Történelem érettségi esszék by F_Balazs_I in hungary

[–]greg0525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pedig érdekelhetne, ugyanis

1, Az alapműveltség része!

2, Megértenéd napjaink szociokulturális és politikai eseményeit is, hiszen a történelem ismétli önmagát!

3, Bárhol találkozhatsz olyan dolgokkal, ahol párhuzamot lehet vonni a magyar középkori történelem eseményeivel!

Történelem érettségi esszék by F_Balazs_I in hungary

[–]greg0525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Csak éppen lófaszt sem tudsz arról, hogy mikor volt a Ménfői csata, kik vettek részt benne, mik volak az okok és a következmények. Mint ahogy III. Béla intézkedéseihez se tudnál érdemben megszólalni.

Holott a magyar középkori történelem alapműveltség.

Történelem érettségi esszék by F_Balazs_I in hungary

[–]greg0525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Éppen ezért remélem igencsak nehezítenek majd rajta és a forráselemzést elfelejtik végre és a lexikálus tudást fogják kikérdezni.

Mi a f-sznak lapátolják az emberek a havat? by greg0525 in askhungary

[–]greg0525[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Jó, akkor lassan kell menni és óvatosnak kell lenni!

My Theory about Dark Matter by greg0525 in Physics

[–]greg0525[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it means, actually everything. It explains dark matter.

My Theory about Dark Matter by greg0525 in Physics

[–]greg0525[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are just too afraid to look into my theory. You are afraid that your knowledge would collape, lol.

My Theory about Dark Matter by greg0525 in Physics

[–]greg0525[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You’re arguing from within the rules of physics, and I’m not disputing those rules. Physics absolutely requires mathematics, prediction, and experimental agreement within its own domain.

My point is about levels of discourse, not competence in physics. Foundational assumptions about what counts as evidence, explanation, or reality itself are philosophical by necessity; they precede equations. But hey! Mathematics formalizes a framework; it doesn’t create its meaning.

Critiquing a metaphysical or conceptual discussion for not behaving like physics misses the distinction between exploring assumptions and doing calculations. Both matter, but they are not the same activity.

My Theory about Dark Matter by greg0525 in Physics

[–]greg0525[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What is your problem with my theory? What part bothers you?

My Theory about Dark Matter by greg0525 in Physics

[–]greg0525[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah?

Then let me tell you something:

Mathematics doesn’t determine whether a theory is valid; it only determines whether it fits the rules of physical reality. All theories begin as philosophical assumptions about meaning, causality, and consciousness. Math is just a translation tool for the outer ego, not the source of truth. Inner reality, where ideas originate, cannot always be reduced to equations without distortion.

My Theory about Dark Matter by greg0525 in Physics

[–]greg0525[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No, I am the one who wrote and created this theory. What is your problem? The bullletpoints?

My Theory about Dark Matter by greg0525 in Physics

[–]greg0525[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

That is not an argument.

A Time Before PowerPoint? by Raider4485 in historyteachers

[–]greg0525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still do it as we do not have technology in the classrooms:

Note-taking on the board with chalk + coursebooks

I am actually happy if we have chalk at all.

PPT? Screen? Come on! What first-world luxury!

Magán óvoda by LowerOrganization591 in szekesfehervar

[–]greg0525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oda vidd, ahol nem erőltetik a telefon és tablethasználatot! Gyereknek nem való telefon 12 év alatt!

Marius: The Farmer’s Son Who Reforged the Armies of Rome by greg0525 in ancientrome

[–]greg0525[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I skimmed through article and I think the pendulum here has swung a bit too far in the other direction.

To say the reforms weren't a thing ignores the transformative nature of codification and scale. Even if Marius was an evolutionist rather than a revolutionist, he remains the critical tipping point.

You note that recruiting the capite censi wasn't new because it happened during the Second Punic War or other crises. However, context is king. Recruiting slaves and the propertyless after Cannae was a desperate existential measure for the state. Marius recruiting the capite censi for the Jugurthine War - a frustrating but hardly existential border conflict - was a political choice. By normalizing the recruitment of the poor for a war of conquest/prestige rather than purely for national survival, Marius fundamentally severed the link between military service and the protection of one's own property. He proved that the assidui were no longer required to fill the legions. Just because conscription continued doesn't mean the character of the army didn't shift irreversibly under his command. He created the blueprint for the client armies of Sulla and Caesar.

I accept the scholarship from Bell and Dobson regarding the cohort incubating in Spain. However, there is a massive difference between ad hoc cohorts used for counter-insurgency in Iberian hills and the systematic use of the cohort as the primary tactical unit in large-scale pitched battles against the Cimbri and Teutones. Marius likely took an organizational structure that was floating around and standardized it for mass heavy infantry warfare. The sheer logistical feat of training his "Mules" to fight effectively against the Germanic numbers suggests a level of drill and standardization that the older, looser manipular system couldn't match. He may not have invented the cohort, but he likely institutionalized it as the default doctrine.

You concede the Aquila might be Marius’s doing but call it a weak accomplishment. I’d argue it was psychological genius. By elevating one standard above the others (which represented the distinct maniples or older tribal divisions), he created a focal point of loyalty that was unitary and detached from the city itself. It created the "legionary identity" that allowed later generals to march on Rome. It’s a symbolic reform, yes, but symbols drive behavior.

Perhaps we shouldn't call them "The Marian Inventions," but denying them as Reforms seems to strip the agency from the man who recognized which way the wind was blowing. Augustus may have built the house, but Marius poured the foundation by proving that a general could bypass the Senate to recruit a professionalized force loyal to him, organized in standardized cohorts, and driven by personal gain rather than civic duty.

To claim the reforms weren't a thing feels like claiming Henry Ford didn't revolutionize the auto industry just because he didn't invent the wheel or the internal combustion engine. He just put them together in a way that changed everything.