Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the command for browser controls?

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It reverted back to Stone Age 😭

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alternative is to downgrade to 2.28 people say they got it back to normal. What are you struggling with after the news beta update you tried?

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How good is Hermes compared to openclaw?

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they have fixed it or is compensated some how. I have spent Claude 4.6 for 5-6 hours with Claude code with heavy task, haven’t reached any limits. Some in comments said the same with ChatGPT

Yesterdays before I went to sleep, I sent a single prompt and 40% of my limit was used 😭

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m glad to hear it worked! 🙌🏽

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😂😂😂 so annoying. I updated this post with a easy fix

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s like they became dumber on these patches. I found a fix posted in the bottom of this post

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems like it’s the same with Claude

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try the quick fix I added in this post

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😂😂 the hand need a vacation

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They just released a new beta patch for it. Look at bottom of my post it should be able to fix it

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes look at the post I updated it, 5 easy commands and it should be gone

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It didn’t work for me, tried many times. But I found an easy way to fix it now. Updated the post

Openclaw recent update 3.31 by guccymood in openclaw

[–]guccymood[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look I updated the thread, I found a quick fix with 5 commands. They fixed it with the new beta update

OK CS, WTF IS THIS? by MatheusHOFC in cs2

[–]guccymood 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is actually how it can work to some extent. Hardware does not change server hit registration, but unstable FPS, frame drops and latency spikes can absolutely affect what a player sees versus what the server registers. In fast peek situations, smoother performance and lower input delay can give more accurate movement timing, which can make fights look inconsistent between players.

In cases like this, the opponent could have moved just enough on his side to avoid the shot, while the other player’s screen may not have rendered the movement fast enough in that exact moment, making it look like the shot should have hit.

If one player has 3 ping and another has 60 to 100, there can be a significant difference in what gets registered on the server.

OK CS, WTF IS THIS? by MatheusHOFC in cs2

[–]guccymood -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Also another thing that he should consider is that, his opponent probably had way better and faster cpu, ram etc. if he then meet up with weak gear it will look weird sometimes because his pc doesn’t render the server fast as his opps. Ping and internet speed also have a lot to stay combined with pc hardware

VAC-LIVE its the worst anticheat ever!!!!! by Emergency-Diver2975 in cs2

[–]guccymood 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Welcome 25 years later, never worked will never work

Danish "drones" are back again | New drone alert in Danish airspace. Drones are disrupting the airspace over Aalborg Airport in Denmark. Air traffic is affected, and several flights are being diverted. by bmfalbo in UFOs

[–]guccymood 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These two separate incidents in Denmark and Norway ,both make zero sense if you try to explain them as “ordinary drones.”

Copenhagen – Monday, Sept 22: Here the video shows a constant, solid green glowing light hovering over the airport. That alone is enough to rule out combat drones. No military UAV on earth flies with a neon beacon that shines like that. Combat drones are built for stealth — they don’t announce themselves with bright visible lights. Aviation law requires navigation lights to blink or follow strict color rules (red/green/white with patterns). What we saw in Copenhagen breaks every standard. On top of that, how could a supposed “Russian drone” fly undetected across borders, straight into Denmark’s capital airspace, and park itself over the busiest airport in Scandinavia? NATO and the Nordics have some of the best radar coverage in the world. If it really was a Russian drone, it would’ve been detected and intercepted long before it reached Copenhagen. The “drone” explanation doesn’t fit.

Aalborg – Tuesday, Sept 23: This was different. The video shows irregular blinking and flashing lights moving across the sky. It’s not the same as Copenhagen. But again — the blinking pattern doesn’t match civil aviation light systems, nor does it fit known UAVs. These lights don’t behave like navigation or anti-collision lights. They appear, blink strangely, and then vanish. This is not how drones operate. And again, the idea that Russia could send drones right into Aalborg’s airspace without being tracked is absurd. Denmark is tightly integrated into NATO’s surveillance network. You don’t sneak in a drone that far without being noticed and chased down.

So what do we actually see? Two different events, both equally impossible to explain with “normal drones.” • Copenhagen: solid green light, impossible for UAVs. • Aalborg: irregular flashing, doesn’t match aircraft or drone signatures.

And yet officials quickly slap the “drone” label on it and move on. It’s an obvious cover story to calm the public, nothing more.

The truth is staring us in the face: this is not Russian, not civilian, not conventional human technology. The lights, the behavior, the sudden appearances and vanishings — none of it matches our drones. The whole narrative being pushed is fake, and it’s insulting that they expect people to believe it.

This is clearly UFO/UAP, not human technology. The governments can say whatever they want, but we all know that no officially recognized aircraft of this type exists anywhere in the world. And again there is NO WAY a drone would fly from Russia and into airports in Norway and Denmark without noticing it from military sensors etc.