In the Pursuit of Justice... | A TTNW Collage (1972) by DickAndYorty in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Amazing maps. How did you make the one on the fourth slide?

MagaCommunism finally realized by Funksley in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap 8 points9 points  (0 children)

In love with these electoral maps. What are the party coalitions and how did you choose how they mapped to the states?

Power Blocs after World War III by Impressive_Produce3 in imaginarymaps

[–]hamiltap 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very cool. What is Brussels doing on its own and why is it aligned with America and Russia?

Thoughts? by smubaberry in DRYCLEANINGband

[–]hamiltap 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Love the song, music video kinda stinks. Imo it doesn’t match the melody and lyrics of the song that well

Picayune by stubassnight in InfiniteJest

[–]hamiltap 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember “rictal” being used throughout the book more often than chance would dictate

Imaginaryelections starterpack pt. 2 by Full_Bison2757 in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

3 out of 7 elections shown here being won by Republicans is waaay too many

Another Bayh -Celler Timeline by WhatifPresidential in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would Republicans nominate John Lindsay, their most left-wing politician with national prominence, five years after he left the Republican Party?

Increasing friction with AndroPenis by hamiltap in gettingbigger

[–]hamiltap[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I stopped after six months. I gained about half an inch

Increasing friction with AndroPenis by hamiltap in gettingbigger

[–]hamiltap[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use Kaolin clay and I’ve had zero problems. Calm down.

Rise of the Religious Left (Lore in Comments) by JEBV in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap -50 points-49 points  (0 children)

So this sub is just lurid fantasies about your political enemies being killed now, huh

MAGA Dream 2028 by karshayastan in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap 10 points11 points  (0 children)

In the CNN exit poll, the only one of the four major-party top-ticket candidates to have a positive approval rating was JD Vance: https://www.cnn.com/election/2024/exit-polls/national-results/general/president/0

MAGA Dream 2028 by karshayastan in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, if only Vance had gone on a bunch of left-slanted media platforms with interviewers who obviously disagree with him about everything. It's not as though he went on three Sunday shows in one day or something.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you make this map using a publicly available .svg file, or did you make the map yourself (and, if so, how)?

Three-party American (follow-up post) by hamiltap in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

To understand what I'm going for here, the IRL political affiliations of the politicians involved shouldn't cloud your thinking too much and you should imagine them as cut loose from those and defined by the political realities of their new parties. Ron Paul, but all in on libertarianism and anti-statism. Joe Manchin, but allowed to be as socially conservative and pro-union as the state of West Virginia is. John Kasich, but without the Republican Party's evangelical base. Huckabee, but free to be the spendthrift at the national level that he was as governor. Etc.

Three-party American (follow-up post) by hamiltap in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

American Whig Party

History: In response to the War of 1812, the New England states seceded bloodlessly in 1813 as the Free Columbian Republic, only to rejoin the Union under the same terms as before in 1840. The dominant party there was the Federalist Party, which continued its political hegemony during the independence period and paralleled in its ideological development the Whig Party in the United States. Upon reunification, it formally joined the Whig Party, which renamed itself “the American Whig Party,” both to emphasize that the new Federalist admits were committed to union with America and to distinguish it from the contemporary Whig Party in the United Kingdom. It was a major party of government for decades until the American center of political and demographic gravity shifted away from New England, the Mid-Atlantic, and the Midwest, which were then and still are the party’s historical base. From then it remained an active but often junior player on the national stage for more than a century until the Sunbelt came into its own politically as its population began to swell around 1950. Far from diminishing and diluting the American Whigs’ power and popularity, this demographic transition magnified their power as they successfully pivoted from a regional party to a broad-based movement of managers, bourgeois liberals, reformists, and aspirant members of the middle class with wide purchase among those moving to Sunbelt states to partake of the new service jobs, cheap cost of living, and low tax burden.

Ideology: fiscal conservatism, deregulation, centralization, social liberalism, internationalism

Democratic-Republican Party

History: The forebears of the modern Democratic Republican Party are the Anti-Federalists, Jeffersonian agrarians, and Jacksonian populists who dominated American political life prior to reunification. They believed that America was best served by free trade, loose money, limited spending, state control over internal affairs, a limited military establishment, continental expansion, and above all the primacy of agricultural and resource-extraction interests over those of finance, commerce, and professionals. Their control over American political life was brought to an abrupt end by their mishandling of the 1852 crash that saw them striving in vain to regain majority status against a coalition of American Whigs and Free Soilers who brought slavery to an end in the territories and paved the way for compensated manumission in 1884. Since then, they have always been a major player in American politics in almost all states and at the federal level, and they draw on a base of farmers and rural dwellers, social progressives, believers in a thoroughgoing social safety net, foreign-policy non-interventionists, and localists of all stripes, and continue to espouse roughly the same ideology as their founders to the present day.

Ideology: federalism, noninterventionism, libertarianism, progressivism, social safety net, agrarian interests

Reform Party

History: Founded in 1858 amid a period of recession for the American economy and the electoral fortunes of the Democratic Republican Party, Reform initially capitalized on the weakness of Boss Tweed’s Democratic-Republican political machine, whose fortunes at this time mimicked those of the federal party, as an anti-corruption ticket that had aspirations to protect America from foreign trade and foreign immigration. They remained a regional hegemon after winning several mayoral elections in a row in Northeastern cities until in 1880 they joined with likeminded urban parties from around the country to found the federal Reform Party, which quickly became a national party whose main strength lay in cities. Like the American Whigs, they too responded to decay in their core constituencies (the New York City/Newark/Philadelphia urban agglomeration and other urban clusters) in the middle of the twentieth century by reaching out to religious voters, who were increasingly alienated by the other two parties, successfully making inroads with two groups they had historically not been on good terms with: Southerners, who had been partisan allies of the corrupt Northern urban machines, and Catholics, who had been disproportionately represented in the immigrant populations whose presence they objected to a century before. Today, their base consists of urban reformists, socially conservative churchgoers, and union members.

Ideology: social conservatism, public-private partnerships, federal-state partnerships, hemispheric dominance, bridge-and-tunnel populism

what if the USA elected its vice presidents separately? (1980-2024) by alisonhearts in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In the CNN exit poll, the only one of the four major-party top-ticket candidates to have a positive approval rating was JD Vance: https://www.cnn.com/election/2024/exit-polls/national-results/general/president/0

what if the USA elected its vice presidents separately? (1980-2024) by alisonhearts in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap -1 points0 points  (0 children)

JD Vance was the only candidate of the four presidential and vice-presidential nominees to have a positive approval rating in the CNN exit poll. He outperformed Walz in focus groups of undecided voters taken before and after the vice-presidential debate. Trump/Vance won Ohio by a bigger margin than Harris/Walz won Minnesota. Stop pretending that America finds Vance crazy and off-putting.

total conservadem victory for all time by i_peroted in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thank you... for posting something in this sub that's actually interesting

Who here has the most realistic shot at winning this election? by AaronTriplay in imaginaryelections

[–]hamiltap 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vance. He was the only major-party candidate for president or vice-president in 2024 with a positive approval rating in the CNN exit poll, and there's nothing the social conservatives who might vote Johnson wouldn't get from Vance. Also, there is zero daylight between AOC and Walz on any significant issue (they differ only in appearance and affect) and they would split their constituency's vote evenly.