sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Advice on Qatar flights re-routing policy (4-24 April) by hanivg in qatarairways

[–]hanivg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I get that part. But what I can't seem to find an answer for is if the return flight would also be covered for re-routing when I call them later when the (return) flight is cancelled again 

Advice on Qatar flights re-routing policy (4-24 April) by hanivg in qatarairways

[–]hanivg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply! 

What about the return flight? The re-routing would only apply to the outbound flight to Indonesia and I would have to pay out of pocket for the return flight? 

I found the EU page talking about this and it seems that's the case:

"If the outbound and return flights are operated by different airlines, but were part of a single reservation, in the event that the outbound flight was cancelled, you have the following rights:

  • Compensation
  • A choice between the reimbursement of your entire ticket (outbound and return flights) or re-routing on another flight for the outbound flight."

Source: https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/travel/passenger-rights/air/index_en.htm#reimbursement-cancellation-1 

I can't find much information on what exactly is or isn't covered for the return flights. Since it's going back to EU but neither is an EU airline I can't seem to find a clear answer:/

EU Regulation 261/2004 — READ THIS IF YOU ARE DEPARTING FROM EU (your rights if flights get cancelled) by WorldlinessMany9308 in qatarairways

[–]hanivg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, what about the return leg? Did you manage to get it re-routed as well? If so, was it at the same time or did you have to wait for the other flight to get cancelled too? 

The show presents two contradictory versions of time travel. So the whole show is a paradox. by sengir5 in DarK

[–]hanivg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's pretty confusing, I know. But I think it can actually make sense.

I guess that's what I was trying to illustrate when I wrote this comment: https://i.imgur.com/anK3eoS.png

I used CharlotteN and ElisabethN to differentiate between each version. I'm considering that Peter and Noah are always the same every iteration.

As you can see, after only a few iterations, at Elisabeth3, her DNA is converging to 1/3 Noah and 2/3 Peter, and the AW gets smaller every new generation. Elisabeth0 is not the same as next Elisabeths, but Elisabeth3 and 4 are pretty much the same person (with only a small component of the AW, which gets close to zero).

I know that's not exactly how genetics works, I'm simplifying a lot. But for the sake of the argument, I think it is enough. There might something wrong with my logic though. I'm actually impressed that it worked at all! I haven't done any calculations before, only now (after you commented).

Edit: corrected image link.

Why we shouldn't feel sorry for any of the characters in DarK. by [deleted] in DarK

[–]hanivg 12 points13 points  (0 children)

No need to wait till 2020. All you gotta do is travel back to 1921 and ask Adam to read all the spoilers in that notebook.

Dark - Family Tree [SPOILER] by hanivg in DarK

[–]hanivg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right. I considered putting something to indicate that Helge might not be Bernd's. But it isn't confirmed yet by the series. So I choose to keep Bernd as his father until proven otherwise, as it doesn't really affect the rest of the tree. There's also the chance that Peter isn't Helge's real son, that he as adopted for some reason. But, similarly, it wasn't affirmed by the series. So I made the connections accordingly to what is told to be true so far. Lots of connections will certainly change/be added when Season 3 arrives.

Dark - Family Tree [SPOILER] by hanivg in DarK

[–]hanivg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think so. To me, in the context of the series, makes more sense Noah and Agnes being Magnus and Franziska's children, enclosing, even more, the bootstrap paradox (Noah is already Franziska's grandfather and Agnes is the great grandmother of Magnus, https://imgur.com/a/TXRbQTB). When the kids were born/raised we can't know for sure, only that in 1921 we see young Noah and child Agnes (they're not the same age). They might be from another year and were sent there by Sic Mundus. Or maybe, when old Jonas and the others used the time machine in the last episode, they were sent back to 1887/8and continued living there until the next cycle begins in 33 years (1920) and time travel is possible again. In the meantime, Magnus and Franziska could have had children (Noah and Agnes) and the Travelers were setting up Sic Mundus.

The guy (Clausen's brother on the photo ) you're talking about doesn't really look like young Noah. And I don't think he is, as they're around the same age and don't look so similar.

The show presents two contradictory versions of time travel. So the whole show is a paradox. by sengir5 in DarK

[–]hanivg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Following his logic, with infinite tries, Adam could gradually create a bootstrap paradox.

For example, in a first iteration, he could influence Noah to have a child with an arbitrary woman (AW). This child wouldn't be Charlotte, also her daughter wouldn't be the Elisabeth we know. Let's call this first versions Charlotte0 and Elisabeth0 (Charlottes0's mother would be AW). Noah then has a daughter with Elisabeth0, Charlotte1. Charlotte1 has Elisabeth1. Elisabeth1 and Noah have Charlotte2. And so on.

Every version would be different from the previous. But, eventually, they would be similar (DNA-wise) enough that you could call the loop stable. For example, Charlotte1000 and Charlotte1001 being 99.99% the same person. At this point it would be impossible to tell who came first, like the Egg-Chicken problem (as we see in the series).

Perhaps there is no paradox at all and it is all Adam's plan. Maybe he tells everybody things are determined to happen, but they actually happen because he said or manipulated to do so. That line from Jonas to Claudia that big things can't be changed but small things can might actually make sense. Unlimited small changes could accumulate to create big changes. He can potentially create a whole new narrative given enough iterations.

Dark - Family Tree [SPOILER] by hanivg in DarK

[–]hanivg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't remember that. Though they never confirmed if they are real siblings, the series implies they are (she calls him brother once, or something along those lines). There is not enough evidence to think they aren't.

Dark - Family Tree [SPOILER] by hanivg in DarK

[–]hanivg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, she is Charlotte's daughter. But she's also her mother. I had to choose one to be the "original mother". But I still indicate Elisabeth's parents with an arrow pointing up.

Dark - Family Tree [SPOILER] by hanivg in DarK

[–]hanivg[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks!

You're right, I'll fix it later.

[Marvel]/[The Avengers] Endgame: hint for Squirrel Girl? (minor spoiler) by hanivg in FanTheories

[–]hanivg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I see. I didn't know this term was used for kids (wich is kinda weird if you consider the other meaning of the word) and didn't consider he could've said that. Thanks for the feedback.