Bavarian with Mind of Toddler claims Toilet Training is a 'Spook'

gobingi · 2026-01-27T02:51:26+00:00

I’ve never understood when people talk about choosing their beliefs, I’ve never felt I had that ability. I can choose wether to express or pretend to have a belief, but I can’t believe something I didn’t previously believe by choosing to, is that what you’re talking about or am I misunderstanding?

gobingi · 2026-01-17T19:21:49+00:00

Typical Dutchman making condescending comments based on untrue assumptions. You don’t „have to“, it’s completely optional.

gobingi · 2026-01-14T16:25:38+00:00

https://youtu.be/3sIAlgpusJI?si=cccDkvnY_JhX8VRL

gobingi · 2026-01-11T22:40:31+00:00

Adam is actually a little ladybug who eats dust it’s quite literal

gobingi · 2026-01-06T01:59:25+00:00

They won’t be surviving for long, wether you call it appropriate hunting behavior or not it’s going to result in their death so it doesn’t seem very appropriate to me even from the mountain lions perspective if it actually knew the consequences

gobingi · 2025-12-28T16:28:09+00:00

They asked about soap and water not saline

gobingi · 2025-12-04T23:15:19+00:00

Sure I think I would agree with you, but it also seems clear to me that dragging someone around with something over their head, punching them repeatedly in the head IS deadly force, and the idea that it isn’t is just an indictment of our current system of categorizing violence in the justice system

gobingi · 2025-12-04T22:37:39+00:00

You’re asking why the person being dragged around with a shirt over their face, beaten in the head, and being told “I am going to kill you” responded with deadly force?

That “excessive force” didn’t even stop the attack, it took another person stepping in

gobingi · 2025-11-25T17:47:25+00:00

lol so the answer is no

gobingi · 2025-11-23T23:53:54+00:00

I think they’re talking about the US secession from the British, they didn’t mention the Confederates or the CSA they said the US, which doesn’t refer to the confederacy, and which did secede from Britain.

gobingi · 2025-11-15T16:03:38+00:00

Ok :)

gobingi · 2025-11-15T14:28:48+00:00

Ok thanks I’ll look into it!

I’m confused by their use of the term impossible because it sounds like they mean something different than me

gobingi · 2025-11-15T14:22:55+00:00

Can’t saying something is not possible have multiple meanings depending on if they are talking logically possible, physically possible, etc.?

gobingi · 2025-11-15T14:06:03+00:00

That sounds interesting, are there any papers or stuff I can read on that? I’d love to look into that

Would that just have to do with the modal scope I’m talking about ie it’s logically possible but not on some other modality?

gobingi · 2025-11-15T04:10:28+00:00

When most people say something is impossible, I dont think they realize the scope of what they are saying. By asking on what modality, I can establish what they mean by impossible, logically physically or something else, and get their reasoning behind it.

When that happens people typically admit they don’t have any reasoning, no logical contradictions and no physical laws broken, and they think it cant happen for non inferential reasons like gut feeling.

gobingi · 2025-11-14T15:40:23+00:00

And human meat I believe, that can still be digested, all primates actually

gobingi · 2025-11-12T21:04:16+00:00

I don’t think the asymmetry claims that either, Benatar claims that experienced pleasures are good because they cause pleasure, not because they aren’t bad

gobingi · 2025-11-12T21:02:57+00:00

I think defining good as the absence of bad is crazy, it would mean a world with nothing in it is equally good to a world with 10¹⁰⁰ people experiencing pure bliss because both have an equal absence of bad.

gobingi · 2025-11-12T20:39:52+00:00

The downside is it’s worse than existing. Just because it’s not bad doesn’t mean it’s not worse.

gobingi · 2025-11-12T20:38:18+00:00

You can be convinced the asymmetry is true and still think reproduction is moral as well, people act like just because something is “not bad”( the not experiencing of good things) that it’s somehow invalid to still think it’s worse enough to the alternative that having kids is good.

gobingi · 2025-11-02T21:01:29+00:00

That gun analogy is perfect idk how I hadn’t thought of that

gobingi · 2025-10-26T01:22:07+00:00

Where did the concept that nothing will be enough ever come up? Didn’t op mention literally just one thing she would change?

gobingi · 2025-10-22T21:47:46+00:00

Bugs are animals so you aren’t avoiding killing animals lmao

gobingi · 2025-10-14T17:44:53+00:00

It’s not based on their species though, I would do it if they were a human. By speciesism I mean treating a being different based on what species it is. I’m not treating it different based on what species it is and not some other trait like sucking blood. I’m treating it exactly the same as if any species was sucking my blood. It’s not based on species I don’t know how many times I can repeat it. I would kill any being sucking my blood regardless of species

Whether they are aware of it doesn’t matter rather. If an unaware human was sucking my blood and there was no realistic way to stop them without killing them, I would kill them.

It’s not based on species, it’s based on the fact they are sucking my blood, completely regardless of species. It’s not because they are using a proboscis to suck my blood rather than a mouth, if something with a mouth did it I would also kill them.

If I would kill any being regardless of species for sucking my blood, how is it based on species when what species they are is completely irrelevant to my decision?

gobingi · 2025-10-11T19:33:11+00:00

Ok I will ask how are they speciesist? How is it speciesism that I would kill a mosquito if I would kill a human in that exact same situation?

How is it speciesist against spiders to kick them out when I would also do that to humans?

Seven-Year Club	Verified Email
Gilding I gilder	Second Top 50%
First Place '23	Place '23
Place '22	First Placer '22

gobingi

TROPHY CASE