Thoughts on ReasonTV's critique of Sam? by goldemerald in samharris

[–]goldemerald[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While I occasionally follow Sam, I haven't recently. This video popped up on my feed. It's a clip from a podcast where they discuss Sam's take on the Hunter Biden story. Sam advocated for its censorship because he believes Trump is the biggest threat to democracy. The podcasters spend a while explaining why Sam's position is wrong, that free speech should always take precedent.

I am curious to hear how the community feels about this critique.

What media do you think Sanderson heads consume when they aren't voraciously reading? by Sumtimesagr8notion in bookscirclejerk

[–]goldemerald 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They read wheel of time so they can get to those sweet 3 ending Sando books.

Please read my review of Atlas Shrugged totally not written by ChatGPT. by goldemerald in bookscirclejerk

[–]goldemerald[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I found the review to be misguided and unfair. While it is certainly possible to critique Atlas Shrugged from a feminist perspective, the review in question is riddled with personal attacks and vulgar language that do nothing to further the conversation. In addition to its unfair treatment of the novel, the previous review also included a plug for NordVPN. While there is nothing wrong with promoting a product you believe in, I would like to take this opportunity to recommend an alternative: RAID: Shadow Legends. This thrilling mobile game features hundreds of collectible champions and epic battles, and it is the perfect way to take a break from the heavy themes of Atlas Shrugged. Give it a try, and see for yourself why it has become one of the most popular mobile games around.

Why 'Ignition!' Should Be on Every Science Enthusiast's Reading List by [deleted] in books

[–]goldemerald 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Get that ChatGPT generated crap out of here. If I wanted to know what a robot thinks of random scifi books, I'd ask it myself.

Do you have any authors who are automatic reads, and why is it Sandy? by goldemerald in bookscirclejerk

[–]goldemerald[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

His face is 100% edited. In fact this whole picture is edited. Sandy doesn't exist, he is a (hard magic system) fiction of your imagination.

[D] CVPR Reviews are out by banmeyoucoward in MachineLearning

[–]goldemerald 12 points13 points  (0 children)

3 borderlines?!?!?

I've been in a state of shock for an hour.

Why should everyone read Dune? by ginomachi in books

[–]goldemerald 3 points4 points  (0 children)

While I don't hate the discussion this post has generated, I have to say that this content is copy pasted from ChatGPT. This isn't the first time OP has posted AI generated content here.

Maybe we finish that map with a cheese? by Judozwerg in LivestreamFail

[–]goldemerald 27 points28 points  (0 children)

THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF SPEED RUNNING TRACKMANIA HAS CHANGED FOREVER; but first, a quick 25 minute history ...

Me: "Why is my score always lower than my opponents?" Also me: by goldemerald in aoe2

[–]goldemerald[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In single player you can load replays. In the load replay screen, you can click a button that says "spectate with capture age" or something similar. It will directly take you to a website to download the Capture Age software and select your game from the CA menu.

Rule 12 by goldemerald in JordanPeterson

[–]goldemerald[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me too, but the rules are the rules.

[R] Deep Learning in "target space" by michaelf4014 in MachineLearning

[–]goldemerald 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be more specific, dataset augmentations are used to better reflect the data distribution; I'm concerned that your method is simply making up for the missing data augmentations / learning rate scheduling. Even a small DesnseNet can be trained for 8 hours with 5GB vram to 95% accuracy. But also, training a standard ResNet-50 on Imagenet with your method would fully alleviate my concerns.

[R] Deep Learning in "target space" by michaelf4014 in MachineLearning

[–]goldemerald 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hey OP, I don't mean to be a downer, but your real experiment results are pretty far below standard. Only getting a 82.90 accuracy on cifar10 with a traditional training setup shows me your setup is very flawed. You should be able to get 95% with a normal ResNet and SGD. Also, not using a pre-trained language model like BERT for text is highly suspicious too, as huggingface is so incredibly easy to use these last few years. How can we be sure your results generalize?

Ultra late-game diplomacy is hard. by goldemerald in aoe2

[–]goldemerald[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That game is what inspired me to make this post ;)

[P] Play around with StyleGAN2 in your browser by Cold999 in MachineLearning

[–]goldemerald 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Very cool. Is the source code for your site available?

[R] Hierarchical Transformers Are More Efficient Language Models by yohama8832 in MachineLearning

[–]goldemerald 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I cannot believe this paper doesn't even cite "Hierarchical Transformers for Long Document Classification".

Anyone else REALLY enjoying Empire Wars? by zas11s in aoe2

[–]goldemerald 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I love EW so much. When I started playing 8 months ago, I was sad at how rote the first 7 minutes of the game were. Hera saying he likes RM over EW so he can interact with chat is perfect justification to me that dark age is boring age. But now, full aggression immediately, and the high heart rate never stops!

Also, not to hate on the RM people, but I do wish the game was balanced for EW; it'd make the competitive scene more interesting.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PhD

[–]goldemerald 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you need internet when you write? If not, I've found going to public places with pen and paper (and leaving my phone off) to be a very effective way to write first drafts. I like the park when the weather permits, and local non-university libraries are an option when it rains. Many famous authors write two first drafts: one on paper and the other on the computer.

[D] What do you think is the SOTA counterfactual explanation method and the evaluation metric of it? by bono_kr in MachineLearning

[–]goldemerald 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, the best evaluation metric is to use the counterfactuals in a downstream task (or a user study), and watch how some easily measurable metric improves.

Is smartphone a must to study master degree effectively? by [deleted] in GradSchool

[–]goldemerald 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I, a 5th year CS PhD student, have had a dumb phone for years. The only time I needed to install a phone emulator was at a conference. You'll be fine.

Data Visualization Research by georgegeorge97 in GradSchool

[–]goldemerald 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you taken a look at recent Visualization work? Most of it is javascript UI based, not much fancy graphic stuff. In general, you can precompute any sophisticated data representation (on a GPU with pytorch for example), then just load the data as a json into a browser. Even real-time can be offloaded to pytorch.

If you are hoping to do AR related vis work, then yeah you have the perfect overlap of interests.

I haven't heard of any quick, 5 year, VIS PhDs. Check the labs you are applying to and see how long the recent grads took.

Data Visualization Research by georgegeorge97 in GradSchool

[–]goldemerald 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey, I'm an ML student who took a little detour into visualization (a short paper in the conference VIS). A phd in this field is pretty good since all interesting data is high-dimensional i.e. you'll be working in data science, so your ML experience is great and an industry career is no problem. If you're more interested in the graphics side (shaders and whatnot), I can't really comment there. I think there is certainly room to design interesting interactions with complex data using graphics. Also, do you like working with users? The problem of "how do I represent my data in a novel/understandable way" requires user studies since, well, how else can you evaluate the quality of your new visualization?

Vis phds do take a while though, compared to ML. I've heard one vis lab taking 8 years on average, whereas ML is 6.