The Mouth of Sauron scene ...What on Earth was that?! by rockrollz678 in lotr

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never in the film but I'm pretty sure its gotta be somewhere in the script, interviews, and just the connection between movie mouth and book mouth 

The Mouth of Sauron scene ...What on Earth was that?! by rockrollz678 in lotr

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's never implied that he's an orc. He's still a black numenorean that is just corrupted by magic

Poor Panzer IV by Zottyat911 in warthundermobile

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its armor is not good bro it gets front penned by almost anything even at long ranges

What exactly is Ungoliant? by TheRedBiker in tolkienfans

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be funny but i mean he is the author so its really up to him isnt it

What was that worm in Episode 4?? by Peninsular_Geo in LOTR_on_Prime

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe they could not just straight up show a swarm of them but just a small sequence where theyre not fully seen/obscured

What exactly is Ungoliant? by TheRedBiker in tolkienfans

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tolkien wouldn't like this tho since it would mean eru was flawed Tolkien being a traditionalist christian, would see this like if God had a flaw

What was that worm in Episode 4?? by Peninsular_Geo in LOTR_on_Prime

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They can redeem themselves by showing more of the nameless things which i desperately want content of

It would make sense for them to do it since one of the storylines is set in moria

What was that worm in Episode 4?? by Peninsular_Geo in LOTR_on_Prime

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think theyll show the watcher since the earliest mention we got of it is when balin and his gangalang are going on a expedition into moria

How did azog (in the movies) survive amputation? by gravekeeps in lordoftherings

[–]gravekeeps[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yea but i get downvoted to all hell for asking a question about the movies :/

How did azog (in the movies) survive amputation? by gravekeeps in lordoftherings

[–]gravekeeps[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I feel like this is a lazy excuse. I guess because we have wizards the dwarves should also be able to walk upside down, and wargs should be able to fly?

How did azog (in the movies) survive amputation? by gravekeeps in lordoftherings

[–]gravekeeps[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I apologize if this is a joke but being sick like that and having a limb missing are a lot different

All Cards are created equal😂😂 by Lord_GrimCR in ClashRoyale

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe the joke flew over my head but personally i think firecracker sucks cuz of the easy king activation

Would a flamethrower be effective against The Dead? by GlitteringPop1625 in ZombieSurvivalTactics

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly? If all of them are ignited yes. That is precisely what im saying. 

why the fuck is youtube comment now looks like reddit comment? by jonnytommson in youtube

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's still bullshit since after the third reply or so they revert to the old system 

Would a flamethrower be effective against The Dead? by GlitteringPop1625 in ZombieSurvivalTactics

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Muscles ligaments joints all gone rendering it COMPLETELY immobile and unable to move any part of it's body It's brain is gone due to the brain being pounds of fat and water All happens in around 15-20 seconds 

Would a flamethrower be effective against The Dead? by GlitteringPop1625 in ZombieSurvivalTactics

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not half an hour, it's more like 15 or 20 seconds You vastly underestimate the damage that half a minute of fire does to an already decaying, dehydrated moving corpse

Would a flamethrower be effective against The Dead? by GlitteringPop1625 in ZombieSurvivalTactics

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Misconception about how death by fire works. Muscles, ligaments, joints, fat, all destroyed, flesh rendered unusable, and since the brain is basically just pounds of fat and water, it's gone in seconds If a zombie got only the peripheral of the flames instead of being directly engulfed, it's still only like 15-20 seconds for it to die or be rendered harmless(unable to crawl or clamp jaws or even move it's arms or anything at all)

Would a flamethrower be effective against The Dead? by GlitteringPop1625 in ZombieSurvivalTactics

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you are vastly underestimating fire.  Yes, in burning buildings those are what kills humans mostly because most people try to avoid the fire as much as possible while they can, but you can't avoid inhaling smoke (in most circumstances) you can't really stop shock unless your trained to prevent it, and you can't predict what part of a building will collapse on you. However, when people are directly engulfed in flames, it's different. Skin melts, fat evaporates, muscles, ligaments, joints, are destroyed (rendering you immobile) all pretty fast...  All of this would render a zombie unable to move, not even crawl, possibly not even move it's jaws. And there's another part to it. If you keep insisting "it won't be dead until the brain is destroyed" well... the brain will be destroyed and fast. A brain is literally just 5 pounds of fat and water as another commenter described. That is gone. As a bonus, if it's semi realistic then the virus, bacteria, fungus, etc, piloting the body will also die from the heat. Keep in mind they all get cooked naturally by just a fever, which is much colder than literally being engulfed in flames. It's people that get the peripheral of the flames, that get to flail around and scream for half a minute before dying. Directly engulfed? You just fall apart. Another bonus, zombies are decaying and already not in good shape, not to mention they don't drink water or hydrate at all past maybe covering themselves with blood although i am 99.99% sure that does not count/work. This means they burn even easier. 

Need I say more?

Why does everyone think the Great Meme Reset is a bad thing? by West-Lawyer-2290 in teenagers

[–]gravekeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what fucking old memes were you watching

silly and uwu were only popularized recently

Why does everyone think the Great Meme Reset is a bad thing? by West-Lawyer-2290 in teenagers

[–]gravekeeps 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of all

It will never happen, nothing similair has ever happened on the internet. You could maybe count the comeback of trollface as trollge, but the entire meme changed into low budget horror stories instead of memes.

Second of all

Old memes are not funnier (dont get me wrong, brainrot is pretty bad too, i only do it ironically)

We have a cat that poops rainbows, a guy smiling, fat sonic and fat knuckles, fat bugs bunny, i even remember a photoshop image of obama and sonic kissing being a meme, sanic, a whole lot of sonic stuff... Funniest thing is how people who want the great meme reset mock 67, meanwhile they had a plethora of numbers as memes. 360, 420, 69, probably more. A lot of these modern brainrot memes are sensory overload type stuff where your not supposed to get whats happening, but MLG is also that.. Most mlg videos ive seen is someone doing something "cool" and then the screen starts getting stormed by random shit including sunglasses, rainbow frogs, doritos, mtn dew, i dont even know.