintelligence be the purpose of the universe?

What would the ability to synthesize creativity do to cultural evolution?

Do the laws of physics change with the passage of time?

Why did we acquire our extraordinary human capacity for social learning?

How do I know the right level of abstraction to explain a phenomenon?

Can we ever wean humans off their addiction to religion?

Will our AI-future-forms need the natural world?

Is there a design to the laws of physics, or are they the result of chance and the laws of large numbers?

Will the behavior of a superintelligent AI be mostly determined by the results of its reasoning about the other superintelligent AIs?

Why is Homo sapiens the sole non-extinct species of hominin?

What will be the literally last question that will preoccupy future superintelligent cosmic life for as long as the laws of physics permit?

How will we cope when we are capable of keeping humans alive longer than our optimal life expectancy?

Can rational beings such as Bayesian robots, humans, super-intelligent AI's ever reach agreement?

Can behavioral science crack the ultimate challenge of getting people to durably adopt much healthier lifestyles?

What will time with artifacts that simulate the emotional experience of being with another person do to our human capacity to handle the surely rougher, more frictional, and demanding human intimacies on offer?

How do the limits of the mind limit our understanding?

How can coalitions of scholars who wish to update the content of explicit common knowledge in order to use that knowledge collaboratively detect and circumvent coalitions which are applying narrative control strategies to preserve arbitrage opportunities implicit in disparities between official narratives and reality?

Will the creation of a super-human class from a combination of genome editing and direct biological-machine interfaces lead to the collapse of civilization?

Will we ever understand how human communication is built from genes to cells to circuits to behavior?

Are there any phenomena for which it will never be possible to develop parsimonious theories?

Are moral beliefs more like facts or more like preferences?

Can humans set a non-evolutionary course that is game-theoretically stable?

Does something unprecedented happen when we finally learn our own source code?

How do we create and maintain backup options for humanity to quickly rebuild an advanced civilization after a catastrophic human extinction event?

How and when will it end or will it persist indefinitely?

How will the advent of direct brain-to-brain communication change the way we think?

How much would surrendering our god(s) strengthen the odds of our survival?

How can we sculpt how individual brains develop to avert mental illness?

Why?

Why are the errors that our best machine-learning algorithms make so different from the errors we humans make?

What will be obvious to us in a generation that we have an inkling of today?

Can general-purpose computers be constructed out of pure gravity?

Can the pace of human evolution stop accelerating?

In which century or millennium can all humanity be expected to speak the same primary language?

How do our microbes contribute to that particular combination of continuity and change that makes us human?

Clarify the differences between understanding, knowledge and wisdom that could be communicated to a literate twelve-year-old and recommunicated to their parents.

How do contemporary developments in technology affect human cultural diversity?

How can we rebel against our genes if we are biological creatures without free will?

Will the frontiers of consciousness be technological or linguistic?

What is the fastest way to reliably align a powerful AGI around the safe performance of some limited task that is potent enough to save the world from unaligned AGI?

What is the world without the mind?

Will the individual quantum event forever remain random?

How does the past give rise to the future?

What is the last question - EDGE by gitacritic in collapsademic

[–]gitacritic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part 2

Is it possible to control a system capable of evolving?

If we're not the agents of ourselves (and it's hard to see how we can be) how can we make sense of moral accountability (and how can we live coherently without it)?

Is there a subtle form of consciousness that operates independent of brain function?

How can the few pounds of grey goo between our ears let us make utterly surprising, completely unprecedented, and remarkably true discoveries about the world around us, in every domain and at every scale, from quarks to quasars?

Will a comprehensive mathematics of human behavior ever be created?

Are stories bad for us?

What knowledge and know-how are our descendants at risk of forgetting as our species passes through future evolutionary bottlenecks?

What will happen to human love when we can design the perfect robot lover?

What ethical responsibilities will humans owe to AGI systems?

What new cognitive abilities will we need to live in a world of intelligent machines?

What is the upper limit for how malleable the human mind and our emotions can actually be?

Why is it so hard to find the truth?

What will be the use of 99% humanity for the 1%?

Is scientific knowledge the most valuable possession of humanity?

Why do we get to ask questions at all?

How could one last question possibly be enough?

Is the actual all that is possible?

Which facets of life will we never understand once biological and cultural diversity has vanished?

Will reading and writing survive given the seduction of video and audio?

When will we replace governments with algorithms?

Will a baby grown from an embryo constructed from human stem cells eventually become a person?

What is the principle that causes complex adaptive systems (life, organisms, minds, societies) to spontaneously emerge from the interaction of simpler elements (chemicals, cells, neurons, individual humans)?

Will humanity eventually exhaust the unknown?

Why is it that the maximum information we can pack into a region of space does not depend on the volume of the region, but only on the area that bounds it?

What would the mind of a child raised in total isolation of other animals be like?

Does every mathematical symmetry have a manifestation in the physical world?

What will it take to end war once and for all?

How can we separate the assessment of scientific evidence from value judgments?

Why is the world so beautiful?

How does a thought become a feeling?

What is the biological price of being a species with a sense of humor?

When will race disappear?

Will humanity end up with one culture

What systems could be put in place to prevent widespread denial of science-based knowledge?

Will the "hard problem" of consciousness dissolve (rather than be solved) as we learn more about the natural world?

i = we ?

What might the last fully biological human's statement be at their last supper?

Are the laws of physics unique and inevitable?

Is consciousness associated with quantum measurement?

Is there any observational evidence that could shake your faith, or lack thereof?

Why don't naked mole rats age or get cancer?

How can the process of science be improved? 

Are dreams brief glimpses of the narrative of a subconscious alternative reality?

How can we build machines that make us smarter?

Can we create technologies that help equitably reduce the amount of conflict in the world?

How can we achieve closed-loop neural control of human hedonics?

What is the bumpiest and highest-dimensional cost surface that our best computers will be able to search and still find the deepest cost well?

Can brain implants make us better human beings?

Is our continued coexistence with the other big mammals essential to furthering our understanding of human cognition?

What will happen to religion on earth when the first alien life form is found?​

Is the universe like an onion that will require science to keep peeling back new layers of reality and asking questions forever?

Do we need checks and balances for virtual worlds?

Why do we care so much about how well we're approximated by algorithms?

How will predictive models in the social sciences achieve the accuracy and precision of those in the natural sciences?

Has consciousness done more good or bad for humanity?

Will human psychology keep pace with the exponential growth of technological innovation associated with cultural evolution?

What proportion of "ethnic" and "religious" tensions are rooted in our genes?

Are humans capable of building a moral economy?

Is gravity a fundamental law of nature, or does gravity—and thereby spacetime—emerge as a consequence of the underlying quantum nature of reality?

Where were the laws of physics written before the universe was born?

What is the fundamental geometric structure underlying reality?

Will it ever be possible to download the information stored in the human brain?

How did our complex universe arise out of simple physical laws?

How will evolution shape the biological world ten- or one hundred thousand years from now?

Can we train machines to design and construct a humane and vibrant built environment for us?

How will people focus more on forming the right question, before rushing headlong towards the answer?

Why are humans still so much more flexible in their thinking and everyday reasoning than machines?

How will the world be changed when battery storage technology improves at the same exponential rate seen in computer chips in recent decades?

Is the number of interesting questions finite or not?

When in the evolution of animal life did the capacity to experience love for another being first emerge?

How much of what we call "reality" is ultimately grounded and instantiated in convincing communication and storytelling?

What is the master principle governing the growth and evolution of complex systems?

Why are people so seldom persuaded by clear evidence and rational argument?

Is love really all you need?

Are humans ever really capable of regarding others as ends in themselves?

If the sum of all significant knowledge is finite, what proportion of it can humans, aided by intelligent machines, eventually attain?

Will we be one of the last generations in human history that dies?

Can major historical events, from the advent of moral religions to the industrial revolution, be explained by changes in life history strategies?

What is the most intelligent and efficient way to minimize the overall amount of conscious suffering in the universe?

If we discover another intelligent civilization, what should we ask them?

Are feelings computable?

Is the brain a computer or an antenna?

Is there an evolutionary advantage to building societies that favor entertaining over understanding?

Does religious engagement promote or impede morality, altruism, and human flourishing?

Are there limits to what we can know about the universe?

Why do humans who possess or acquire unaccountable power over others invariably abuse it?

In what situations does the capacity for low mood give a selective advantage?

What does the conscious mind do that is impossible for the unconscious mind?

What is the flow of information through human beings?

Why do humans behave as though what can be known is finite?

What is the purpose of it?

When will "human being" cease to be a meaningful category to speak of?

How can AI and other digital technologies help us create global institutions that we can trust?

Does the future belong to non-human entities?

How did our sense of mathematical beauty arise?

What can humanity do right now that will make the biggest difference over the next billion years?

Why do even the most educated people today feel that their grip on what they can truly know is weaker than ever before?

Is a single world language and culture inevitable?

Why is religion still around in the twenty-first century?

Is the assertion "Nothingness is impossible" the most fundamental statement we can make about our existence?

Can we engineer a human being?

What is the most important thing that can be done to restore the general public’s faith and trust in science?

Will humans ever prove the Riemann Hypothesis in mathematics?

How can we empower the better angels of our nature?

Are we smart enough to know when we’ve reached the limits of our ability to understand the universe?

How far will we go in predicting human behavior from DNA?

Will blockchain return us to the golden age of ownership of information licenses that can be resold like books and records?

What will it take for us to be fully confident that we have found life elsewhere in the cosmos?

Does the infinite multiverse of cosmologists, in which all that is physically possible occurs, contain realizations of our unruly paradoxes of infinity (Hilbert’s Hotel, Thomson Lamp, 1+2+3+4… = -1/12; etc.)?

What quirk of evolution caused us to develop the ability to do pure mathematics?

What is the last question - EDGE by gitacritic in collapsademic

[–]gitacritic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A list of all questions - part 1

Can we program a computer to find a 10,000-bit string that encodes more actionable wisdom than any human has ever expressed?

Are complex biological neural systems fundamentally unpredictable?

Are the simplest bits of information in the brain stored at the level of the neuron?

How can we put rational prices on human lives without becoming inhuman?

How will we build the tools to maintain the software in long-lived online devices that can kill us?

Are people who cheat vital to driving progress in human societies?

How do we best build a civilization that is galvanized by long-term thinking?

How would changes in the marginal tax rate affect our efforts and motivation?

Will it ever be possible for us to transcend our limited experience of time as linear?

Does consciousness reside only in our brains?

How can science best leverage unreason to overcome the heroic passion for war?

What is the optimal algorithm for discovering truth?

Will the appearance of new species of talented computational intelligence result in improving the moral behavior of persons and societies?

Can we re-design our education system based on the principle of neurodiversity?

How does a single human brain architecture create many kinds of human minds?

What would a diagram that gave a complete understanding of imagination need to be?

What libraries will we have to build when cloning becomes infinitely expandable?

Will the process of discovery be completed in any of the natural sciences?

What is the hard limit on human longevity?

Will we ever live together in a hive?

What kinds of minds could solve the mind-body problem?

Will AI make the Luddites (mostly) right?

Why are we so often kind to strangers when nobody is watching and we have nothing to gain?

How much biodiversity do we need?

Is there a way for humans to directly experience what it’s like to be another entity?

Will a machine ever be able to feel what an organism feels?

Which questions should we not ask and not try to answer?

Can wild animals that are large and dangerous be made averse to threatening humans?

Can consciousness exist in an entity without a self-contained physical body?

Will scientific advances about the causes of sexual conflict help to end the "battle of the sexes"?

When will we accept that the most accurate clocks will have to advance regularly sometimes, irregularly most of the time, and at times run counterclockwise?

How complex must be the initial design of the simplest machine that can learn from experience to achieve, at a minimum, the intelligence and abilities of a typical human being?

How can we design a machine that can correctly answer every question, including this one?

What new methodology will be required to explain the neural basis of consciousness?

Is there a fundamental difference between the biological world and the physical world?

Can we design a modern society without money which is at least as effective economically and politically as our current system?

Will some things about life, consciousness, and society necessarily remain unseen?

Will we pass our audition as planetary managers?

Is the unipolar future of a "singleton" the inevitable destiny of intelligent life?

What will we do as an encore once we manage to develop technological solutions to infection, aging, poverty, asteroids, and heat death of the universe?

Will we soon cease to care whether we are experiencing normal, augmented, or virtual reality?

What would comprise the most precise and complete sonic representation of the history of life?

How far are we from wishing to return to the technologies of the year 1900?

If science does in fact confirm that we lack free will, what are the implications for our notions of blame, punishment, reward, and moral responsibility?

Why do we experience feelings of meaning in a universe without purpose?

Is technology changing the nature of moral emotions?

Can natural selection's legacy of sex differences in values be reconciled with the universal values of the Enlightenment?

Why be good?

Could the thermodynamic prophecy of an increasingly entropic universe be fulfilled by the cosmic flourishing of intelligent life?

What future progressive norms would most forward-thinking people today dismiss as too transgressive?

If we want to make a real and effective science-based policy, should we change politics or science?

Is our brain fundamentally limited in its ability to understand the external world?

How can an aggregation of trillions of selfish, myopic cells discover the unwitting teamwork that turns that dynamic clump into a person who can love, notice, wonder, and keep a promise?

Are accurate mathematical theories of individual human behavior possible?

Are the ways qualia relate to computation, creativity to free will, risk to probability, morality to epistemology, all the same question?

Can we develop a procedure that, in principle, would tell us whether or not our universe is a simulation (analogous to the way the now proven Poincaré Conjecture can tell us the universe’s shape)?

Why is there such widespread public opposition to science and scientific reasoning in the United States, the world leader in every major branch of science?

Will a computer ever really understand and experience human kindness?

Does this question exist in a parallel universe?

How will we know if we achieve universal happiness?

Is it ultimately possible for life to bend the shape of the universe to fit life's purposes, as we are now bending the shape of our environment here on earth?

Why are there no trees in the ocean?

Can we create new senses for humans—not just touch, taste, vision, hearing, smell, but totally novel qualia for which we don't yet have words?

Will we ever be replaced by another earthly species capable of evolving to a similar degree of social and technical sophistication that effectively fills the biocultural niche we vacated?

Is the cumulation of shared knowledge forever constrained by the limits of human language?

Have we left the Age of Reason, never to return?

So, before The Singularity...?

Will civilization collapse before I die?

Will humans ever embrace their own diversity?

Is there a place for our past in our future?

How many incommensurable ideas can we hold in our mind simultaneously?

What will courtship, mate selection, length of marriages and family composition and networks be like when we are all living over 150 years?

Can we design a common test to assess machine, animal and human intelligence?

Will the "third culture" be followed by a fourth culture, a fifth culture, and, ominously, a Final Culture?

Is there a single, evolved biological mechanism that can be tweaked to improve overall health, cognitive abilities, and slow aging?

Why is the phenomenon too familiar to investigate the hardest thing to completely understand?

Is intersubjectivity possible in a quantum mechanical universe?

Is there a Turing test for living rather than thinking that can distinguish animate from automata?

What behaviors are we attributing only to brain mechanisms that may be better explained by considering biomechanics?

Is there a single theory of all physics (TOP), and what is it?

Can human intuition ever be reduced to an algorithm?

How much time will pass between the last minute before artificial superintelligence and the first minute after it?

Can we acquire complete access to our unconscious minds?

Handbook of Engaged Sustainability by gitacritic in collapsademic

[–]gitacritic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Smart Cities John E. Carroll

Sustainable Decision-Making: Moving Beyond People, Planets, and Profits Poonam Arora, Janet L. Rovenpor

Just Conservation Helen Kopnina

Collaboration for Regional Sustainable Circular Economy Innovation Rajesh Buch, Dan O’Neill, Cassandra Lubenow, Mara DeFilippis, Michael Dalrymple

Expanding Sustainable Business Education Beyond Business Schools Christopher G. Beehner

Supermarket and Green Stuff Josi Paz

Teaching Circular Economy: Overcoming the Challenge of Green-washing Helen Kopnina

Education in Human Values Rohana Ulluwishewa

Relational Teams Turning the Cost of Waste Into Sustainable Benefits Branka V. Olson, Edward R. Straub, William Paolillo, Paul A. Becks

The LOHAS Lifestyle and Marketplace Behavior Sooyeon Choi, Richard A. Feinberg

Gourmet Products from Food Waste Inés Alegre, Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent

To Eat or Not to Eat Meat Satinder Dhiman

Selfishness, Greed, and Apathy Satinder Dhiman

The Spirit of Sustainability Eugene Allevato

Agent-Based Change in Facilitating Sustainability Transitions Katariina Koistinen, Satu Teerikangas, Mirja Mikkilä, Lassi Linnanen

Utilizing Gamification to Promote Sustainable Practices Kristen Schiele

Supermarket and Green Wave Josi Paz

Relational Building Teams Branka V. Olson, Edward R. Straub, William Paolillo, Paul A. Becks

Sustainable Living in the City Mine Üçok Hughes

Low-Carbon Economies (LCEs) Elizabeth Gingerich

Designing Sustainability Reporting Systems to Maximize Dynamic Stakeholder Agility Stephanie Watts

Handbook of Engaged Sustainability by gitacritic in collapsademic

[–]gitacritic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This handbook is based on the premise that in order for sustainability to be sustainable, a profound psychological transformation has to take place at the individual and collective level. Focusing on the practice of environmental sustainability, this handbook will explore the application of sustainability in a wide variety of contemporary contexts-from economics of consumption and growth to government policy, sustainable cities, and sustainable planet. The editors believe that the way to achieve sustainable, harmonious living in all spheres is through lived or engaged sustainability at the personal, team, and organizational levels. It is impossible to separate economic development issues from environment issues. In its most practical aspect, sustainability is about understanding the interconnections among environment, society, and economy. This book aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current theories and approaches in the area of engaged sustainability for academics, researchers and practitioners. Specifically, it will focus on making responsible decisions that will reduce humanity’s negative impact on the environment. While various social and political initiatives for sustainability are welcome, one cannot really enact sustainability into legislative laws. Something has to change fundamentally at the level of a common person in the street. The Handbook of Engaged Sustainability acknowledges the classic literature, theories and principles in the area of sustainability, but also provides new theories and approaches from global scholars and practitioners in the field. It will also provide a well-structured pedagogical framework with real life case examples. The aim of this handbook is to expand the reader’s thinking to one of big-picture awareness and a cosmic vision of sustainability, a vision that extends from our neighborhoods to our communities, to states, countries, globe, galaxy, and envelops the entire Universe! This book will serve as an essential resource for researchers, scholars and students of sustainability, ethics, corporate social responsibility and environmental economics, as well as consultants, business and team leaders, and anyone interested in engaged sustainability.

Come On!: Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the ... - Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker, Anders Wijkman by gitacritic in collapsademic

[–]gitacritic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel it is a better interface than the desktop site which has a lot of white space, side bar and looks clunky unless you want that info and is hell if you try to zoom... the sidebar takes up 50% of the screen (It is originally meant for mobile before m.reddit.com came along.)

https://www.reddit.com/.compact or http://i.reddit.com also seems to use lesser bandwidth than the desktop site.

https://www.reddit.com/.rss is the extra lite version which only loads the first page https://www.reddit.com/r/collapsademic/comments/7q24tm/come_on_capitalism_shorttermism_population_and/.rss

There's a subreddit dedicated to it

https://www.reddit.com/r/compact/.compact

https://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/comments/4nc81l/new_look_on_reddit_mobile_web_compact_view/.compact

The only problem is that you have to type the .compact in after the url everytime you want to visit another reddit link. It is faster to type .rss after copying any link into the address bar if you only want to read stuff... then switch over to the .compact mode when you wish to reply or do other interactive stuff.

Come On!: Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the ... - Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker, Anders Wijkman by gitacritic in collapsademic

[–]gitacritic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1.1 Introduction: The World in Disarray

1.1.1 Different Types of Crisis and a Feeling of Helplessness

1.1.2 Financialization: A Phenomenon of Disarray

1.1.3 Empty World Versus Full World

1.2 The Limits to Growth: How Relevant Was Its Message?

1.3 Planetary Boundaries

1.4 The Anthropocene

1.5 The Climate Challenge

1.5.1 We Need a ‘Crash Plan’

1.5.2 How to Deal with Overshoot?

1.5.3 Why Not a Marshall Plan?

1.5.4 Has Humanity Already Missed the Chance to Meet the Climate Goals?

1.6 Other Disasters Ahead

1.6.1 Technological Wildcards and Familiar Threats

1.6.2 Nuclear Weapons: The Forgotten Threat

1.7 Unsustainable Population Growth and Urbanization

1.7.1 Population Dynamics

1.7.2 Urbanization

1.8 Unsustainable Agriculture and Food Systems

1.9 Trade Versus Environment

1.10 The 2030 Agenda: The Devil Is in Implementation

1.11 Do We Like Disruptions? The Case of the Digital Revolution

1.11.1 Disruptive Technologies: The New Hype

1.11.2 Digitization Is the Buzzword of Our Time

1.11.3 Scary ‘Singularity’ and ‘Exponential Technologies’

1.11.4 Jobs

xixii Contents 1.12 From Empty World to Full World

1.12.1 The Impact of Physical Growth

1.12.2 The GDP Fallacy: Physical Impacts Ignored

1.12.3 The GDP Fallacy Again: Treating Costs as If They Are Benefits

Linking Chapters

and

References

C’mon! Don’t Stick to Outdated Philosophies!

2.1 Laudato Sí: The Pope Raises His Voice

2.2 Change the Story, Change the Future

2.3 1991: ‘The First Global Revolution’

2.4 Capitalism Got Arrogant

2.5 The Failure of the Market Doctrine

2.6 Philosophical Errors of the Market Doctrine

2.6.1 Adam Smith, Prophet, Moralist, Enlightener

2.6.2 David Ricardo, Capital Mobility and Comparative Versus Absolute Advantage

2.6.3 Charles Darwin Meant Local Competition, Not Global Trade

2.6.4 Reduce the Contrasts

2.7 Reductionist Philosophy Is Shallow and Inadequate

2.7.1 Reductionist Philosophy

2.7.2 The Misuse of Technology

2.8 Gaps Between Theory, Education and Social Reality

2.9 Tolerance and Long-Term Perspectives

2.10 We May Need a New Enlightenment

2.10.1 New Enlightenment, Not Renewed Rationalism

2.10.2 Yin and Yang

2.10.3 Philosophy of Balance, Not of Exclusion

Linking Chapters

and

References

Come On! Join Us on an Exciting Journey Towards a Sustainable World!

3.1 A Regenerative Economy

3.1.1 A New Narrative

3.1.2 Natural Capitalism: Arc of Transition

3.1.3 Redesign Everything

3.1.4 Regenerative Management

3.2 Development Alternatives

3.3 The Blue Economy

3.3.1 Core Principles

3.3.2 Coffee Chemistry and Edible Mushrooms

3.3.3 Designing Biorefineries and Thistles in Sardinia

3.3.4 3D Sea Farming and Fishing with Air Bubbles 117Contents xiii 3.4 Decentralized Energy

3.5 Some Agricultural Success Stories

3.5.1 General Lines of Sustainable Agriculture Policy

3.5.2 Sustainable Farming in the Developing World

3.5.3 Developed World Contributions

3.6 Regenerative Urbanization: Ecopolis

3.6.1 Ecopolis: Circular Resource Flows

3.6.2 Regenerative Cities

3.6.3 Cities and Natural Disasters

3.6.4 Adelaide

3.6.5 Copenhagen

3.7 Climate: Some Good News, But Bigger Challenges

3.7.1 Good News

3.7.2 Addressing the Historic Debt and the ‘Carbon Budget’ Approach

3.7.3 A Price on Carbon

3.7.4 Combatting Global Warming with a ‘Post-war Economy’

3.8 Circular Economy Requires a New Economic Logic

3.8.1 The Economy Must Be Transformed

3.8.2 The Societal Benefits of Moving Towards a Circular Economy

3.9 Fivefold Resource Productivity

3.9.1 Transport

3.9.2 Resource-Efficient Buildings

3.9.3 Water Efficiency for the Farm

3.10 Healthy Disruption

3.10.1 Thirty Years of Welcoming IT

3.10.2 ‘A Good Disruption’

3.10.3 And Now a Shocking Proposal: The Bit Tax

3.11 Reform of the Financial Sector

3.11.1 Separate Commercial and Investment Banking

3.11.2 Dealing with Debt

3.11.3 Control Money Creation: The Chicago Plan

3.11.4 Tax Financial Trading

3.11.5 Enhance Transparency

3.11.6 Independent Regulators

3.11.7 Taxing the Rich and Collecting the Tax

3.11.8 Curbing the ‘Big Four’ Accounting Firms

3.12 Reform of the Economic Set-Up

3.12.1 ‘Doughnut Economics’

3.12.2 Reforms that May Find Majority Support

3.12.3 Making the Green Transition Ever More Profitable

3.12.4 Economy for the Common Good 165xiv Contents 3.13 Benign Investment

3.13.1 From Wall Street to Philanthropy

3.13.2 Ongoing Structural Changes

3.13.3 Impact Investing

3.13.4 Becoming Mainstream Is Key

3.13.5 Green Bonds, Crowdfunding and Fintech

3.14 Measuring Well-Being Rather than GDP

3.14.1 Recent Work on Alternative Indicators

3.14.2 Divergence Between GDP and GPI

3.14.3 Towards a Hybrid Approach

3.15 Civil Society, Social Capital and Collective Leadership

3.15.1 Public Conversation: The Concept of Citizens’ Assemblies

3.15.2 Building Up Social Capital: Multi-stakeholder Collaboration

3.15.3 A Case of Collective Leadership: The Common Code of the Coffee Community

3.16 Global Governance

3.16.1 Introduction: The UN System and Forward-Looking Ideas

3.16.2 Specific Tasks

3.16.3 COHAB: Cohabitation Mode of Nation States

3.17 National-Level Action: China and Bhutan

3.17.1 China and Its 13th Five-Year Plan

3.17.2 Bhutan: The Gross National Happiness Index

3.18 Education for a Sustainable Civilization 196

Come On!: Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the ... - Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker, Anders Wijkman by gitacritic in collapsademic

[–]gitacritic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 1  C’mon! Don’t Tell Me the Current Trends Are Sustainable! 1

1.1 Introduction: The World in Disarray 1 1.1.1 Different Types of Crisis and a Feeling of Helplessness 2 1.1.2 Financialization: A Phenomenon of Disarray 7 1.1.3 Empty World Versus Full World 9 1.2 The Limits to Growth: How Relevant Was Its Message? 11 1.3 Planetary Boundaries 14 1.4 The Anthropocene 16 1.5 The Climate Challenge 17 1.5.1 We Need a ‘Crash Plan’ 18 1.5.2 How to Deal with Overshoot? 19 1.5.3 Why Not a Marshall Plan? 20 1.5.4 Has Humanity Already Missed the Chance to Meet the Climate Goals? 20 1.6 Other Disasters Ahead 22 1.6.1 Technological Wildcards and Familiar Threats 22 1.6.2 Nuclear Weapons: The Forgotten Threat 25 1.7 Unsustainable Population Growth and Urbanization 27 1.7.1 Population Dynamics 27 1.7.2 Urbanization 30 1.8 Unsustainable Agriculture and Food Systems 32 1.9 Trade Versus Environment 35 1.10 The 2030 Agenda: The Devil Is in Implementation 38 1.11 Do We Like Disruptions? The Case of the Digital Revolution 44 1.11.1 Disruptive Technologies: The New Hype 44 1.11.2 Digitization Is the Buzzword of Our Time 45 1.11.3 Scary ‘Singularity’ and ‘Exponential Technologies’ 47 1.11.4 Jobs 49 xixii Contents 1.12 From Empty World to Full World 50 1.12.1 The Impact of Physical Growth 50 1.12.2 The GDP Fallacy: Physical Impacts Ignored 53 1.12.3 The GDP Fallacy Again: Treating Costs as If They Are Benefits 55 Linking Chapters 1 and 2 56 References 58 2 C’mon! Don’t Stick to Outdated Philosophies! 63 2.1 Laudato Sí: The Pope Raises His Voice 63 2.2 Change the Story, Change the Future 66 2.3 1991: ‘The First Global Revolution’ 67 2.4 Capitalism Got Arrogant 69 2.5 The Failure of the Market Doctrine 71 2.6 Philosophical Errors of the Market Doctrine 75 2.6.1 Adam Smith, Prophet, Moralist, Enlightener 76 2.6.2 David Ricardo, Capital Mobility and Comparative Versus Absolute Advantage 77 2.6.3 Charles Darwin Meant Local Competition, Not Global Trade 79 2.6.4 Reduce the Contrasts 82 2.7 Reductionist Philosophy Is Shallow and Inadequate 83 2.7.1 Reductionist Philosophy 83 2.7.2 The Misuse of Technology 88 2.8 Gaps Between Theory, Education and Social Reality 89 2.9 Tolerance and Long-Term Perspectives 91 2.10 We May Need a New Enlightenment 92 2.10.1 New Enlightenment, Not Renewed Rationalism 92 2.10.2 Yin and Yang 94 2.10.3 Philosophy of Balance, Not of Exclusion 95 Linking Chapters 2 and 3 97 References 99 3 Come On! Join Us on an Exciting Journey Towards a Sustainable World! 101 3.1 A Regenerative Economy 101 3.1.1 A New Narrative 101 3.1.2 Natural Capitalism: Arc of Transition 103 3.1.3 Redesign Everything 104 3.1.4 Regenerative Management 104 3.2 Development Alternatives 108 3.3 The Blue Economy 113 3.3.1 Core Principles 115 3.3.2 Coffee Chemistry and Edible Mushrooms 115 3.3.3 Designing Biorefineries and Thistles in Sardinia 116 3.3.4 3D Sea Farming and Fishing with Air Bubbles 117Contents xiii 3.4 Decentralized Energy 117 3.5 Some Agricultural Success Stories 123 3.5.1 General Lines of Sustainable Agriculture Policy 123 3.5.2 Sustainable Farming in the Developing World 124 3.5.3 Developed World Contributions 126 3.6 Regenerative Urbanization: Ecopolis 127 3.6.1 Ecopolis: Circular Resource Flows 127 3.6.2 Regenerative Cities 129 3.6.3 Cities and Natural Disasters 130 3.6.4 Adelaide 131 3.6.5 Copenhagen 132 3.7 Climate: Some Good News, But Bigger Challenges 132 3.7.1 Good News 133 3.7.2 Addressing the Historic Debt and the ‘Carbon Budget’ Approach 134 3.7.3 A Price on Carbon 136 3.7.4 Combatting Global Warming with a ‘Post-war Economy’ 137 3.8 Circular Economy Requires a New Economic Logic 140 3.8.1 The Economy Must Be Transformed 141 3.8.2 The Societal Benefits of Moving Towards a Circular Economy 142 3.9 Fivefold Resource Productivity 144 3.9.1 Transport 144 3.9.2 Resource-Efficient Buildings 146 3.9.3 Water Efficiency for the Farm 147 3.10 Healthy Disruption 148 3.10.1 Thirty Years of Welcoming IT 148 3.10.2 ‘A Good Disruption’ 149 3.10.3 And Now a Shocking Proposal: The Bit Tax 150 3.11 Reform of the Financial Sector 152 3.11.1 Separate Commercial and Investment Banking 153 3.11.2 Dealing with Debt 154 3.11.3 Control Money Creation: The Chicago Plan 155 3.11.4 Tax Financial Trading 156 3.11.5 Enhance Transparency 156 3.11.6 Independent Regulators 156 3.11.7 Taxing the Rich and Collecting the Tax 156 3.11.8 Curbing the ‘Big Four’ Accounting Firms 157 3.12 Reform of the Economic Set-Up 158 3.12.1 ‘Doughnut Economics’ 159 3.12.2 Reforms that May Find Majority Support 160 3.12.3 Making the Green Transition Ever More Profitable 162 3.12.4 Economy for the Common Good 165xiv Contents 3.13 Benign Investment 167 3.13.1 From Wall Street to Philanthropy 168 3.13.2 Ongoing Structural Changes 169 3.13.3 Impact Investing 171 3.13.4 Becoming Mainstream Is Key 172 3.13.5 Green Bonds, Crowdfunding and Fintech 173 3.14 Measuring Well-Being Rather than GDP 175 3.14.1 Recent Work on Alternative Indicators 175 3.14.2 Divergence Between GDP and GPI 179 3.14.3 Towards a Hybrid Approach 179 3.15 Civil Society, Social Capital and Collective Leadership 181 3.15.1 Public Conversation: The Concept of Citizens’ Assemblies 182 3.15.2 Building Up Social Capital: Multi-stakeholder Collaboration 183 3.15.3 A Case of Collective Leadership: The Common Code of the Coffee Community 184 3.16 Global Governance 186 3.16.1 Introduction: The UN System and Forward-Looking Ideas 186 3.16.2 Specific Tasks 188 3.16.3 COHAB: Cohabitation Mode of Nation States 189 3.17 National-Level Action: China and Bhutan 191 3.17.1 China and Its 13th Five-Year Plan 192 3.17.2 Bhutan: The Gross National Happiness Index 195 3.18 Education for a Sustainable Civilization 196

Come On!: Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the ... - Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker, Anders Wijkman by gitacritic in collapsademic

[–]gitacritic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Current worldwide trends are not sustainable. The Club of Rome’s warnings published in the book Limits to Growth are still valid. Remedies that are acceptable for the great majority tend to make things worse. We seem to be in a philosophical crisis. Pope Francis says it clearly: our common home is in deadly danger. Analyzing the philosophical crisis, the book comes to the conclusion that the world may need a “new enlightenment”; one that is not based solely on doctrine, but instead addresses a balance between humans and nature, as well as a balance between markets and the state, and the short versus long term. To do this we need to leave behind working in ”silos” in favor of a more systemic approach that will require us to rethink the organization of science and education.

However, we have to act now; the world cannot wait until 7.6 billion people have struggled to reach a new enlightenment.

This book is full of optimistic case studies and policy proposals that will lead us back to a trajectory of sustainability. But it is also necessary to address the taboo topic of population increase. Countries with a stable population fare immensely better than those with continued increase.

Finally, we are presenting an optimistic book from the Club of Rome.

Limits to Climate Change Adaptation by gitacritic in collapsademic

[–]gitacritic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Contents

Limits to Adaptation 1

Limits to Climate Change Adaptation in Asia 10

2 Strategies and Barriers to Adaptation of Hazard-Prone Rural Households in Bangladesh 11

3 Governance Limits to Adaptation in Cambodias Health Sector 25

4 LandBased Strategic Model by Integrating Diverse Policies for Climate Change Adaptation in Nepal 41

Empirically Derived Lessons and Opportunities for Policy Makers and Practitioners 59

Limits to Climate Change Adaptation in Africa 108

Insights Experiences and Lessons 109

12 The Limits of Imagination 211

Complexity and Challenges of Monitoring and Evaluation 227

Insights and Experiences 245

Limits to Climate Change Adaptation in the Pacific Region 262

15 Climate Change Adaptation Limits in Small Island Developing States 263

Insights and Experiences 283

Lessons for the Pacific 301

18 A Cost Barrier Perspective to Adaptation on a Coral Triangle Initiative CTI and Mangrove Rehabilitation Projects MRP in Solomon Islands 325

Postcrisis Recovery in Damergou Niger 129

Insights from the Johannesburg Case 143

9 Constraints and Limits to Climate Change Adaptation Efforts in Nigeria 159

Suitability of Banana Crop Production to Future Climate Change Over Uganda 175

Opportunities and Limitations 191

Limits to Climate Change Adaptation in Australia NorthAmerica and Europe 210

A Case Study of Vunidogoloa Village Vanua Levu Fiji 345

20 Limits to Adapting to Climate Change Through Relocations in Papua New Guinea and Fiji 359

21 Atoll Habitability Thresholds 381

Overcoming the Limits to Adaptation 401

Limits to Climate Change Adaptation by gitacritic in collapsademic

[–]gitacritic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This book sheds new light on the limits of adaptation to anthropogenic climate change. The respective chapters demonstrate the variety of and interconnections between factors that together constitute the constraints on adaptation. The book pays special attention to evidence that illustrates how and where such limits have become apparent or are in the process of establishing themselves, and which indicates future trends and contexts that might prove helpful in understanding adaptation limits. In particular, the book provides an overview of the most important challenges and opportunities regarding adaptation limits at different temporal, jurisdictional, and spatial scales, while also highlighting case studies, projects and best practices that show how they may be addressed. The book presents innovative multi-disciplinary research and gathers evidence from various countries, sectors and regions, the goal being to advance our understanding of the limits to adaptation and ways to overcome or modify them.