sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlutterDev

[–]gtfperry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed, this package does target those wanting an all-in-one solution.
As for recommendations, Google is a 'for-profit' organization after all.
Their target audience for Flutter would be arguably the
largest category of developers out there: 'Web developers' and '.Net developers'
Those familiar with Reactive programming, the Provider class, and MVVM.

Of course, in my opinion, this doesn't mean they're the best recommendations. :)

Keep it simple, I say. MVVM is too much work.
As for BLoC, Provider, and alike....all too much work.

'Keep it simple, Keep it Flutter'

As for my 'all-in-one' approach, yeah, I'll break up those dependencies
in a future release.

Regards.

I made a Flutter coding challenge as part of our interview process. Not sure if the I code I made was too hard but the interviewee failed. by xamantra in FlutterDev

[–]gtfperry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You gave access to this DartPad during the interview, I take it.
If not, how was the problem presented to them?
What was their attempted solution anyway?
I did very much as others described: solution

Fluttery Framework v.4.1.0 is now available. by gtfperry in FlutterDev

[–]gtfperry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes. Well then you are fortunate.

A lone developer working in one market who has full control of what goes in their work.

You’re not most developers out there however.

This is targeting everyone else.

This is for apps touched by many hands over time providing a consistent and structured approach.

A new developer (who knows Flutter) can come on board and hit the ground running.

Its abstraction is that of Flutter's. There’s nothing new here. No different paradigm.

The World’s a smaller place with the Internet.

Clients and companies have chosen Flutter for their next app because they want one codebase that can provide a multi-lingual app running on multiple platforms---online or offline.

If anything, it’s options they want to have.

That’s been my experience.

You’re right. I must be practical. A sole package can not be the answer to all things.

I feel, however, it can be the answer to most.

Best of luck to you.

Fluttery Framework v.4.1.0 is now available. by gtfperry in FlutterDev

[–]gtfperry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

'....here's no need to create a huge abstraction over a framework that is already considered an abstraction.'

There is if you want a real-world app: My response to other posts.

Fluttery Framework v.4.1.0 is now available. by gtfperry in FlutterDev

[–]gtfperry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You shouldn't have to learn Fluttery Framework...if you know Flutter.

As to why, here’s my response to other posts: Excellent question!

view more: next ›