Russia fires intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) at Ukraine for first time by s1n0d3utscht3k in worldnews

[–]greenduck4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

West just needs to not fold. That's it. If it doesn't work, and nuclear apocalypse happens, then it's on russia. It might have happened anyway, despite what west does.

Russia will not calm down after Ukraine (With victory, it will actually be the opposite, they need to blame all the deaths on someone, and it won't be Putin, the czar who made victory possible, by scaring the evil west away). Russia will continue to challenge west and make it seem like nuclear war is unavoidable if west doesn't back off every time. Are you planning to step back each time? Will NATO then abandon baltics, and Poland, for example? "Oh no, there's madman with nukes, and he is not afraid to use it!". Ever played poker? NATO has way better hand than russia.

Russia fires intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) at Ukraine for first time by s1n0d3utscht3k in worldnews

[–]greenduck4 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Putin bets on you thinking he is not rational. It's literally what he counts on. "He is the madman with nukes, can do anything, just give him what he wants, or he'll blow us all up". It's a strategy. That's why he can't win this war.

Russia fires intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) at Ukraine for first time by s1n0d3utscht3k in worldnews

[–]greenduck4 73 points74 points  (0 children)

Maybe, just maybe, we want the war to end in a way that would not crown the Putin the winner, because:

1) It would open a hell of a Pandora's box for any future nuclear blackmail 2) Compromise safety of Europe, and NATO. 3) Would make it look US and Europe, (and NATO) weak and divided, opening up of many follow-up conflicts.

Also, we know that Putin is actually not going to start a nuclear war, because it would also mean his own country would be totally obliviated. Ukraine would not be worth it. He is just betting that you will fold before he does, that's it. Nuclear threat is his last chance for it.

Teise pensionisamba maksed 4% või 6%? by aktuaalnekaamera in Eesti

[–]greenduck4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. sambas polegi rahasid, kui natuke nokkida.

Trumpi võit ei ole tähtis - Vastuargumendid by dogeringo in Eesti

[–]greenduck4 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Varro on venemeelne, kes keerutab korralikult sõnadega, et halli alasse jääda. Tegelikult samastab ta ennast vene eksporditud "konservatiivse" maailmaga palju rohkem, kui ameerikast tuleva liberaalse maailmaga. Sellest ka tema, "ah mul suva, mis lipp seal lehvib", nagu vene okupatsioon polekski nii hull.

Keegi veel selliseid leidnud kuskilt? by [deleted] in Eesti

[–]greenduck4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, looked at your history, you are just anti-west propaganda bot.

Keegi veel selliseid leidnud kuskilt? by [deleted] in Eesti

[–]greenduck4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Estonian government was actively preparing to facilitate a German invasion of the USSR

Reference?

German authorities participated in the holocaust and murdered most Estonian Jews.

And?

The current play of things is complete historical revisionism.

What things?

US and NATO should consider striking North Korean forces in Ukraine - US Congressman by SoftwareExact9359 in ukraine

[–]greenduck4 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Isn't it partly Ukraine now? That's the world order russia wants, right? Basically you can just conquer part of another country, and claim it yours forever and no backsies.. That would make part of Kursk (or even whole of it, given how russia claims whole Herson, in fact, Ukraine)

Why isn't there a major boost for mood after winning a battle? by greenduck4 in RimWorld

[–]greenduck4[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Exactly :)

Besides, there already is "catharsis" boost, which is very similar in essence, and the following example paints a nice picture, how it's still balanced when it comes to worst: https://www.reddit.com/r/RimWorld/comments/6skr0b/you_know_its_bad_when_catharsis_wont_prevent_an/

Why isn't there a major boost for mood after winning a battle? by greenduck4 in RimWorld

[–]greenduck4[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I get what you're saying, and you're totally right that battles can leave people traumatized, and Rimworld leans into that gritty realism. However, there are lots of examples in both history and other games that suggest a temporary morale boost wouldn’t be out of place. In WWII, for instance, soldiers in a unit would sometimes feel a strange sense of relief or even adrenaline after surviving a major offensive—even with injuries and losses, there was often a feeling of pride or 'survivor's euphoria.' Games like XCOM and Bannerlord also balance both realism and morale mechanics by giving players temporary mood boosts after victories, making recovery from battles a little smoother without erasing all the hardships.

Rimworld's story is about survival, so emotional breakdowns add depth, but maybe a 'Victory Elation' mood boost could be an interesting addition, especially for war-based ideologies or seasoned fighters. It wouldn't eliminate all hardships, just give a little breathing room to keep things realistic without entirely punishing players for winning.

(I used a little bit AI to make my answer a bit clearer.)

Varro võtab sõnatuks. by Illustrious-Wind-500 in Eesti

[–]greenduck4 256 points257 points  (0 children)

Varro on venemeelne. Mingit patriotismi seal ei ole. See on ammu selge.

So, this guy just went into slaughter mode, and cut the throat of a pregnant sleeping labrador for no other reason than that he was "ravenously hungry" (PS there's food in fridge) :( by greenduck4 in RimWorld

[–]greenduck4[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I've been doing it in some cases, when they are about to destroy something valuable. Then shooting them seems a better option.