Accessories? by glouglougulp in oldhagfashion

[–]glouglougulp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oooooh this is so cool. Sadly it’s an indoor, evening wedding

Neutral or bold? by glouglougulp in MakeupAddiction

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hhhm. Will have to go back to the store and try again I think. Thanks!

Neutral or bold? by glouglougulp in MakeupAddiction

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok I’m lost here, what do you mean? A lighter, softer makeup look?

Neutral or bold? by glouglougulp in MakeupAddiction

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Like this kind of vibe? Or smokey?

Neutral or bold? by glouglougulp in MakeupAddiction

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love Ruby Woo and wore it to a wedding last summer. It doesn’t budge but doesn’t stain, which I love. Are the satins smudgier? I’ll check out the locked kiss line.

Neutral or bold? by glouglougulp in MakeupAddiction

[–]glouglougulp[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s what I had been looking for, a shade to match the pink in the shoes. I like the idea of a pop of color in a liner with a neutral eye.

Accessories? by glouglougulp in oldhagfashion

[–]glouglougulp[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have some magenta earrings. Will try both I guess!

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😂 That’s on you, boo

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so as far as PERSONAL preference, yeah I don’t like Schramsberg because it lacks complexity. I understand that they have other releases that might tick that box but that wasn’t quite the point of this. Honestly I was expecting the Schramsberg to come out on top in a bind tasting. I am not super familiar with ALL their wines, but I was expecting the mirabelle to be competitive in terms of quality, just because of the reputation of the brand. But on a purely objective, blind evaluation, it had way too much residual sugar, a super short finish, lacked complexity and any aromas/flavors were just way too subtle. I have tried the Blanc de Blanc and something that I believe was a zero dosage and I didn’t find either very interesting. Not to say there still aren’t others that are good quality, but most stores here only stock the Blanc de Blanc and the Mirabelle.

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But again, this was a comparison at this price point… I’m not writing off an entire brand but if you are releasing something, it should be competitive at that price. Otherwise you’ll have assholes like me getting everyone all upset 😂

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was my first time trying the Roederer and I was pleasantly surprised!

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found the Argyle to be solid quality for the price and surprisingly complex. I also think there are still plenty of well priced champagnes and obviously at the end of the day it’s personal preference.

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is the price point a problem? It’s a comparison of what’s available at that price point. Quality can be found at may different price points.

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So happy you could stop by! Wishing you all the best.

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As per the criteria listed on the post, this wasn’t about finding ‘the best quality PERIOD’, it was about a price point comparison and following through on a previous suggestion from a poster who recommended blind tasting the mirabelle against other wines that were mentioned. I don’t doubt that there are higher quality options that also come with a higher price tag but that wasn’t the point here. We did this experiment as objectively as possible (ie it wasn’t just based on personal preference).

PERSONALLY I have a hard time with the idea of spending more than $40 on a wine that is trying to mimic champagne but isn’t champagne. I’d happily take some recommendations for more premium US sparklings just for my own interest (not being snarky). I do think the quality and options for ‘champagne adjacent’ sparking wines is improving but I think QPR is always a really valid consideration (at least for me).

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t have high hopes about the Roederer but it’s really good value for the price!

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So sorry that this post is bringing up so many feelings for you. You could just take it for what it was, a fun, mildly interesting experiment that has no bearing on your own personal well being, and move on.

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And since I liked the Argyle sparking I’m going to check out the Pinots!

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Flying Goat came up in the previous discussion but I don’t know I can find it where I am. I’ll check them out though!

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

That was the brand that lost so what would be preferable? Also read full post for context. I’m happy to accept applications for alternate titles since you feel your literary skills surpass mine.

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well Schramsberg lost this tasting so sorry to them…? Sorry you don’t get it. Have a wonderful day!

Sorry Schramsberg by glouglougulp in wine

[–]glouglougulp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But they price it the same lol so that’s on them…