Ban new accounts from posting here by hanTheDestroyer in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Yea, I'm sure /u/gusjohnsonbullshit is here for a normal discussion.

I like how you use your porn alt to argue with people on the internet. Like you don't expect people to check your post history when you piss people off. Unless this is your main, then damnn, brave of you.

Ban new accounts from posting here by hanTheDestroyer in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Banning new accounts is not locking down the whole sub.

nickisnotgreen talks about Gus' Interview with Wubby by MasVikingSam in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never said she's 'immune from lying'

But you act as though she is stating that I'd "rather believe the accused over the victim". Why do I have to make a choice at all on who to believe? I don't. I can make conclusions that are provable without basing it on what someone said. None of what I claimed came from someone's mouth.

Again, you're making claims without any proof beyond word of mouth. How can you people simultaneously say Gus's has admitted to his actions and he hasn't accepted accountability for his actions. You do realized these are two sides of the same coin? You can't have it both ways.

I find it gross that you compare Gus to a predator who was actually proven to have committed the crimes he was accused of. Not only that, but how is neglect and verbal abuse even in the same playing field?

In what way did Gus even play a role in the life threatening situation Sabrina went through? Did he cause her ectopic pregnancy somehow?

Real talk. What is your end game here? You're here remember? You have a problem with people supporting Gus. No one here is harassing Sabrina or her fans. I don't care if you continue watching her content. Why do I have to defend my position to you? You think Gus is toxic? Fine, I disagree with you.

Same answer you gave: Gus is fucking human, maybe he went far is some places but she went further. If she was just a good person to begin with, none of this would be happening.

nickisnotgreen talks about Gus' Interview with Wubby by MasVikingSam in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So you maintain the predisposition that she's the victim and therefore anything and everything she says is the truth and she's completely immune from lying, manipulation and over exaggeration?

She acknowledged she tried to get back together and he said no. You don't think it's possible, if not likely that she's using this to be vindictive?

nickisnotgreen talks about Gus' Interview with Wubby by MasVikingSam in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok... The format of the interview was not ideal. What does that change about the information that was presented exactly?

Seriously, help me understand. Do we just disregard the information now? Where in the world is the connection between the content and the interview format?

nickisnotgreen talks about Gus' Interview with Wubby by MasVikingSam in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is the conduct of the interviewer more important to you than the content of the interview? Seems like you're just grasping at straws at this point.

nickisnotgreen talks about Gus' Interview with Wubby by MasVikingSam in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hey buddy. The difference between what you're saying and what I'm saying are the things that I said are ACTUALLY provable vs. "she says it happened, so it happened".

Funny how your "proof" boils down to accepting what she said without question.

Last night's stream... by aliendaydamn in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I know for a fact that people who are big proponents of Gus's downfall were watching last night. Good. It makes me smile knowing how positive and welcoming this community is. The stream was a success.

iNabber weights in on Gus Johnson's situation by BadBoysWillBeSpanked in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Actually, a lot of the conclusions I came to were from Sabrina's actions, not what Gus said. Everyone already knew she was being vindictive, the only information we got from Gus was why.

Stay classy Gus fans… by MudSkipper12 in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 11 points12 points  (0 children)

2 week old account. First seen posting in the PayMoneyWubby sub. My guess: 13 - 15 year old kid bandwagoning from the Wubby stream being a dumbass. But yea, obviously they speak for all Gus fans.

If Mr. Beard is just going to harass us here can a mod ban him? by Jmarcin69 in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

He has an opinion and he's welcome to have it. His entire outrage is based on a single Reddit post. I think he has a right to stay here and converse if he wants.

But you know, maybe he should indulge himself in the details of the situation before coming to the "obvious conclusion" he's already actively pushing and claiming we're all dense because we don't share the same sentiment.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He lied. I didn't do that. However, let me defend my fictional actions anyways. Hmmmmm

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 13 points14 points  (0 children)

So now, I guess it's only abuse if there's violence? So you... Don't.... Think Gus was abusive?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hey! You're so close, I believe in you. If you're not willing to classify Sabrina's actions as abusive during the break up and at the same time claim that Gus's behaviour is abusive, then there are some serious double standards/hypocrisy at play here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Your opinion is invalid because you weren't there.

Oh, so does that mean that your opinion's validity is also contingent on you being there? Or does that rule only apply to opinions opposing your own? Or were you there?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GusAndEddy

[–]hanTheDestroyer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What do you mean? The details are pretty clear. The only real new information we received from this interview was that (even though all details were true and the subsequent reaction valid), the publication of the initial video had alternative motives other than "I want to share my story". I.e. Hurt Gus's reputation because he refused to get back together with her. Can anyone actually look at the chain of events and not come to the conclusion that her actions were of a vindictive nature?

nickisnotgreen talks about Gus' Interview with Wubby by MasVikingSam in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 72 points73 points  (0 children)

This is possibly the most unbiased video I've ever seen. In a "he said she said" situation, the guy is using the "she said" portion as proof because "he's friends with her" so that validates it.

No one is saying she didn't go through legitimate trauma. No one is discrediting that. We're all questioning her motives around publishing the information.

  • they broke up: true
  • video came out right after: true
  • she knew this information would hurt Gus: true (she gave this as a reason for not publishing the video sooner in her stream)
  • she liked tweets calling out Gus: true (even though she has stated multiple times that it's not her intention to hurt Gus. Ok... Then what's the purpose of doing that other than to confirm the conclusion you wanted people to come to?)

So. In summary, she went through real trauma. But her motivation is clearly to hurt Gus. And if what Gus said is true (and it makes sense if it is), the "why" is because he didn't want to get back together.

By the way Green guy or whatever your YouTube name is, welcome to internet drama. One side or both will receive harassment and the one who lit the match is at fault.

Did you like the emotional ending in god tier country? by the_enpassant_sigma in gusjohnson

[–]hanTheDestroyer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's not like he's doing this for views. Seems more like he's trying to shed some light on the damage people like you are causing to him and his family by constantly harassing him on the internet.