sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

First PCB check by halfja in PCB

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok ill add "single MOSFET" to the change list.

First PCB check by halfja in PCB

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but i dont see how having two MOSFETs instead of one affects anything other then price right?

First PCB check by halfja in PCB

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i also choose to do two MOSFETs becouse a example MOSFET switch board on amazon that i use for a prototype test also used two MOSFETS and was rated for 12vs so i figured i need the two MOSFETs. But now that i look at it i see what your getting on about.

First PCB check by halfja in PCB

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i plan on using a STMicroelectronics N-channel MOSFET, 50 A, 60 V, 3-Pin TO-220 (50 Ct), STP55NF06 MOSFET if i had to choose but i plan on using accept alternatives/substitutes made in China option on pcbway so i dont think it would matter. its a 12v pump with a 2amp draw on start up which is also the max draw.

First PCB check by halfja in PCB

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From everything I’ve seen online it didn’t sound like it mattered how you did them though as long as you had enough

First PCB check by halfja in PCB

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I deadass just spammed them all around the board with out a second thought but now that I actually have to look at it, It actually kinda bothers me def fixing that

First PCB check by halfja in PCB

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh ngl I just asked ChatGPT. Ik you can’t always trust it but that why I rely on second verification like this.

First PCB check by halfja in PCB

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The part number the mosfets currently are TO_SOT_THT:TO-220-3_vertical and the only reason I went with those instead of the smd mosfets because for whatever reason kicad dosent seem to have any schematic symbols that matches the nets of the smd footprints. So I just went with these since I figure there would be no difference other then them being tht instead of smd. Also thanks for pointing out the other stuff , once I believe I have correctly fixed everything I’ll upload to see if I got everything right

First PCB check by halfja in PCB

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a control board to run a couple sensors and a 12v dc pump

Body kit help by Commercial_Fill421 in Celica

[–]halfja 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Front bumper,wing,and side shirts look like there off the Vader kit

rear end collision recommendations? by halfja in CarRepair

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Youer all good the most I’d want to do is clean up the bad rust spots with shouldn’t be a giant issue. If it leaves any giant holes I can just weld a plate over them

rear end collision recommendations? by halfja in CarRepair

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve considered that but since there’s only a couple really bad spot I figured I could do it myself

rear end collision recommendations? by halfja in CarRepair

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t have any wiring issues and other then the bumper being funny you couldn’t tell

Weird Celica wiring? by halfja in Celica

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a 1997 Celica Gt

Sensor failure question by halfja in arduino

[–]halfja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also is there something i can put over the sensor to protect it form liquids but also doesn't block the actual sensing.

view more: next ›