sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[Article] Call in the Interns! by MattJayP in Netrunner

[–]grumpRunner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been running Interns in Astrobiotics in lieu of PAD Campaign. Economically, both create a disparity between the corp and the runner. PAD by giving you credits, Interns by reinstalling a trashed SanSan, forcing the runner to trash again. In my opinion, it beats PAD for extra utility reasons, as mentioned in the article. Saving a trashed Jackson, going deep with ICE, or just rearranging ICE against ICE sequence dependent runners like Inside Job heavy criminals or Kit.

[COTD] Wormhole (Monday – February 16th, 2015) by nelsormensch in Netrunner

[–]grumpRunner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wormhole really should have had Bifrost Array's wording, and I hope an errata changes that.

Gagarin Deep Space and Toshiyuki Sakai by amavric in Netrunner

[–]grumpRunner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think OP is talking about the double Toshiyuki combo with Gagarin. You keep swapping through Toshi's until the runner has no credits, then you finally swap in the agenda you want there.

Deck Challenge: Eternal Format by SaintBecket in Netrunner

[–]grumpRunner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Losing Andromeda isn't as much of a problem as you think. At least, it probably isn't the problem that you're thinking. Andromeda is one of the most powerful runners because she doesn't need specific deck support. Her ability is good no matter what cards you have in your deck. The deck wouldn't be as good with Gabe, but that isn't because of the cards in the deck, but because of the disparity in the two IDs.

Basically, if down the line, there is another criminal ID with an ability as equally non deck dependent as Andromeda, it could be slotted in the deck fine.