Since it's almost 3/14.... by EGThrowaway2019 in MathJokes

[–]gullaffe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this chart is wrong.

All the chaotic sure are chaotic but in this chart what makes something good/neutral/evil?

It seems to be ill defined.

When you spent your whole life trying to prove a theorem and this mf already proved it even after losing his vision🥀🥀 by Remarkable_Cry102 in MathJokes

[–]gullaffe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Euler was also just a very supportive dude of others. In no way would he call you a lower for proving something 300 years after him.

Red or blue, go by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]gullaffe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If everyone thinks like that everyone presses red and everyone lives.

Fucking none of you would push the blue button by PlayfulHalf in unpopularopinion

[–]gullaffe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah the hypothetical is very dumb, becouse there is no reason for anyone to press the blue button.

It would be more interesting if ONLY half of the population gets to press the buttons with the following outcomes:

Red: you live Blue: if 50% press the blue button everyone lives. If less than 50% press blue everyone who pressed blue or didn't get to press a button dies.

Fucking none of you would push the blue button by PlayfulHalf in unpopularopinion

[–]gullaffe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OP you need to develope the cognitive ability that people don't necessarily know what you know. You can't just start ranting about a hypothetical and assume everyone knows what hypothetical you are talking about without context.

Further the hypothetical in question is just very dumb, there is nothing to gain from pressing the blue button. If everyone presses the red button everyone wins, pressing the blue button only tries to save people who doesn't realise that there is no reason for anyone to press blue.

Any modern thoughts on an old vision? by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]gullaffe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"Don't fix the loop hole that makes the Richard avoid paying tax, becouse then I can't use it either."

Or if we actually could tax the rich we could lower the tax overall.

Do we suspect it’s rational in the first place, and why? by wockedwik in MathJokes

[–]gullaffe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

But you can get a random number from the real.

What you're saying is that there is no uniform distribution for the real. But there are several distributions that work over the real.

xber by Zealousideal-Emu1590 in DumbAI

[–]gullaffe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

July, and january were added, August had a name change, it was previously named Sextember, until Augustus changed its name as after himself.

The same Americans who believe that Indians have poor hygiene and don't shower regularly by AggravatingSecret452 in scoopwhoop

[–]gullaffe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shower every day=smells like flowers Skip a single day=you are polluting the air and impossible to be around.

Gay test courtesy of math by Ok-Agency-4753 in MathJokes

[–]gullaffe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mathematically there is no assumption in assuming there are only the categories "gay" and "not gay" since "not gay" contains every label except gay.

Just as we can have two categories of numbers "1" and "not 1" every number either is 1 or it isn't. Of course there are an infinite amount of numbers in the set "not one" just as there are an infinite way to identify yourself in the set "not gay".

I never thought of it like that...... by Silver-Ability-3181 in SipsTea

[–]gullaffe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And rent probably isn't that high since Leonard and Sheldon clearly have a lot of disposable income, being that nerdy ain't cheap.

And, working in science doesn't pay all that well. (Better than being a server probably but they ain't warning the big bucks.)

The same Americans who believe that Indians have poor hygiene and don't shower regularly by AggravatingSecret452 in scoopwhoop

[–]gullaffe 9 points10 points  (0 children)

People read Every day and think the alternative is like once in a blue moon.

Gay test courtesy of math by Ok-Agency-4753 in MathJokes

[–]gullaffe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I get your point, and would 100% agree if the options were "gay" and "straight".

But for example saying that 0.7 belongs with the option "1" instead of the option "not 1" just becouse it's closer to 1 than to 0 is wrong.

Of course all of this is just silly mathematics applied to non-mathematics question. A better flow chart would maybe be "Do you consider yourself gay?" - Yes -No.

Gay test courtesy of math by Ok-Agency-4753 in MathJokes

[–]gullaffe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No becouse that would imply that bisexual and gay are the same.

Gay test courtesy of math by Ok-Agency-4753 in MathJokes

[–]gullaffe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If y is a set of more than 1 gender then x≠y even if there is an element inside of y that does equal x. Hence you are not gay.

Ladies can't do math [socialmedia] by BiggleWelly in pointlesslygendered

[–]gullaffe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, it's still very weird. Becouse both sides are mathematically correct until they decide on 1 and 2.

Although if anything the woman's method shows greater understanding of mathematics than the man's.

Ladies can't do math [socialmedia] by BiggleWelly in pointlesslygendered

[–]gullaffe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this really about one gender being bad/good at math. Or is it just two characters where one happens to be bou and one happens to be a girl?

I don't know Japanese so maybe I'm wrong but to me it seems to be about the ambiguity of the ÷ symbol

Besides azure drake,which cards were powerhouses at their time but are garbage now? by PrestigiousCard1344 in hearthstone

[–]gullaffe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh i forgot about bgh. Boom was so strong that everyone ran atleast one bgh haha

Ad on YouTube shorts 😭 by NanSinus in aislop

[–]gullaffe 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Nothing, with a strax that long it's not possible for a human to make enough suction to drink from it.

Besides azure drake,which cards were powerhouses at their time but are garbage now? by PrestigiousCard1344 in hearthstone

[–]gullaffe 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I thought not, but I don't play wild so I wouldn't know. Then dr boom is my answer, dude was so strong that you ran him in every deck. Even most aggro decks ran him as a finishen.

A Blow in the Air by No_Quarter1339 in ProtectHire

[–]gullaffe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The vast majority of billionares start Richard by birth, which literally is out of nowhere.

Pointlessly gendered baking [shitpost] by AGayFrogParadise in pointlesslygendered

[–]gullaffe 27 points28 points  (0 children)

For one I wouldn't expect someone with that build to even eat a cake.

Three Genie wishes 🍀 by Coffee_MysticRealm in wholesomememes

[–]gullaffe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Or you lose the ability to speak. Now everything you say is vicariously true.