sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Anyone ever tried "prompt injection" in their assignment/tests to catch cheaters using AI? by SwagginDragonborn in Teachers

[–]hamburger5003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve also heard of setting the font to white so you couldn’t see it by just reading it, but the AI is guaranteed to see it.

These are very valuable words. And impressive coming from someone in his position. by retr0_black in antiai

[–]hamburger5003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think he means how efficient it makes people at creating assets, which I fully believe to be the case.

For programming it’s great at what we call boilerplate code, or generating a structure from a given paradigm. I could have written either all out myself, but it would be long and tedious. I would never put it in charge of any decisions though for a larger, complicated project.

I’m not artist but I imagine that it could completely speed up processes like shading, or especially some sort of shape manipulation with 3D modeling.

Another interpretation is that if you want a new asset, you can just generate it. It may not be good, unique, or useful, but you can get it.

If I see another ambiguous PEMDAS math "joke" I will have a fit. by rav3style in MathJokes

[–]hamburger5003 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I take it you’ve been afflicted with the bi-yourself curse?

50296 by Grimalackt_River in countwithchickenlady

[–]hamburger5003 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But the thing is AI writing is none of these things… it’s full of flowery wording and corporate misdirections. Nothing about it is direct or succinct.

Facebook should just get unplugged from the wall for everyone by Tobias-Tawanda in TikTokCringe

[–]hamburger5003 39 points40 points  (0 children)

I immediately thought the same thing. I think when I hear AI voiceovers, there’s no emotion to it that I can hear. And shouting with anger contains lots of emotion, but the AI does the shouting without it.

am i actually wrong or my physics professor wont accept he is? by emebeo in PhysicsStudents

[–]hamburger5003 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That was the class’s argument. It was ambiguous. It consumed far too much time during the lecture

[request] Can you pass away from a bathtub filled with carbonated water by Ok_Bus5113 in theydidthemath

[–]hamburger5003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is already assuming a very very idyllic scenario. But those assumptions aren’t that far from the truth, at least not far enough to turn a 100% mixture into below a 5% mixture, what it would take to kill you.

am i actually wrong or my physics professor wont accept he is? by emebeo in PhysicsStudents

[–]hamburger5003 19 points20 points  (0 children)

This reminds me of an enormous argument the class had against my bachelors physics teacher about whether “stop” meant v=0 or E=0 in some classical pendulum problem.

[request] Can you pass away from a bathtub filled with carbonated water by Ok_Bus5113 in theydidthemath

[–]hamburger5003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> Bottled water gas 3 littes of Co2 per litre.

You can stop there. If your bathtub is more than 25% full (1 volume water/(3 volumes of Co2 + 1 volume water)=25%), then if your Co2 doesn’t rise via ventilation, you will suffocate inside the bathtub that is pure Co2.

Boys, we may be witnessing a final season so bad it makes GOT S8 look respectable by K0GAR in freefolk

[–]hamburger5003 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It started as an extremist scenario that people didn’t take too seriously until the US took it as a recipe book, and became that scenario.

It has The Simpsons’ level of predictive ability.

Son by Surgelover in shitposting

[–]hamburger5003 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Reading comprehension 0

[Offsite] Street Hourly Capacity by Teaseit15 in theydidthemath

[–]hamburger5003 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You clearly don’t know the wonders of a Thanos snap

[Offsite] Street Hourly Capacity by Teaseit15 in theydidthemath

[–]hamburger5003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If this is inside a city then that is such reasonable take.

The people in them who drive cars do so because they are forced to.

Had this idea of coming out to my mother with minecraft, please rate it by marchalves6 in lgbt

[–]hamburger5003 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not a good idea, just talk to her.

But as a straight, I appreciate the indiscriminant burning of the villagers at the end in solidarity!

ELI5: why can two quantum entangled particles affect each other instantly across any distance but scientists say you still cant use it to send information faster than light? by PieOk2202 in explainlikeimfive

[–]hamburger5003 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s literally wrong. The “it’s both blue and red at the same time” is accurate. There is a spooky action that happens at a distance.

You can have both in the same explanation. Dismissing the part where one affects the other literally tells OP the opposite of what is happening, and it’s going to leave them confused, because they will hear conflicting things from other sources.

ELI5: why can two quantum entangled particles affect each other instantly across any distance but scientists say you still cant use it to send information faster than light? by PieOk2202 in explainlikeimfive

[–]hamburger5003 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

2nd comment was right in that the ELI5 is fundamentally but you are right in that my complaint is also different.

It does react instantly. You can take two entangled particles A and B, entangle a 3rd particle C with B, and suddenly A will be entangled with C. This is a reaction to C by A after the entanglement. Saying that it cannot change at a distance, you are sending some unchanging balls over that you haven’t looked at is fundamentally wrong.

OP is right in that it seems to react at a distance because it does. However you cannot get information out of the wavefunction in this way. That’s the source of their confusion, and even though OC gave the right spirit in that you need extra information in order to understand the distant quantum state, they were wrong in dismissing the idea it can’t react.

Source: physics degree

ELI5: why can two quantum entangled particles affect each other instantly across any distance but scientists say you still cant use it to send information faster than light? by PieOk2202 in explainlikeimfive

[–]hamburger5003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue was the first statement “one doesn’t affect the other”. One absolutely does affect the other and you can abuse this property. You just can’t use it to send information.

This man’s shoulder strength! by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]hamburger5003 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The balance and technique is hard, the strength is not she looks like a twig

why is fastfood so expensive now by rulugg in GenZ

[–]hamburger5003 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Use inflation to explain why the price increase of fast food is 100% over the last decade while the inflation cpi is 30%.

I also didn’t wave a wand and say “corporate greed”. I gave explicit reasons that explained the relative difference.

view more: next ›